This work focuses on the question of learning from a large number of devices with each device holding only a single sample of data. Several real-world applications exist to this one sample per client setup up including learning from fitness trackers, data/app usage aggregators, body-worn sensing devices, and daily event monitors to name a few. When a client has only one sample, the standard federated learning paradigm breaks down as a local update based on that single point is far from being useful, especially in the earlier rounds for estimation of the model coefficients. This utility is further weakened by the privacy-inducing noise applied at every round. This work caters to this problem to enable such clients to collaboratively contribute to effectively learn a global model without leaking the privacy of their data. The proposed approach injects a single, carefully calibrated noisy perturbation to transform the sample at each client, followed by a post-processed representation which is shared with the server. These representations aggregated at the server are processed to obtain an unbiased gradient update that in expectation matches the non-private centralized gradient while preserving data privacy. This approach is different than traditional private federated learning, where the communication payloads involve model coefficients as opposed to privately transformed data samples. This method enables devices with extremely limited data to collaborate and learn accurate, privacy-preserving models without requiring large local datasets or sacrificing individual privacy.

We developed a tool for detecting domain shifts, namely subtle differences in the probability distributions of datasets. We identify these shifts using an algorithm designed to detect localised density anomalies in high-dimensional feature spaces. If an anomaly is present, we then identify the feature subspace in which the anomaly is most pronounced. This allows us to trace the domain shift to a small set of features, making the shift interpretable. Moreover, we provide a protocol for compensating domain shifts by extracting, from two unlabelled datasets, subsets of samples with no detectable residual distributional difference. We validate the framework on controlled 20-dimensional benchmarks with known ground truth, recovering both broad and localized shifts together with their supporting feature subspaces. We then apply it to healthy electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings represented by 782 features. In age- and sex-matched cohort comparisons differing in measurement-device composition, the method detects device-induced shifts, extracts representative subsets enriched in the imbalanced device components, and identifies ECG features associated with the acquisition contrast. These results suggest that density-shift detection and subspace attribution provide a practical framework for uncovering hidden cohort biases before downstream modelling.

Donor-level disease classification from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) requires strict donor-aware cross-validation: naive pipelines that split cells randomly conflate training and test donors, inflating reported performance through pseudoreplication. We present a donor-aware benchmark evaluating three feature representations across two independent IBD cohorts: centered log-ratio (CLR) transformed cell-type composition, GatedStructuralCFN dependency embeddings, and scVI variational autoencoder latent embeddings. The cohorts are the SCP259 ulcerative colitis atlas (UC vs. Healthy, n=30 donors, 51 cell types) and the Kong 2023 Crohn's disease atlas (CD vs. Healthy, n=71 donors, 55-68 cell types across three intestinal regions). Compartment-stratified CLR composition achieves AUROC 0.956 +/- 0.061 on SCP259; GatedStructuralCFN on the same features achieves 0.978 +/- 0.050. In the Kong cohort, CFN achieves its best performance in the colon region (0.960 +/- 0.055 after feature filtering), exceeding linear CLR (0.900 +/- 0.100), while terminal ileum classification is dominated by linear models (CatBoost CLR 0.967 +/- 0.075 vs. CFN 0.811 +/- 0.164). Cross-dataset transfer (CD->UC, four shared cell types) achieves AUC 0.833 with XGBoost CLR; the reverse direction performs at chance. CFN edge stability analysis shows that compartment-wise composition eliminates spurious unit-sum-induced instability present in global composition (Jaccard 0.026 vs. top-20 recurrence 1.0). CFN shows a consistent numerical advantage over linear models in the colon region of CD (AUROC 0.960 vs. 0.900), though no inter-method comparison reached statistical significance at n<=34 donors per region. Compartment-aware feature construction is critical for both classification performance and structural interpretability. Code: https://github.com/Jonathan-321/sfn-scrna-study

However, the activations of well-fitting KANs tend to exhibit pathologically high-curvature oscillations, making them difficult to interpret, and standard regularization penalties do not prevent this. Here we derive a basis-agnostic curvature penalty and show that penalized models can maintain accuracy while achieving substantially smoother activations. Accounting for how function composition shapes curvature, we prove an upper bound on the full model's curvature relative to the curvature penalty, and use this to motivate richer forms of penalties. Scientific machine learning is increasingly bottlenecked by the trade-off between accuracy and interpretability. Results such as ours that improve interpretability without sacrificing accuracy will further strengthen KANs as a practical tool for both prediction and insight.

We follow the guidelines of the datasheets for datasets [1] to explain the composition, collection, recommended use case, and other details of the CityRefer dataset. For what purpose was the dataset created? We created this CityRefer dataset to facilitate research toward city-scale 3D visual grounding. Who created the dataset (e.g., which team, research group) and on behalf of which entity (e.g., company, institution, organization)? Who funded the creation of the dataset? What do the instances that comprise the dataset represent?