arcadia
Arcadia: Toward a Full-Lifecycle Framework for Embodied Lifelong Learning
Gao, Minghe, Li, Juncheng, Lin, Yuze, Liu, Xuqi, Ji, Jiaming, Pan, Xiaoran, Xu, Zihan, Li, Xian, Li, Mingjie, Ji, Wei, Wei, Rong, Tang, Rui, Wang, Qizhou, Shen, Kai, Xiao, Jun, Wu, Qi, Tang, Siliang, Zhuang, Yueting
W e contend that embodied learning is fundamentally a life-cycle problem rather than a single-stage optimization. Systems that optimize only one link (data collection, simulation, learning, or deployment) rarely sustain improvement or generalize beyond narrow settings. W e introduce Arcadia, a closed-loop framework that operational-izes embodied lifelong learning by tightly coupling four stages: (1) Self-evolving exploration and grounding for autonomous data acquisition in physical environments, (2) Generative scene reconstruction and augmentation for realistic and extensible scene creation, (3) a Shared embodied representation architecture that unifies navigation and manipulation within a single multimodal backbone, and (4) Sim-from-real evaluation and evolution that closes the feedback loop through simulation-based adaptation. This coupling is non-decomposable: removing any stage breaks the improvement loop and reverts to one-shot training. Arcadia delivers consistent gains on navigation and manipulation benchmarks and transfers robustly to physical robots, indicating that a tightly coupled lifecycle: continuous real-world data acquisition, generative simulation update, and shared-representation learning, supports lifelong improvement and end-to-end generalization. W e release standardized interfaces enabling reproducible evaluation and cross-model comparison in reusable environments, positioning Arcadia as a scalable foundation for general-purpose embodied agents.
- Research Report (0.82)
- Instructional Material (0.61)
ARCADIA: Scalable Causal Discovery for Corporate Bankruptcy Analysis Using Agentic AI
Maturo, Fabrizio, Riccio, Donato, Mazzitelli, Andrea, Bifulco, Giuseppe, Paolone, Francesco, Brezeanu, Iulia
Iteration 1 uses a broad, data-driven prior; subsequent iterations exploit memory to execute focused, theory-driven repairs, steadily converging on a causally defensible graph. This iterative loop is made explicit in Algorithm 1, while the statistics used during Evaluate are summarised in Table 2 and computed procedurally in Algorithm 2. 3.1. Causal Assumptions Every proposed DAG must explicitly address the four core assumptions required for causal identification. First, regarding unobserved confounding, the agent must state which latent factors remain and how observed variables serve as proxies for these unobserved influences. Second, the positivity assumption requires that the agent argue no sub-population is locked into or out of the treatment, often demonstrated by reporting overlap in the propensity-score distribution across treatment groups.
- North America > United States (0.05)
- Europe > Italy > Lazio > Rome (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Banking & Finance (1.00)
- Law > Business Law (0.46)
Your Town's Local History Books Have a Very Secret and Powerful New Buyer
Arcadia Publishing built its empire on small-town storytellers. Now it wants to sell their words to an A.I. company no one will name. Enter your email to receive alerts for this author. You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time. You're already subscribed to the aa_Nitish_Pahwa newsletter. You can manage your newsletter subscriptions at any time.
- North America > United States > New York (0.05)
- North America > United States > Wyoming (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Law > Litigation (0.69)
- Law > Intellectual Property & Technology Law (0.69)
- Government (0.69)
- Information Technology > Services (0.46)