Pairwise human-preference platforms such as Chatbot Arena have become central to large language model (LLM) evaluation, yet reliable task-specific ranking remains challenging. Global leaderboards mask task heterogeneity, while ranking each fine-grained task independently is unstable under sparse, imbalanced comparisons. We propose a low-rank framework for task-specific LLM ranking from sparse pairwise comparisons, modeling the task-by-model ability matrix $Θ^\star \in \mathbb{R}^{d_t \times d_m}$ as low rank so that information is shared across related tasks while task-specific differences are preserved. We first develop a max-norm ($\ell_\infty$) accurate estimator for the latent scores, combining a convex initializer with alternating-minimization refinement, and prove task-wise top-$K$ recovery guarantees under sparse sampling. Our main contribution is an uncertainty quantification framework for task-specific ranking. We construct cross-fitted one-step debiased estimators for fixed score contrasts -- such as the task-specific ability gap between two models -- yielding asymptotically valid confidence intervals that attain the semiparametric efficiency bound. We then extend the inference to the high-dimensional ranking regime, where per-task ranks and top-$K$ membership are determined by many dependent score-gap hypotheses. Using Gaussian and multiplier-bootstrap calibration, we obtain simultaneous confidence sets for per-task ranks and valid top-$K$ membership tests across many tasks and models. Experiments on synthetic data and Chatbot Arena show that low-rank sharing improves sample efficiency over independent task-wise Bradley-Terry estimation and produces tighter, better-calibrated ranking certificates, with the largest gains in the sparse regime typical of real LLM benchmarks.

Tensor-valued data arise naturally in neuroimaging, genomics, climate science, and spatiotemporal networks, where multilinear dependencies across modes carry information that is destroyed under vectorization. Existing approaches either impose a single low-rank structure, which can miss localized signal, or treat the tensor as a long vector, which discards its multiway geometry. We propose a *Dual-Channel Tensor Neural Network* (DC-TNN) that decomposes each tensor input into a low-rank core and a sparse refinement, and processes the two components through coupled neural channels. The framework is structure-agnostic and accommodates CP, Tucker, and tensor-train cores within a single architecture. For estimation, we establish non-asymptotic risk bounds for the DC-TNN estimator that decompose into network approximation, core estimation, and refinement-selection terms, and show that the effective dimension is determined jointly by the core rank and refinement sparsity rather than by the ambient tensor size. For inference, we develop a *structure-aware conformal ROC* procedure that calibrates within the core-refinement latent space and produces ROC and AUC confidence bands with finite-sample, distribution-free coverage. Building on this, we propose a *conformal structure selector* that, to our knowledge, is the *first distribution-free procedure* for choosing among candidate tensor decompositions with finite-sample validity. Simulations and an analysis of a protein dataset demonstrate competitive predictive accuracy, reliable uncertainty quantification, and consistent recovery of the tensor structure.

We propose a robust and reliable evaluation metric for generative models called Topological Precision and Recall (TopP&R, pronounced "topper"), which systematically estimates supports by retaining only topologically and statistically significant features with a certain level of confidence. Existing metrics, such as Inception Score (IS), Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), and various Precision and Recall(P&R) variants, rely heavily on support estimates derived from sample features. However, the reliability of these estimates has been overlooked, even though the quality of the evaluation hinges entirely on their accuracy. In this paper, we demonstrate that current methods not only fail to accurately assess sample quality when support estimation is unreliable, but also yield inconsistent results. In contrast, TopP&R reliably evaluates the sample quality and ensures statistical consistency in its results. Our theoretical and experimental findings reveal that TopP&R provides a robust evaluation, accurately capturing the true trend of change in samples, even in the presence of outliers and non-independent and identically distributed (Non-IID) perturbations where other methods result in inaccurate support estimations. To our knowledge, TopP&Ris the first evaluation metric specifically focused on the robust estimation of supports, offering statistical consistency under noise conditions.

Formal model evaluation methods typically certify that a model satisfies a prescribed target key performance indicator (KPI) level. However, in many applications, the relevant target KPI level may not be known a priori, and the user may instead wish to compare candidate models by analyzing the full trade-offs between performance and reliability achievable at test time by the models. This task, requiring the reliable estimate of the test-time KPI distributions, is made more complicated by the fact that the same data must often be used both to pre-select a subset of candidate models and to estimate their KPI distributions, causing a potential post-selection bias. In this work, we introduce post-selection distributional model evaluation (PS-DME), a general framework for statistically valid distributional model assessment after arbitrary data-dependent model pre-selection. Building on e-values, PS-DME controls post-selection false coverage rate (FCR) for the distributional KPI estimates and is proved to be more sample efficient than a baseline method based on sample splitting. Experiments on synthetic data, text-to-SQL decoding with large language models, and telecom network performance evaluation demonstrate that PS-DME enables reliable comparison of candidate configurations across a range of reliability levels, supporting the statistically reliable exploration of performance--reliability trade-offs.

In this paper we consider the dynamic assortment selection problem under an uncapacitated multinomial-logit (MNL) model. By carefully analyzing a revenue potential function, we show that a trisection based algorithm achieves an item-independent regret bound of Op? T log log T q, which matches information theoretical lower bounds up to iterated logarithmic terms. Our proof technique draws tools from the unimodal/convex bandit literature as well as adaptive confidence parameters in minimax multi-armed bandit problems.

Causal inference is paramount for understanding the effects of interventions, yet extracting personalized insights from increasingly complex data remains a significant challenge for modern machine learning. This is the case, in particular, when considering functional outcomes observed over a continuous domain (e.g., time, or space). Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects, known as CATE, has emerged as a crucial tool for personalized decision-making, but existing meta-learning frameworks are largely limited to scalar outcomes, failing to provide satisfying results in scientific applications that leverage the rich, continuous information encoded in functional data. Here, we introduce FOCaL (Functional Outcome Causal Learning), a novel, doubly robust meta-learner specifically engineered to estimate a functional heterogeneous treatment effect (F-CATE). FOCaL integrates advanced functional regression techniques for both outcome modeling and functional pseudo-outcome reconstruction, thereby enabling the direct and robust estimation of F-CATE. We provide a rigorous theoretical derivation of FOCaL, demonstrate its performance and robustness compared to existing non-robust functional methods through comprehensive simulation studies, and illustrate its practical utility on diverse real-world functional datasets. FOCaL advances the capabilities of machine intelligence to infer nuanced, individualized causal effects from complex data, paving the way for more precise and trustworthy AI systems in personalized medicine, adaptive policy design, and fundamental scientific discovery.

One way of constructing the confidence set uses the superlevel filtration of the kernel density estimator and the bootstrap confidence band.