Recent years have revealed an unprecedented demand for AI-based technology, leading to a common setting where immense data is distributed across multiple locations. This creates a communication bottleneck among the storage facilities, often aiming to jointly solve tasks of small solution size k from input of astronomically large size n. Motivated by federated and distributed machine learning applications, we study two fundamental optimization problems, maximum weight matroid independent set (MW-IS) and maximum weight matching (MWM), in a zero communication computational model. In this model, the data is dispersed between m servers. Without any communication, each server has to send a message to a central coordinator which is required to compute an optimal solution for the original (large) instance.

While there remains a small gap between our main lower bound of Theorem 3 and the deterministic quantised gradient descent of Section 6, we can show that the gap cannot be closed by improved deterministic algorithms where the coordinator learns value of objective function F(x) in addition to the minimiser x. That is, our quantised gradient descent is the communication-optimal deterministic algorithm for variant (1) for objectives with constant condition number. Recall that in the N-player equality over universe of size d, denoted by EQd,N, each player i is given an input bi 2{ 0,1}d, and the task is to decide if all players have the same input. It is known [33] that the deterministic communication complexity of EQd,N is CC(EQd,N)= ( Nd). Theorem 8. Given parameters N, d, ", 0 and = 0N satisfying d /" = (1), any deterministic protocol solving (1) for quadratic input functions x 7! 0kx x0k22 has communication complexity Nd log( d/"), if the coordinator is also required to output estimate r 2 R for the minimum function value such that Assume is a deterministic protocol solving (1) with communication complexity C .We show that can then solve N-party equality over a universe of size D = ( dlog( d/")), implying C = ( ND)= Nd log( d/") . More specifically, let S be the set given by Lemma 2 with =(2 "/)1/2, and let D = dlog|S|e = (dlog( d/")). Note that since we assume d /" = (1), the set S has at least two elements and D 1.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

For a large number of experts and days, it may not be feasible to run classical low-regret algorithms.

Maximum target coverage by adjusting the orientation of distributed sensors is an important problem in directional sensor networks (DSNs).