Sentiment signals derived from sparse news are commonly used in financial analysis and technology monitoring, yet transforming raw article-level observations into reliable temporal series remains a largely unsolved engineering problem. Rather than treating this as a classification challenge, we propose to frame it as a causal signal reconstruction problem: given probabilistic sentiment outputs from a fixed classifier, recover a stable latent sentiment series that is robust to the structural pathologies of news data such as sparsity, redundancy, and classifier uncertainty. We present a modular three-stage pipeline that (i) aggregates article-level scores onto a regular temporal grid with uncertainty-aware and redundancy-aware weights, (ii) fills coverage gaps through strictly causal projection rules, and (iii) applies causal smoothing to reduce residual noise. Because ground-truth longitudinal sentiment labels are typically unavailable, we introduce a label-free evaluation framework based on signal stability diagnostics, information preservation lag proxies, and counterfactual tests for causality compliance and redundancy robustness. As a secondary external check, we evaluate the consistency of reconstructed signals against stock-price data for a multi-firm dataset of AI-related news titles (November 2024 to February 2026). The key empirical finding is a three-week lead lag pattern between reconstructed sentiment and price that persists across all tested pipeline configurations and aggregation regimes, a structural regularity more informative than any single correlation coefficient. Overall, the results support the view that stable, deployable sentiment indicators require careful reconstruction, not only better classifiers.

We study nonparametric covariance function estimation for functional data observed with noise at discrete locations on a $d$-dimensional domain. Estimating the covariance function from discretely observed data is a challenging nonparametric problem, particularly in multidimensional settings, since the covariance function is defined on a product domain and thus suffers from the curse of dimensionality. This motivates the use of adaptive estimators, such as deep learning estimators. However, existing theoretical results are largely limited to estimators with explicit analytic representations, and the properties of general learning-based estimators remain poorly understood. We establish an oracle inequality for a broad class of learning-based estimators that applies to both sparse and dense observation regimes in a unified manner, and derive convergence rates for deep learning estimators over several classes of covariance functions. The resulting rates suggest that structural adaptation can mitigate the curse of dimensionality, similarly to classical nonparametric regression. We further compare the convergence rates of learning-based estimators with several existing procedures. For a one-dimensional smoothness class, deep learning estimators are suboptimal, whereas local linear smoothing estimators achieve a faster rate. For a structured function class, however, deep learning estimators attain the minimax rate up to polylogarithmic factors, whereas local linear smoothing estimators are suboptimal. These results reveal a distinctive adaptivity-variance trade-off in covariance function estimation.

We derive the asymptotic risk function of regularized empirical risk minimization (ERM) estimators tuned by $n$-fold cross-validation (CV). The out-of-sample prediction loss of such estimators converges in distribution to the squared-error loss (risk function) of shrinkage estimators in the normal means model, tuned by Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE). This risk function provides a more fine-grained picture of predictive performance than uniform bounds on worst-case regret, which are common in learning theory: it quantifies how risk varies with the true parameter. As key intermediate steps, we show that (i) $n$-fold CV converges uniformly to SURE, and (ii) while SURE typically has multiple local minima, its global minimum is generically well separated. Well-separation ensures that uniform convergence of CV to SURE translates into convergence of the tuning parameter chosen by CV to that chosen by SURE.

For simplicity, we omit the schedule coefficients in (5).

Algorithmic machine teaching studies the interaction between a teacher and a learner where the teacher selects labeled examples aiming at teaching a target hypothesis.

In this section, we provide the detailed proof of Theorem 1. We first prove the following lemma, which is a key component used in our proof.

We establish new connections between LwEQ-TD and LfS-TD by studying LwEQ-TD for different learner models based on the richness of their query functions. We show that LwEQ-TD isthesameaswc-TD[18],RTD[22,24],andNCTD[27]forahypothesis class when restricting query functions to specific families.