We study a broad class of graphical models whose independencies correspond to vertex separation in mixed graphs with directed, undirected, and bidirected edges, that are capable of encoding independence structures arising from feedback, latent and selection mechanisms. In particular, we introduce separable graphs, in which each missing edge implies the existence of a separating set for its endpoints, and essentially separable graphs, those graphs separation equivalent to a separable graph. We show that these models include many existing graph families used to define graphical models an provide several characterizations of separable graphs and essentially separable graphs. We also provide multiple characterizations of separation equivalence for separable graphs. One is a graphical characterization in terms of ordinary graph properties, extending earlier results for specific subfamilies Another is a separational characterization depending only on graph separation properties. Finally, we provide a canonical representation for the equivalence classes of essentially separable graphs and develop an algorithm that, under suitable assumptions, identifies the equivalence class of any essentially separable graph.

We study the tradeoff between sample complexity and round complexity in ondemand sampling, where the learning algorithm adaptively samples from k distributions over a limited number of rounds. In the realizable setting of MultiDistribution Learning (MDL), we show that the optimal sample complexity of an r-round algorithm scales approximately as dkΘ(1/r)/ε. For the general agnostic case, we present an algorithm that achieves near-optimal sample complexity of eO((d + k)/ε2) within eO( k) rounds. Of independent interest, we introduce a new framework, Optimization via On-Demand Sampling (OODS), which abstracts the sample-adaptivity tradeoff and captures most existing MDL algorithms. We establish nearly tight bounds on the round complexity in the OODS setting. The upper bounds directly yield the eO( k)-round algorithm for agnostic MDL, while the lower bounds imply that achieving sub-polynomial round complexity would require fundamentally new techniques that bypass the inherent hardness of OODS.

We investigate congested assignment problems where agents have preferences over both resources and their associated congestion levels. These agents are averse towards congestion, i.e., consistently preferring lower congestion for identical resources. Such scenarios are ubiquitous across domains including traffic management and school choice, where fair resource allocation is essential. We focus on the concept of competitiveness, recently introduced by Bogomolnaia and Moulin [6], and contribute a polynomial-time algorithm that determines competitiveness, resolving their open question. Additionally, we explore two optimization variants of congested assignments by examining the problem of finding envy-free or maximally competitive assignments that guarantee a certain amount of social welfare for every agent, termed top-guarantees [6]. While we prove that both problems are NP-hard, we develop parameterized algorithms with respect to the number of agents or resources.

The phenomenon of benign overfitting, where a trained neural network perfectly fits noisy training data but still achieves near-optimal test performance, has been extensively studied in recent years for linear models and fully-connected/convolutional networks. In this work, we study benign overfitting in a single-head softmax attention model, which is the fundamental building block of Transformers. We prove that under appropriate conditions, the model exhibits benign overfitting in a classification setting already after two steps of gradient descent. Moreover, we show conditions where a minimum-norm/maximum-margin interpolator exhibits benign overfitting. We study how the overfitting behavior depends on the signalto-noise ratio (SNR) of the data distribution, namely, the ratio between norms of signal and noise tokens, and prove that a sufficiently large SNR is both necessary and sufficient for benign overfitting.

In decision-making processes, an intelligent agent with causal knowledge can optimize action spaces to avoid unnecessary exploration. A structural causal bandit framework provides guidance on how to prune actions that are unable to maximize reward by leveraging prior knowledge of the underlying causal structure among actions. A key assumption of this framework is that the agent has access to a fully-specified causal diagram representing the target system. In this paper, we extend the structural causal bandits to scenarios where the agent leverages a Markov equivalence class. In such cases, the causal structure is provided to the agent in the form of a partial ancestral graph (PAG). We propose a generalized framework for identifying potentially optimal actions within this graph structure, thereby broadening the applicability of structural causal bandits.

Prompt engineering is crucial for leveraging the full potential of large language models (LLMs). While automatic prompt optimization offers a scalable alternative to costly manual design, generating effective prompts remains challenging. Existing methods often struggle to stably generate improved prompts, leading to low efficiency, and overlook that prompt optimization easily gets trapped in local optima. Addressing this, we propose GRACE, a framework that integrates two synergistic strategies: Gated Refinement and Adaptive Compression, achieving Efficient prompt optimization. The gated refinement strategy introduces a feedback regulation gate and an update rejection gate, which refine update signals to produce stable and effective prompt improvements.

Causal discovery methods are powerful tools for uncovering the structure of relationships among variables, yet they face significant challenges in scalability and interpretability, especially in high-dimensional settings. In many domains, researchers are not only interested in causal links between individual variables, but also in relationships among sets or clusters of variables. Learning causal structure at the cluster level can both reveal higher-order relationships of interest and improve scalability. In this work, we introduce an approach for causal discovery over clusters in Markov causal systems. We propose a new graphical model that encodes knowledge of relationships between user-defined clusters while fully representing independencies and dependencies over clusters, faithful to a given distribution. We then define and characterize a graphical equivalence class of these models that share cluster-level independence information. Lastly, we present a sound and complete algorithm for causal discovery to represent learnable causal relationships between clusters of variables.

The VC-dimension is a well-studied and fundamental complexity measure of a set system (or hypergraph) that is central to many areas of machine learning. We establish several new results on the complexity of computing the VC-dimension. In particular, given a hypergraph H = (V,E), we prove that the naive 2O(|V|)-time algorithm is asymptotically tight under the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). We then prove that the problem admits a 1-additive fixed-parameter approximation algorithm when parameterized by the maximum degree of Hand a fixed-parameter algorithm when parameterized by its dimension, and that these are essentially the only such exploitable structural parameters.

We study fundamental connections between coalition formation games and clustering, illustrating the cross-disciplinary relevance of these concepts. We focus on graphical hedonic games where agents' preferences are compactly represented by a friendship graph and an enmity graph. In the context of clustering, friendship relations naturally align with data point similarities, whereas enmity corresponds to dissimilarities. We consider two stability notions based on single-agent deviations: local popularity and local stability.

We study a two-institution stable matching model in which candidates from two distinct groups are evaluated using partially correlated signals that are groupbiased. This extends prior work (which assumes institutions evaluate candidates in an identical manner) to a more realistic setting in which institutions rely on overlapping, but independently processed, criteria. These evaluations could consist of a variety of informative tools such as standardized tests, shared recommendation systems, or AI-based assessments with local noise. Two key parameters govern evaluations: the bias parameter β (0,1], which models systematic disadvantage faced by one group, and the correlation parameter γ [0,1], which captures the alignment between institutional rankings. We study the representation ratio R(β,γ), i.e., the ratio of disadvantaged to advantaged candidates selected by the matching process in this setting.