Large language models (LLMs) integrated with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) have improved factuality by grounding outputs in external evidence. However, they remain susceptible to unfaithful generation, where outputs contradict retrieved context despite its relevance and accuracy. Existing approaches aiming to improve faithfulness primarily focus on enhancing the utilization of external context, but often overlook the persistent influence of internal parametric knowledge during generation. In this work, we investigate the internal mechanisms behind unfaithful generation and identify a subset of mid-to-deep feed-forward networks (FFNs) that are disproportionately activated in such cases. Building on this insight, we propose Parametric Knowledge Muting through FFNSuppression (ParamMute), a framework that improves contextual faithfulness by suppressing the activation of unfaithfulness-associated FFNs and calibrating the model toward retrieved knowledge. To evaluate our approach, we introduce CoFaithfulQA, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate faithfulness in scenarios where internal knowledge conflicts with accurate external evidence. Experimental results show that ParamMute significantly enhances faithfulness across both CoFaithfulQA and the established ConFiQA benchmark, achieving substantial reductions in reliance on parametric memory. These findings underscore the importance of mitigating internal knowledge dominance and provide a new direction for improving LLM trustworthiness in RAG.

Large language models (LLMs) are often prompted with multi-level directives, such as system instructions and user queries, that imply a hierarchy of authority. Yet models frequently fail to enforce this structure, especially in multi-step reasoning where errors propagate across intermediate steps. Existing methods rely on oracle completions but lack verifiable reward signals or intermediate traces, limiting their applicability. We introduce a unified supervision framework that embeds programmatically verifiable checkers into synthesized instruction-conflict instances. Each instance pairs a compliance directive with a conflicting one, along with an executable verifier that deterministically checks output adherence. This enables alignment without oracle labels or reasoning traces, supporting both instruction-tuned and reasoning models. The framework is instantiated via a synthesis pipeline that includes unittest-based validation, LLM-assisted repair, and a probabilistic analysis of cleaning reliability. Fine-tuning on the resulting data improves instruction hierarchy adherence and boosts safety robustness, generalizing to adversarial safety benchmarks without task-specific supervision. This highlights verifiable supervision as a scalable foundation for robust alignment.

Neural networks are known for their ability to approximate smooth functions, yet they fail to generalize perfectly to unseen inputs when trained on discrete operations. Such operations lie at the heart of algorithmic tasks such as arithmetic, which is often used as a test bed for algorithmic execution in neural networks. In this work, we ask: can neural networks learn to execute binary-encoded algorithmic instructions exactly? We use the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) framework to study the training dynamics of two-layer fully connected networks in the infinite-width limit and show how a sufficiently large ensemble of such models can be trained to execute exactly, with high probability, four fundamental tasks: binary permutations, binary addition, binary multiplication, and Subtract and Branch if Negative (SBN) instructions. Since SBN is Turing-complete, our framework extends to computable functions. We show how this can be efficiently achieved using only logarithmically many training data. Our approach relies on two techniques: structuring the training data to isolate bit-level rules, and controlling correlations in the NTK regime to align model predictions with the target algorithmic executions.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable success in various domains but typically rely on centralized, static graphs, which limits their applicability in distributed, evolving environments. To address this limitation, we define the task of Federated Continual Graph Learning (FCGL), a paradigm for incremental learning on dynamic graphs distributed across decentralized clients. Existing methods, however, neither preserve graph topology during task transitions nor mitigate parameter conflicts in server-side aggregation. To overcome these challenges, we introduce MOTION, a generalizable FCGL framework that integrates two complementary modules: the Graph Topology-preserving Multi-Sculpt Coarsening (G-TMSC) module, which maintains the structural integrity of past graphs through a multi-expert, similarity-guided fusion process, and the Graph-Aware Evolving Parameter Adaptive Engine (G-EPAE) module, which refines global model updates by leveraging a topology-sensitive compatibility matrix. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show that our approach improves average accuracy (AA) by an average of 30% over the FedAvg baseline across five datasets while maintaining a negative average forgetting (AF) rate, significantly enhancing generalization and robustness under FCGL settings.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) with Federated Learning (FL) can quickly adapt to privacy-sensitive tasks, but face significant challenges such as high communication costs and increased attack risks, due to their reliance on multiround communication. To address this, One-shot FL (OFL) has emerged, aiming to complete adaptation in a single client-server communication. However, existing adaptive ensemble OFL methods still need more than one round of communication, because correcting heterogeneity-induced local bias relies on aggregated global supervision, meaning they still do not achieve true one-shot communication. In this work, we make the first attempt to achieve true one-shot communication for MLLMs under OFL, by investigating whether implicit (i.e., initial rather than aggregated) global supervision alone can effectively correct local training bias. Our key finding from the empirical study is that imposing directional supervision on local training substantially mitigates client conflicts and local bias. Building on this insight, we propose YOCO, in which directional supervision with sign-regularized LoRAB enforces global consistency, while sparsely regularized LoRAA preserves client-specific adaptability. Experiments demonstrate that YOCO cuts communication to 0.03% of multi-round FL while surpassing those methods in several multimodal scenarios and consistently outperforming all one-shot competitors.

Multi-agent reinforcement learning in mixed-motive settings presents a fundamental challenge: agents must balance individual interests with collective goals, which are neither fully aligned nor strictly opposed. To address this, reward restructuring methods such as gifting and intrinsic motivation have been proposed. However, these approaches primarily focus on promoting cooperation by managing the tradeoff between individual and collective returns, without explicitly addressing fairness with respect to agents' task-specific rewards. In this paper, we propose an adaptive conflict-aware gradient adjustment method that promotes cooperation while ensuring fairness in individual rewards. The proposed method dynamically balances policy gradients derived from individual and collective objectives in situations where the two objectives are in conflict. By explicitly resolving such conflicts, our method improves collective performance while preserving fairness across agents. We provide theoretical results that guarantee monotonic non-decreasing improvement in both the collective and individual objectives and ensure fairness. Empirical results in sequential social dilemma environments demonstrate that our approach outperforms baselines in terms of social welfare, while maintaining fairness.

The boss of Cadbury chocolate-maker Mondelez has defended its decision to continue doing business in Russia but admitted he is not pleased the firm's taxes are funding the war with Ukraine. Chief executive Dirk Van de Put said it was the right decision to stay after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, saying pulling out would risk thousands of jobs and leave Mondelez vulnerable to the Kremlin taking control of its local operations. Many Western companies such as McDonald's exited Russia after it launched a full-scale assault on its neighbour. Others remained but Mondelez said it had discontinued new investment in its Russian business and suspended spending on advertising. In an in-depth discussion as part of the BBC's Big Boss Interview series, Van de Put said: I think over time you try to be neutral in the whole conflict.

More than 1,000 civilians in Sudan have been killed in drone strikes in the first five months of 2026, according to the United Nations. The death toll is due to a "sharp" increase in the use of drone warfare in the country's vicious civil war, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (UNHCHR) Volker Turk said in a speech on Monday. On top of documenting more than 1,000 civilians being killed in the first five months of this year, the UN office also reported "rampant" levels of sexual violence, including rape. The war in the African nation started in April 2023 when a rivalry between Sudan's army chief, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, and the commander of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, Mohamed Hamdan "Hemedti" Dagalo, exploded into war. The conflict, which had first started in the capital Khartoum, soon spread to several areas of the country.

Federated Learning is a promising technique that enables collaborative machine learning while preserving participant privacy.

Online social media provide a platform for people to discuss current events and exchange opinions with their peers. While interactions are predominantly positive, in recent years, there has been a lot of research to understand the conflicts in social networks and how they are based on different views and opinions. In this paper, we ask whether the conflicts in a network reveal a small and interpretable set of prevalent opinion ranges that explain the users' interactions. More precisely, we consider signed graphs, where the edge signs indicate positive and negative interactions of node pairs, and our goal is to infer opinion intervals that are consistent with the edge signs. We introduce an optimization problem that models this question, and we give strong hardness results and a polynomial-time approximation scheme by utilizing connections to interval graphs and the Correlation Clustering problem. We further provide scalable heuristics and show that in experiments they yield more expressive solutions than Correlation Clustering baselines. We also present a case study on a novel real-world dataset from the German parliament, showing that our algorithms can recover the political leaning of German parties based on co-voting behavior.