We study the fundamental problem of estimating an unknown discrete distribution p over d symbols, given n i.i.d.

Flow matching is an emerging generative modeling framework that learns continuous-time dynamics to map noise into data. To enhance expressiveness and sampling efficiency, recent works have explored incorporating high-order trajectory information. Despite the empirical success, a holistic theoretical foundation is still lacking. We present a unified framework for standard and high-order flow matching that incorporates trajectory derivatives up to an arbitrary order K. Our key innovation is establishing the marginalization technique that converts the intractable K-order loss into a simple conditional regression with exact gradients and identifying the consistency constraint. We establish sharp statistical rates of the K-order flow matching implemented with transformer networks. With nsamples, flow matching estimates nonparametric distributions at a rate eO(n Θ(1/d)), matching minimax lower bounds up to logarithmic factors.

A significant gap exists between theory and practice in deep learning. Generalization and approximation error bounds are often derived for simplified models or are too loose to be informative. Many rely on the manifold hypothesis and on geometric regularity such as intrinsic dimension, curvature, and reach. Progress requires insight into data-manifold geometry and suitable benchmarks, yet existing options are polarized: analytic manifolds with known geometry but limited applicability, or real-world datasets where geometry is only coarsely estimable. We introduce a benchmarking framework for studying data geometry. We repurpose and extend dSprites and COIL-20 with additional transformation dimensions and dense, axis-aligned sampling, and pair them with finite-difference estimators that recover curvature, reach, and volume at near-ground-truth accuracy in a regime where general-purpose estimators are unreliable or difficult to deploy. The framework is intended as a controlled testbed, useful as a calibration environment for geometric estimators and a sandbox for probing theoretical assumptions. To illustrate its use, we present two application studies, namely assessing the scaling behavior of the bounds of Genovese et al. and Fefferman et al., and tracking the layer-wise geometry of a $β$-VAE, highlighting the behavior of current bounds and the value of controlled benchmarks for guiding and validating future theory. A reference implementation is available at https://github.com/koulakis/manifold-microscope.

This paper addresses the Bayesian optimization problem (also referred to as the Bayesian setting of the Gaussian process bandit), where the learner seeks to minimize the regret under a function drawn from a known Gaussian process (GP). Under a Mat\'ern kernel with some extent of smoothness, we show that the Gaussian process upper confidence bound (GP-UCB) algorithm achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ cumulative regret with high probability. Furthermore, our analysis yields $O(\sqrt{T \ln^2 T})$ regret under a squared exponential kernel. These results fill the gap between the existing regret upper bound of GP-UCB and the current best upper bound provided by Scarlett [2018]. The key idea in our proof is to capture the concentration behavior of the input sequence realized by GP-UCB, enabling us to handle GP's information gain in a refined manner.

We study the minimax estimation error for distributed covariance matrix estimation in the vertical-split (feature-split) setting, where two agents each observe different coordinates of $m$ i.i.d. sub-Gaussian samples and communicate a limited number of bits to a central server. While Rahmani et al. [2025] established nearly tight bounds for dense (unstructured) cross-covariance matrices, we investigate whether imposing elementwise $s$-sparsity on the cross-covariance $C_{21}$ can reduce the required communication and sample complexity. In contrast to the horizontal-split setting, where Braverman et al. [2016] showed that sparsity does not reduce communication cost for mean estimation, we prove that sparsity does help for cross-covariance estimation in the vertical split. Specifically, we establish minimax lower bounds showing that the communication budget per agent scales as $B_k = Ω(σ^4 d_k\, s' \log(d_1 d_2/s')/\varepsilon^2)$ and the sample complexity for cross-covariance estimation as $m = Ω(σ^4\, s' \log(d_1 d_2/s')/\varepsilon^2)$, where $s' = s \wedge d_{\min}$. For the $1$-sparse case, this yields an exponential improvement from $d_1 d_2$ to $\log(d_1 d_2)$ compared to the dense rate. Our lower bounds are established via Fano's method with an explicit sparse packing using a Varshamov--Gilbert-type argument for signed partial permutation matrices combined with the Conditional Strong Data Processing Inequality of Rahmani et al. [2025]. We show the bounds are tight with a matching achievable scheme, based on covering-net quantization and entry-wise hard thresholding, that attains the $s$-sparse lower bound up to polylogarithmic factors.

We study the multi-task linear regression problem in the presence of contaminated tasks. We address the setting where the unknown parameters of a majority of tasks are close in the $\ell_2$-norm, while a fraction of tasks are arbitrary outliers. Existing theoretical frameworks for this problem rely heavily on the assumption that the empirical second moment of each task has a minimum eigenvalue bounded away from zero (order $Ω(1)$). Crucially, this assumption fails in many high-dimensional scenarios, rendering prior guarantees vacuous. To overcome this limitation, we propose an estimator based on matrix-weighted norm regularization. We also introduce a relative balancedness condition, quantified by a balancedness constant, that compares each task's second moment with the average inlier geometry and relaxes the need for taskwise second-moment lower bounds. In favorable regimes with moderate balancedness, our prediction MSE bounds match the rate of Duan and Wang (2023) under substantially weaker spectral assumptions; the resulting task-overall MSE is minimax optimal up to logarithmic factors. Furthermore, we demonstrate that our estimator enjoys a safety guarantee: when the relevant balancedness constant is large or infinite, or when tasks are unrelated, the method performs no worse than independent task learning. Consequently, our methodology achieves simultaneous adaptivity to task similarity, robustness to outliers, and safety outside favorable transfer regimes.

We consider the problem of Imitation Learning (IL) by actively querying noisy expert for feedback. While imitation learning has been empirically successful, much of prior work assumes access to noiseless expert feedback which is not practical in many applications. In fact, when one only has access to noisy expert feedback, algorithms that rely on purely offline data (non-interactive IL) can be shown to need a prohibitively large number of samples to be successful. In contrast, in this work, we provide an interactive algorithm for IL that uses selective sampling to actively query the noisy expert for feedback. Our contributions are twofold: First, we provide a new selective sampling algorithm that works with general function classes and multiple actions, and obtains the best-known bounds for the regret and the number of queries.

In this section, we provide a brief introduction to the concepts from Group Theory which we need in our derivations. A group is a pair (G,)containing a set Gand a binary operation: G G! G,(h,g) 7! h g which satisfies the group axioms: Associativity: 8a,b,c 2 Ga (b c)=( a b) c Identity: 9e 2 G: 8g 2 Gg e = e g = g Inverse: 8g 2 G 9g 1 2 G: g g 1 = g 1 g = e The operation is the group law of G. The inverse elements g 1 of an element g, and the identity element e are unique. In addition, if the group law is also commutative, the group G is an abelian group. To simplify the notation, we commonly write ab instead of a b. It is also common to denote the group (G,) just with the name of its underlying set G. The order of a group G is the cardinality of its set and is indicated by |G|. A group G is finite when |G|2 N, i.e., when it has a finite number of elements. A compact group is a group that is also a compact topological space with continuous group operation. Given a group G, its action on a set X is a map . A simple example of group action is the group law itself: G G! Gwhich defines an action of G on its own elements (X = G). Another important action is the one defined on signals overs the group G. Given a signal x: G! R, the action of an element g 2 G maps x 7! g.x, [g.x](h):= x(g 1h).