The paradigm of using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) as evaluative judges has emerged as an effective approach in RLHF and inference-time scaling. In this work, we propose Multimodal Reasoner as a Judge (MR. Judge), a paradigm for empowering general-purpose MLLMs judges with strong reasoning capabilities. Instead of directly assigning scores for each response, we formulate the judgement process as a reasoning-inspired multiple-choice problem. Specifically, the judge model first conducts deliberate reasoning covering different aspects of the responses and eventually selects the best response from them. This reasoning process not only improves the interpretibility of the judgement, but also greatly enhances the performance of MLLM judges. To cope with the lack of questions with scored responses, we propose the following strategy to achieve automatic annotation: 1) Reverse Response Candidates Synthesis: starting from a supervised fine-tuning (SFT) dataset, we treat the original response as the best candidate and prompt the MLLM to generate plausible but flawed negative candidates. 2) Text-based reasoning extraction: we carefully design a data synthesis pipeline for distilling the reasoning capability from a text-based reasoning model, which is adopted to enable the MLLM judges to regain complex reasoning ability via warm up supervised fine-tuning. Experiments demonstrate that our MR. Judge is effective across a wide range of tasks. Specifically, our MR. Judge-7B surpasses GPT-4o by 9.9% on VL-RewardBench, and improves performance on MM-Vet during inference-time scaling by up to 7.7%.

Abstract-- This work explores the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to address problems at the intersection of spatial planning and natural language interfaces for navigation. We focus on following complex instructions that are more akin to natural conversation than traditional explicit procedural directives typically seen in robotics. Unlike most prior work where navigation directives are provided as simple imperative commands (e.g., "go to the fridge"), we examine implicit directives obtained through conversational interactions.We leverage the 3D simulator AI2Thor to create household query scenarios at scale, and augment it by adding complex language queries for 40 object types. We demonstrate that a robot using our method CARTIER (Cartographic lAnguage Reasoning Targeted at Instruction Execution for Robots) can parse descriptive language queries up to 42% more reliably than existing LLM-enabled methods by exploiting the ability of LLMs to interpret the user interaction in the context of the objects in the scenario. This paper explores the extent to which natural interaction is possible between human and robot in the context of a navigation task. We seek to answer the question: "Can a robot infer its task in a navigational context without Figure 1: CARTIER prompts an LLM with knowledge about receiving an explicit command?" Household robotic tasks are a robot's environment in order to parse user intent from often formulated using imperative commands with a template implicit, conversational queries. It then informs the robot structure that can be abstracted as "go-do" commands (go where to navigate in order to help the user.