Diet plays a critical role in human health, yet tailoring dietary reasoning to individual health conditions remains a major challenge. Nutrition Question Answering (QA) has emerged as a popular method for addressing this problem. However, current research faces two critical limitations. On one hand, the absence of datasets involving user-specific medical information severely limits \textit{personalization}. This challenge is further compounded by the wide variability in individual health needs. On the other hand, while large language models (LLMs), a popular solution for this task, demonstrate strong reasoning abilities, they struggle with the domain-specific complexities of personalized healthy dietary reasoning, and existing benchmarks fail to capture these challenges. To address these gaps, we introduce the Nutritional Graph Question Answering (NGQA) benchmark, the first graph question answering dataset designed for personalized nutritional health reasoning. NGQA leverages data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) to evaluate whether a food is healthy for a specific user, supported by explanations of the key contributing nutrients. The benchmark incorporates three question complexity settings and evaluates reasoning across three downstream tasks. Extensive experiments with LLM backbones and baseline models demonstrate that the NGQA benchmark effectively challenges existing models. In sum, NGQA addresses a critical real-world problem while advancing GraphQA research with a novel domain-specific benchmark.

Hyperparameter tuning of deep learning models can lead to order-of-magnitude performance gains for the same amount of compute. Despite this, systematic tuning is uncommon, particularly for large models, which are expensive to evaluate and tend to have many hyperparameters, necessitating difficult judgment calls about tradeoffs, budgets, and search bounds. To address these issues and propose a practical method for robustly tuning large models, we present Cost-Aware Pareto Region Bayesian Search (CARBS), a Bayesian optimization algorithm that performs local search around the performance-cost Pareto frontier. CARBS does well even in unbounded search spaces with many hyperparameters, learns scaling relationships so that it can tune models even as they are scaled up, and automates much of the "black magic" of tuning. Among our results, we effectively solve the entire ProcGen benchmark just by tuning a simple baseline (PPO, as provided in the original ProcGen paper). We also reproduce the model size vs. training tokens scaling result from the Chinchilla project (Hoffmann et al. 2022), while simultaneously discovering scaling laws for every other hyperparameter, via an easy automated process that uses significantly less compute and is applicable to any deep learning problem (not just language models).

Significant advancements in type 1 diabetes treatment have been made in the development of state-of-the-art Artificial Pancreas Systems (APS). However, lapses currently exist in the timely treatment of unsafe blood glucose (BG) levels, especially in the case of rebound hyperglycemia. We propose a machine learning (ML) method for predictive BG scenario categorization that outputs messages alerting the patient to upcoming BG trends to allow for earlier, educated treatment. In addition to standard notifications of predicted hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, we introduce BG scenario-specific alert messages and the preliminary steps toward precise basal suggestions for the prevention of rebound hyperglycemia. Experimental evaluation on the DCLP3 clinical dataset achieves >98% accuracy and >79% precision for predicting rebound high events for patient alerts.

A robotic feeding system must be able to acquire a variety of foods. Prior bite acquisition works consider single-arm spoon scooping or fork skewering, which do not generalize to foods with complex geometries and deformabilities. For example, when acquiring a group of peas, skewering could smoosh the peas while scooping without a barrier could result in chasing the peas on the plate. In order to acquire foods with such diverse properties, we propose stabilizing food items during scooping using a second arm, for example, by pushing peas against the spoon with a flat surface to prevent dispersion. The added stabilizing arm can lead to new challenges. Critically, this arm should stabilize the food scene without interfering with the acquisition motion, which is especially difficult for easily breakable high-risk food items like tofu. These high-risk foods can break between the pusher and spoon during scooping, which can lead to food waste falling out of the spoon. We propose a general bimanual scooping primitive and an adaptive stabilization strategy that enables successful acquisition of a diverse set of food geometries and physical properties. Our approach, CARBS: Coordinated Acquisition with Reactive Bimanual Scooping, learns to stabilize without impeding task progress by identifying high-risk foods and robustly scooping them using closed-loop visual feedback. We find that CARBS is able to generalize across food shape, size, and deformability and is additionally able to manipulate multiple food items simultaneously. CARBS achieves 87.0% success on scooping rigid foods, which is 25.8% more successful than a single-arm baseline, and reduces food breakage by 16.2% compared to an analytical baseline. Videos can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/bimanualscoop-corl22/home .

Intrinsic evaluations of OIE systems are carried out either manually -- with human evaluators judging the correctness of extractions -- or automatically, on standardized benchmarks. The latter, while much more cost-effective, is less reliable, primarily because of the incompleteness of the existing OIE benchmarks: the ground truth extractions do not include all acceptable variants of the same fact, leading to unreliable assessment of models' performance. Moreover, the existing OIE benchmarks are available for English only. In this work, we introduce BenchIE: a benchmark and evaluation framework for comprehensive evaluation of OIE systems for English, Chinese and German. In contrast to existing OIE benchmarks, BenchIE takes into account informational equivalence of extractions: our gold standard consists of fact synsets, clusters in which we exhaustively list all surface forms of the same fact. We benchmark several state-of-the-art OIE systems using BenchIE and demonstrate that these systems are significantly less effective than indicated by existing OIE benchmarks. We make BenchIE (data and evaluation code) publicly available.

We develop a new model of insulin-glucose dynamics for forecasting blood glucose in type 1 diabetics. We augment an existing biomedical model by introducing time-varying dynamics driven by a machine learning sequence model. Our model maintains a physiologically plausible inductive bias and clinically interpretable parameters -- e.g., insulin sensitivity -- while inheriting the flexibility of modern pattern recognition algorithms. Critical to modeling success are the flexible, but structured representations of subject variability with a sequence model. In contrast, less constrained models like the LSTM fail to provide reliable or physiologically plausible forecasts. We conduct an extensive empirical study. We show that allowing biomedical model dynamics to vary in time improves forecasting at long time horizons, up to six hours, and produces forecasts consistent with the physiological effects of insulin and carbohydrates.

ROI for AI in Retail may involve more than the standard calculationBigstockphoto.com AI makes prediction cheaper, and that means it can be used in more and more novel and unexpected ways to drive action in the world. To borrow a concept from Prediction Machines, prediction has become so cheap that we can use cameras, video analytics, and Machine Learning to predict human behavior well enough to enable self-driving cars – a concept that was technically unheard of a few short years ago. Self-driving cars, on the surface, has a business case. When you look at analyses of the benefits of self-driving cars, you find lots of numbers thrown around at an aggregate level – in the US, $317B saved from avoiding lethal crashes (even though so far, self-driving cars have not managed to avoid causing fatalities), $226B saved from avoiding non-lethal crashes, and $99B in time savings.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence have become hot topics in enterprise, entrepreneurial and technology circles. So much so that in his founder's letter yesterday, Alphabet CEO Larry Page touched on the importance of the technology, noting that they began working on it "long before others." Late last year, Google also released Google Cloud Machine Learning, which provides modern machine learning services, with pre-trained models and a service so that developers everywhere can generate their own tailored models. There is no doubt that these developers have endless applications in endless industries for machine learning. As we mentioned in this blog, ML solutions can drastically improve the way we work.

When Facebook, Amazon, IBM, Microsoft and Google team up and form a partnership for the development of a rapidly advancing technology, it's time to start paying attention. You've heard of it, surely. You may know it as Apple's Siri or IBM's Watson. You may know it as Tesla's autopilot. Maybe your mind goes straight to Westworld or Ex Machina.

The chart was generated from the data file weight.2015.csv It requires R and ggplot2. In the following I'll describe the thought process, some other people ideas, and the software I used to lead me in the right direction. The below is what worked for me. Your situation may be different.