We propose a dataset to study the influence of object-specific characteristics on human pick-and-place movements and compare the quality of the motion kinematics extracted by various sensors. This dataset is also suitable for promoting a broader discussion on general learning problems in the hand-object interaction domain, such as intention recognition or motion generation with applications in the Robotics field. The dataset consists of the recordings of 15 subjects performing 80 repetitions of a pick-and-place action under various experimental conditions, for a total of 1200 pick-and-places. The data has been collected thanks to a multimodal setup composed of multiple cameras, observing the actions from different perspectives, a motion capture system, and a wrist-worn inertial measurement unit. All the objects manipulated in the experiments are identical in shape, size, and appearance but differ in weight and liquid filling, which influences the carefulness required for their handling.

Implicit communication plays such a crucial role during social exchanges that it must be considered for a good experience in human-robot interaction. This work addresses implicit communication associated with the detection of physical properties, transport, and manipulation of objects. We propose an ecological approach to infer object characteristics from subtle modulations of the natural kinematics occurring during human object manipulation. Similarly, we take inspiration from human strategies to shape robot movements to be communicative of the object properties while pursuing the action goals. In a realistic HRI scenario, participants handed over cups - filled with water or empty - to a robotic manipulator that sorted them. We implemented an online classifier to differentiate careful/not careful human movements, associated with the cups' content. We compared our proposed "expressive" controller, which modulates the movements according to the cup filling, against a neutral motion controller. Results show that human kinematics is adjusted during the task, as a function of the cup content, even in reach-to-grasp motion. Moreover, the carefulness during the handover of full cups can be reliably inferred online, well before action completion. Finally, although questionnaires did not reveal explicit preferences from participants, the expressive robot condition improved task efficiency.

RL is increasingly being used to control robotic systems that interact closely with humans. This interaction raises the problem of safe RL: how to ensure that a RL-controlled robotic system never, for instance, injures a human. This problem is especially challenging in rich, realistic settings where it is not even possible to clearly write down a reward function which incorporates these outcomes. In these circumstances, perhaps the only viable approach is based on IRL, which infers rewards from human demonstrations. However, IRL is massively underdetermined as many different rewards can lead to the same optimal policies; we show that this makes it difficult to distinguish catastrophic outcomes (such as injuring a human) from merely undesirable outcomes. Our key insight is that humans do display different behaviour when catastrophic outcomes are possible: they become much more careful. We incorporate carefulness signals into IRL, and find that they do indeed allow IRL to disambiguate undesirable from catastrophic outcomes, which is critical to ensuring safety in future real-world human-robot interactions.

Humans have an extraordinary ability to communicate and read the properties of objects by simply watching them being carried by someone else. This level of communicative skills and interpretation, available to humans, is essential for collaborative robots if they are to interact naturally and effectively. For example, suppose a robot is handing over a fragile object. In that case, the human who receives it should be informed of its fragility in advance, through an immediate and implicit message, i.e., by the direct modulation of the robot's action. This work investigates the perception of object manipulations performed with a communicative intent by two robots with different embodiments (an iCub humanoid robot and a Baxter robot). We designed the robots' movements to communicate carefulness or not during the transportation of objects. We found that not only this feature is correctly perceived by human observers, but it can elicit as well a form of motor adaptation in subsequent human object manipulations. In addition, we get an insight into which motion features may induce to manipulate an object more or less carefully.

As humans, we have a remarkable capacity for reading the characteristics of objects only by observing how another person carries them. Indeed, how we perform our actions naturally embeds information on the item features. Collaborative robots can achieve the same ability by modulating the strategy used to transport objects with their end-effector. A contribution in this sense would promote spontaneous interactions by making an implicit yet effective communication channel available. This work investigates if humans correctly perceive the implicit information shared by a robotic manipulator through its movements during a dyadic collaboration task. Exploiting a generative approach, we designed robot actions to convey virtual properties of the transported objects, particularly to inform the partner if any caution is required to handle the carried item. We found that carefulness is correctly interpreted when observed through the robot movements. In the experiment, we used identical empty plastic cups; nevertheless, participants approached them differently depending on the attitude shown by the robot: humans change how they reach for the object, being more careful whenever the robot does the same. This emerging form of motor contagion is entirely spontaneous and happens even if the task does not require it.

When manipulating objects, humans finely adapt their motions to the characteristics of what they are handling. Thus, an attentive observer can foresee hidden properties of the manipulated object, such as its weight, temperature, and even whether it requires special care in manipulation. This study is a step towards endowing a humanoid robot with this last capability. Specifically, we study how a robot can infer online, from vision alone, whether or not the human partner is careful when moving an object. We demonstrated that a humanoid robot could perform this inference with high accuracy (up to 81.3%) even with a low-resolution camera. Only for short movements without obstacles, carefulness recognition was insufficient. The prompt recognition of movement carefulness from observing the partner's action will allow robots to adapt their actions on the object to show the same degree of care as their human partners.