Goto

Collaborating Authors

 architecture


Architecting memory and storage in the AI era

MIT Technology Review

With AI inference now driving enterprise workloads, organizations must rethink infrastructure for speed, efficiency, scalability, and performance per watt to unlock AI's real-world potential. The era of AI inference has arrived. Imagine a healthcare system analyzing millions of data points in real time to accelerate life-saving medical research, or an intelligent assistant instantly resolving thousands of complex customer needs at once. These real-world breakthroughs rely on advanced infrastructure acting as the engine of continuous intelligence, powering real-time services while also supporting an increasingly intelligent edge of IoT and consumer devices. However, in this inference-driven landscape, every delay, bottleneck, or wasted watt directly affects human outcomes and operating costs. This shift changes what infrastructure must deliver.


The accountability vacuum: Agentic AI in high-stakes domains

AIHub

Agentic AI is no longer a research artifact. These systems are embedded in live infrastructure, clinical workflows, and legal processes: deleting databases, advising patients, and generating legal documents. Wrong outputs cannot simply be taken back. The central question has shifted from whether these systems are ready to make consequential decisions to who is accountable when they get those decisions wrong. The standard apparatus of fault-finding (identifying an actor, establishing a duty, connecting a breach to an injury) was built for a world in which agents are human, decisions are sequential, and causation is legible.


Tech Visionary Says the Big AI Labs Don't Get What People Want

WIRED

Tech Visionary Says the Big AI Labs Don't Get What People Want Tim O'Reilly built a publishing empire that AI is helping to destroy. Yet he loves AI--as long as it's open source. Tim O'Reilly's yardstick for measuring the worth of a company, person, or society has long been It's no surprise that O'Reilly-- publisher, internet pioneer, VC, conference organizer, and dispenser of tech wisdom --is applying that metric to the way people design and use AI. Specifically, he's pushing for a future where open-source AI is an elixir for the masses. He worries that, like Microsoft in the 1990s, today's hyperscalers are trying to lock users into their products.


Sparky Linux just restored 32-bit support - why that still matters

ZDNet

I wore the world's first HDR10 smart glasses TCL's new E Ink tablet beats the Remarkable and Kindle Anker's new charger is one of the most unique I've ever seen I wore the world's first HDR10 smart glasses TCL's new E Ink tablet beats the Remarkable and Kindle Anker's new charger is one of the most unique I've ever seen Don't throw it away - Sparky Linux has decided not to give up on the aging architecture. Every PC sold today is 64-bit. In fact, one of the last true 32-bit-only CPUs was the Pentium 4 Northwood chip, which was available for purchase between 2000 and 2008. I can't remember the last time I actually saw a 32-bit-only machine. Couple that with Microsoft ending support for Office 365 on 32-bit architecture this December, and it's pretty simple to conclude that 32-bit PCs are done.


CogTwin: A framework for adaptable digital twins

AIHub

CogTwin is a hybrid cognitive architecture framework designed to bring autonomous reasoning and real-time adaptation to digital twin systems. Presented at IJCAI 2025, this work aims to advance the state of digital twin technology by addressing key gaps in autonomy, cognition, and real-time decision-making. Digital twin technology has transformed how complex systems are managed, from smart cities to industrial processes. However, most current digital twins remain fundamentally reactive: they rely on pre-programmed rules and static data-driven models, and therefore struggle when confronted with unforeseen events or evolving conditions. Real-time learning, reasoning, and adaptation - hallmarks of human cognition - are largely absent.


Nvidia Wants to Own Every Chip Inside AI Data Centers

WIRED

Nvidia's Vera Rubin platform combines CPUs and GPUs into a single system, reflecting the company's growing ambition to power every layer of AI infrastructure. Nvidia is hyping up its new Vera Rubin chip system this week, revealing new performance benchmarks for the GPU and CPU combo ahead of rival AMD's annual product event in San Francisco on Thursday. During a lengthy technical workshop last week at the company's headquarters in Santa Clara, California, Nvidia executives boasted to a small group of journalists about the chip system's increased power and efficiency capabilities. The biggest takeaway: Nvidia, which has long specialized in making GPUs, is increasingly trying to position itself as a supplier of CPUs that can power AI agents. While GPUs are still the main hardware that companies use to train and run their AI models, the industry's shift toward more complex, agentic systems has increased demand for CPUs, which can orchestrate data flows, networking, and other software tasks.


AI Isn't Smarter Than a Baby--Yet

WIRED

Babies are tremendous learning machines, and key advances for AI may soon be found in the architecture of their little brains. If you think an artificial intelligence model running on thousands of cutting-edge computer chips is smart, allow me to introduce you to the concept of a 1-year-old. OK, so babies might not be able to write computer programs, solve advanced math problems, or debate philosophical ideas. But unlike today's AI models, which consume an ocean's worth of training data and as much energy as a small country, babies learn to make sense of the world with amazing efficiency. They identify new objects after seeing them once or twice, and they learn through fleeting observation and physical interaction. When it comes to improving AI, babies--and the architecture of their brains--might hold crucial insights.


The foundational elements of AI architecture that IT leaders need to scale

MIT Technology Review

Discover four foundational elements of AI architecture that will endure as models continue to advance: data quality, context engineering, governance, and human expertise. With the rapid progress of AI capabilities and the move to agentic systems, organizations are expanding their use cases as the technology continues to grow. That constant evolution also introduces risk, leaving IT leaders to wonder which investments will prove valuable even six months into the future. Returning to the foundational elements of AI architecture--the structural framework required for deploying and managing reliable, integrated AI systems at scale--allows technology leaders to make astute decisions today while supporting a future of AI agents that can retrieve information, make decisions, and execute complex workflows across systems. The following capabilities provide a stable compass on the path to production-ready deployment, regardless of how the underlying technology evolves. Models are only as reliable as the data they can access, and poor data quality leads to AI hallucinations, bias, and unreliable outputs.


Neural Network-Based Estimation of Time-Dependent Parameters in AR(p) Processes

arXiv.org Machine Learning

We investigate a forecasting framework based on a simple discrete-time dynamic model with coefficients varying in time. The parameters of the model are recovered within a deep learning framework, which makes it possible to retain a transparent parametric structure while simultaneously accounting for complex and nonstationary patterns in the observed phenomenon. Our analysis covers two specifications of the noise process. Besides the standard Gaussian setting, we also consider Laplace-distributed noise, which can offer a more adequate description in the presence of heavier tails and sharper local fluctuations. For both cases, we formulate the predictive scheme of the model and analyze the associated uncertainty quantification, including the construction of prediction intervals. The results illustrate that a relatively simple model, when combined with time-dependent parameter estimation, can serve as a mathematically tractable and practically flexible tool for forecasting complex dynamics under different noise assumptions. The general model is stated for TVAR($p$), while the prediction-interval formulas and the numerical experiments are developed for the TVAR(1) case.


Convolutional Symmetric AutoEncoders: enhancing latent stability via differential geometry

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Autoencoders (AEs) have emerged as powerful tools for non-linear dimensionality reduction, often surpassing traditional linear methods such as Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) in scenarios characterized by slowly decaying Kolmogorov $n$-widths. In the realm of Reduced-Order Modelling (ROM), these models are increasingly utilized to learn low-dimensional representations of solution manifolds associated with parametric Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). However, the high expressivity of AEs presents a challenge: although trained networks typically minimize reconstruction error, they often struggle to capture the essential properties necessary for building accurate and robust ROMs. Recent works by arXiv:2307.15288v2 and arXiv:2506.11641v1 have tackled this challenge in fully connected AEs by proposing representation-consistent architectures, which preserve some of the properties belonging to POD. This study builds upon that concept by extending representation consistency for convolutional layers. We introduce a novel class of symmetric Convolutional AutoEncoders (CAEs) designed to embody the primary properties of manifold parametrization mappings. When integrated into a ROM framework, this architecture demonstrates significantly improved predictive capabilities. Specifically, we compared the performance of the ROMs based on classical and symmetric CAEs on three one dimensional academic test cases, namely the Linear Advection, the Viscous Burger and the Kuramoto Sivashinsky equation. Numerical results demonstrate that our proposed symmetric approach consistently yields more accurate latent trajectories, lower reconstruction errors, and enhanced model robustness.