This week, I covered the story of Casey Harrell --a man with ALS who is "the first power user" of a brain implant, according to the researchers who worked with him. Harrell is paralyzed and unable to speak coherently without the device. He has now spent almost three years using a brain-computer interface (BCI) that enables him to "speak," surf the web, and perform his job as a climate activist, largely independently. Since Harrell was implanted with the device, in July 2023, a team at the University of California, Davis, has worked with him to adjust and improve its offerings. They've refined its accuracy, for example.

Spatial location and molecular interactions have long been linked to the connectivity patterns of neural circuits. Yet, at the macroscale of human brain networks, the interplay between spatial position, gene expression, and connectivity remains incompletely understood. Recent efforts to map the human transcriptome and connectome have yielded spatially resolved brain atlases, however modeling the relationship between high-dimensional transcriptomic data and connectivity while accounting for inherent spatial confounds presents a significant challenge. In this paper, we present the first deep learning approaches for predicting whole-brain functional connectivity from gene expression and regional spatial coordinates, including our proposed Spatiomolecular Transformer (SMT). SMT explicitly models biological context by tokenizing genes based on their transcription start site (TSS) order to capture multi-scale genomic organization, and incorporating regional 3D spatial location via a dedicated context [CLS] token within its multi-head self-attention mechanism. We rigorously benchmark context-aware neural networks, including SMT and a single-gene resolution Multilayer-Perceptron (MLP), to established rules-based and bilinear methods. Crucially, to ensure that learned relationships in any model are not mere artifacts of spatial proximity, we introduce novel spatiomolecular null maps preserving key transcriptomic autocorrelation structure. Context-aware neural networks outperform linear methods, significantly exceed our stringent null map estimates, and generalize across diverse connectomic datasets and parcellation resolutions. Together, these findings demonstrate a strong, predictable link between the spatial distributions of gene expression and functional brain network architecture, and establish a rigorously validated deep learning framework for decoding this relationship.

Decoding of visual stimuli from noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) has advanced rapidly in the last years; yet, most high-performing brain decoding models rely on complicated, non-interpretable latent spaces. In this study we present an interpretable brain decoding framework that inserts a semantic bottleneck into BrainDiffuser, a well established, simple and linear decoding pipeline. We firstly produce a 214 dimensional binary interpretable space L for images, in which each dimension answers to a specific question about the image (e.g., "Is there a person?",

The brain is made up of a vast set of heterogeneous regions that dynamically organize into pathways as a function of task demands. Examples of such pathways can be found in the interactions between cortical and subcortical networks during learning, or in sub-networks specializing for task characteristics such as difficulty or modality. Despite the large role these pathways play in cognition, the mechanisms through which brain regions organize into pathways remain unclear. In this work, we use an extension of the Heterogeneous Mixture-of-Experts architecture to show that heterogeneous regions do not form processing pathways by themselves, implying that the brain likely implements specific constraints which result in the reliable formation of pathways. We identify three biologically relevant inductive biases that encourage pathway formation: a routing cost imposed on the use of more complex regions, a scaling factor that reduces this cost when task performance is low, and randomized expert dropout. When comparing our resulting Mixtureof-Pathways model with the brain, we observe that the artificial pathways in our model match how the brain uses cortical and subcortical systems to learn and solve tasks of varying difficulty. In summary, we introduce a novel framework for investigating how the brain forms task-specific pathways through inductive biases, and the effects these biases have on the behavior of Mixture-of-Experts models.

Understanding how the human brain progresses from processing simple linguistic inputs to performing high-level reasoning is a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. While modern large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to model neural responses to language, their internal representations are highly "entangled," mixing information about lexicon, syntax, meaning, and reasoning. This entanglement biases conventional brain encoding analyses toward linguistically shallow features (e.g., lexicon and syntax), making it difficult to isolate the neural substrates of cognitively deeper processes. Here, we introduce a residual disentanglement method that computationally isolates these components. By first probing an LM to identify feature-specific layers, our method iteratively regresses out lower-level representations to produce four nearly orthogonal embeddings for lexicon, syntax, meaning, and, critically, reasoning. We used these disentangled embeddings to model intracranial (ECoG) brain recordings from neurosurgical patients listening to natural speech. We show that: 1) This isolated reasoning embedding exhibits unique predictive power, accounting for variance in neural activity not explained by other linguistic features and even extending to the recruitment of visual regions beyond classical language areas.

Driving into the sunset can actually form new neural pathways. More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. Seeing a landscape or place that takes your breath away is actually good for your brain. Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent six days a week. By signing up, you confirm you are 16+, will receive newsletters and promotional content and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy .

Recent studies suggest that the representations learned by large language models (LLMs) are partially aligned to those of the human brain. However, whether and why this alignment score arises from a similar sequence of computations remains elusive. In this study, we explore this question by examining temporally-resolved brain signals of participants listening to 10 hours of an audiobook. We study these neural dynamics jointly with a benchmark encompassing 17 LLMs varying in size and architecture type. Our analyses confirm that LLMs and the brain generate representations in a similar order: specifically, activations in the initial layers of LLMs tend to best align with early brain responses, while the deeper layers of LLMs tend to best align with later brain responses. This brain-LLM alignment is consistent across transformers and recurrent architectures. However, its emergence depends on both model size and context length.

Biological and artificial vision systems both rely on hierarchical architectures, yet it remains unclear how their representational geometry evolves across processing stages, and what functional consequences may arise from potential differences. In this work, we systematically quantify and compare the linear and nonlinear dimensionality of human brain activity (fMRI) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) during natural image viewing. In the human ventral visual stream, both dimensionality measures increase along the visual hierarchy, supporting the emergence of semantic and abstract representations. For linear dimensionality, most ANNs show a similar increase, but only for pooled features, emphasizing the importance of appropriate feature readouts in brain-model comparisons. In contrast, nonlinear dimensionality shows a collapse in the later layers of ANNs, pointing at a mismatch in representational geometry between the human and artificial visual systems. This mismatch may have functional consequences: while high-dimensional brain representations support flexible generalization to abstract features, ANNs appear to lose this capacity in later layers, where their representations become overly compressed. Overall, our findings propose dimensionality alignment as a benchmark for building more flexible and biologically grounded vision models.

Dynamic functional brain networks (DFBNs) are powerful tools in neuroscience research. Recent studies reveal that DFBNs contain heterogeneous neural nodes with more extensive connections and more drastic temporal changes, which play pivotal roles in coordinating the reorganization of the brain. Moreover, the spatio-temporal patterns of these nodes are modulated by the brain's historical states. However, existing methods not only ignore the spatio-temporal heterogeneity of neural nodes, but also fail to effectively encode the temporal propagation mechanism of heterogeneous activities. These limitations hinder the deep exploration of spatio-temporal relationships within DFBNs, preventing the capture of abnormal neural heterogeneity caused by brain diseases.

Decoding of visual stimuli from noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) has advanced rapidly in the last years; yet, most high-performing brain decoding models rely on complicated, non-interpretable latent spaces. In this study we present an interpretable brain decoding framework that inserts a semantic bottleneck into BrainDiffuser, a well established, simple and linear decoding pipeline. We firstly produce a $214-\text{dimensional}$ binary interpretable space $\mathcal{L}$ for images, in which each dimension answers to a specific question about the image (e.g., Is there a person?, Is it outdoors?).