The lawsuit, which was filed Thursday, claims that the AI company unlawfully crawls, scrapes, copies, and distributes CNN's content from CNN Digital Platforms and third-party platforms. It also accuses the AI tools of reproducing verbatim copies of its articles, including paywalled stories, in query responses to users. Perplexity's AI tools allegedly have incorrectly attributed hallucinated content to CNN, which the company says in the suit violates its trademark. CNN's lawsuit stands for the proposition that Perplexity, a company valued at tens of billions of dollars, should not be able to steal from entities that create the original content Perplexity exploits, a CNN spokesperson said in a statement to the outlet. The public rely on high quality news journalism reported by human beings to understand their world, which is frequently dangerous and expensive to produce.

The complaint, filed on Thursday, said that Perplexity unlawfully copied thousands of CNN stories, videos and images to power its products and distribute "identical or substantially similar" competing content. CNN is asking for an unspecified amount of monetary damages and a court order blocking Perplexity from violating its intellectual property rights. "CNN's lawsuit stands for the proposition that Perplexity, a company valued at tens of billions of dollars, should not be able to steal from entities that create the original content Perplexity exploits," the Warner Bros-owned news company said in a statement. Anthropic was the first AI company to settle one of these cases last year, agreeing to pay $1.5bn to resolve a class action lawsuit from a group of authors. Perplexity is also facing lawsuits from The New York Times, Reddit and Dow Jones, among others.

This paper introduces a concept of layer aggregation to describe how information from previous layers can be reused to better extract features at the current layer. While DenseNet is a typical example of the layer aggregation mechanism, its redundancy has been commonly criticized in the literature. This motivates us to propose a very light-weighted module, called recurrent layer aggregation (RLA), by making use of the sequential structure of layers in a deep CNN. Our RLA module is compatible with many mainstream deep CNNs, including ResNets, Xception and MobileNetV2, and its effectiveness is verified by our extensive experiments on image classification, object detection and instance segmentation tasks. Specifically, improvements can be uniformly observed on CIFAR, ImageNet and MSCOCO datasets, and the corresponding RLA-Nets can surprisingly boost the performances by 2-3% on the object detection task. This evidences the power of our RLA module in helping main CNNs better learn structural information in images.

We extra define the following notations for the proof. In Assumption 3.2, we assume the Lipschitz continuity and smoothness for all the activation functions. In the proof of lemmas, e.g., Lemma B.1 and B.2, we only use the fact that they are Lipschitz continuous and smooth, as well as bounded by a constant 0 > 0 at point 0, hence we use () to denote all the activation functions like what we do in Assumption 3.2 for simplicity. Additionally, in the following we introduce notations of the derivatives, mainly used in the proof of Lemma B.1 and Lemma B.2. By definition of feedforward neural networks in Section 2, different from the standard neural networks such as FCNs and CNNs in which the connection between neurons are generally only in adjacent layers, the neurons in feedforward neural networks can be arbitrarily connected as long as there is no loop.

Shift invariance is a critical property of CNNs that improves performance on classification. However, we show that invariance to circular shifts can also lead to greater sensitivity to adversarial attacks. We first characterize the margin between classes when a shift-invariant linear classifier is used. We show that the margin can only depend on the DC component of the signals. Then, using results about infinitely wide networks, we show that in some simple cases, fully connected and shift-invariant neural networks produce linear decision boundaries. Using this, we prove that shift invariance in neural networks produces adversarial examples for the simple case of two classes, each consisting of a single image with a black or white dot on a gray background. This is more than a curiosity; we show empirically that with real datasets and realistic architectures, shift invariance reduces adversarial robustness. Finally, we describe initial experiments using synthetic data to probe the source of this connection.

In the Supplementary materials, we include detailed descriptions on convex surrogate losses,convolutional neural networks, non-asymptotic error bounds for commonly used loss functions, and prove Theorems 2.1,2.2, A toy example on the numerical performance of CNN approximation is presented in Appendix D. We next give a brief review of the convex surrogate loss functions and discuss in details on the connection between the excess risk with respect to the ϕ-loss and that of 0-1 loss [28, 4]. Let ϕbe a given convex univariate function ϕ: R [0,). Instead of minimizing the excess risk R over H, we consider minimizing the risk with respect to the loss ϕ(ϕ-risk) R(f):= E{ϕ(Yf(X))} over a certain class of functions F, where ϕ: R [0,) is some generic loss function. For the special case when H = {h: h(x) = sign(f(x)),f F} and ϕ() is a step function, i.e., ϕ(x) = 1 Guohao Shen and Yuling Jiao contributed equally to this work Corresponding authors 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022). As shown in [28] and [4], for a properly chosen ϕ, ˆfn can indeed help reduce the 0-1 excess risk R (ˆhn) R (h0). More precisely, let R0:= inff measurable R(f), then for a proper ϕ, we have ψ(R (ˆhn) R (h0)) R(ˆfn) R(f0), where ψ: [ 1,1] [0,)is a nonnegative continuous function, invertible on [0,1], and achieves its minimum at 0 with ψ(0) = 0. A wide variety of popular classification methods are based on this tactic.

This is the supplementary information pertaining to the main manuscript. In this supplementary material, we provide the comparative performance of Neurochaos Learning with Deep Neural Network, 1DConvolutional Neural Network (1D CNN), and Long Short term Memory (LSTM) for evaluation of cause-effect classification of timeseries data generated from coupled chaotic master-slave system and autoregressive (AR) processes. We also check whether each of these architectures are able to preserve cause-effect relationship between the corresponding features extracted from the original cause and effect time series. To evaluate the efficacy of Neurochaos Learning (NL: ChaosNet) and deep learning algorithms for the classification of cause-effect, we used simulated datasets from (a) coupled autoregressive (AR) processes, and (b) coupled 1D chaotic skew tent-maps in master-slave configuration. The governing equations for the coupled AR processes are the following: M(t)=a1M(t 1)+γr(t), (1) S(t)=a2S(t 1)+ηM(t 1)+γr(t), (2) where M(t) and S(t) are the independent and the dependent (or the cause and effect) time series respectively; a1 = 0.8, a2 = 0.9, the noise intensity γ = 0.03 and r(t) is independent and identically distributed additive Gaussian noise drawn from a standard normal distribution.