Machine learning surrogates are increasingly employed to replace expensive computational models for physics-based reliability analysis. However, their use introduces epistemic uncertainty from model approximation errors, which couples with aleatory uncertainty in model inputs, potentially compromising the accuracy of reliability predictions. This study proposes a Gauss-Hermite quadrature approach to decouple these nested uncertainties and enable more accurate reliability analysis. The method evaluates conditional failure probabilities under aleatory uncertainty using First and Second Order Reliability Methods and then integrates these probabilities across realizations of epistemic uncertainty. Three examples demonstrate that the proposed approach maintains computational efficiency while yielding more trustworthy predictions than traditional methods that ignore model uncertainty.

Knowledge Tracing (KT) is crucial in education assessment, which focuses on depicting students' learning states and assessing students' mastery of subjects. With the rise of modern online learning platforms, particularly massive open online courses (MOOCs), an abundance of interaction data has greatly advanced the development of the KT technology. Previous research commonly adopts deterministic representation to capture students' knowledge states, which neglects the uncertainty during student interactions and thus fails to model the true knowledge state in learning process. In light of this, we propose an Uncertainty-Aware Knowledge Tracing model (UKT) which employs stochastic distribution embeddings to represent the uncertainty in student interactions, with a Wasserstein self-attention mechanism designed to capture the transition of state distribution in student learning behaviors. Additionally, we introduce the aleatory uncertainty-aware contrastive learning loss, which strengthens the model's robustness towards different types of uncertainties. Extensive experiments on six real-world datasets demonstrate that UKT not only significantly surpasses existing deep learning-based models in KT prediction, but also shows unique advantages in handling the uncertainty of student interactions.

Exploration is a significant challenge in practical reinforcement learning (RL), and uncertainty-aware exploration that incorporates the quantification of epistemic and aleatory uncertainty has been recognized as an effective exploration strategy. However, capturing the combined effect of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty for decision-making is difficult. Existing works estimate aleatory and epistemic uncertainty separately and consider the composite uncertainty as an additive combination of the two. Nevertheless, the additive formulation leads to excessive risk-taking behavior, causing instability. In this paper, we propose an algorithm that clarifies the theoretical connection between aleatory and epistemic uncertainty, unifies aleatory and epistemic uncertainty estimation, and quantifies the combined effect of both uncertainties for a risk-sensitive exploration. Our method builds on a novel extension of distributional RL that estimates a parameterized return distribution whose parameters are random variables encoding epistemic uncertainty. Experimental results on tasks with exploration and risk challenges show that our method outperforms alternative approaches.

The sixth assessment of the international panel on climate change (IPCC) states that "cumulative net CO2 emissions over the last decade (2010-2019) are about the same size as the 11 remaining carbon budget likely to limit warming to 1.5C (medium confidence)." Such reports directly feed the public discourse, but nuances such as the degree of belief and of confidence are often lost. In this paper, we propose a formal account for allowing such degrees of belief and the associated confidence to be used to label arguments in abstract argumentation settings. Differently from other proposals in probabilistic argumentation, we focus on the task of probabilistic inference over a chosen query building upon Sato's distribution semantics which has been already shown to encompass a variety of cases including the semantics of Bayesian networks. Borrowing from the vast literature on such semantics, we examine how such tasks can be dealt with in practice when considering uncertain probabilities, and discuss the connections with existing proposals for probabilistic argumentation.

Deep learning has achieved impressive performance on many tasks in recent years. However, it has been found that it is still not enough for deep neural networks to provide only point estimates. For high-risk tasks, we need to assess the reliability of the model predictions. This requires us to quantify the uncertainty of model prediction and construct prediction intervals. In this paper, We explore the uncertainty in deep learning to construct the prediction intervals. In general, We comprehensively consider two categories of uncertainties: aleatory uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty. We design a special loss function, which enables us to learn uncertainty without uncertainty label. We only need to supervise the learning of regression task. We learn the aleatory uncertainty implicitly from the loss function. And that epistemic uncertainty is accounted for in ensembled form. Our method correlates the construction of prediction intervals with the uncertainty estimation. Impressive results on some publicly available datasets show that the performance of our method is competitive with other state-of-the-art methods.

Digital twins are emerging in many industries, typically consisting of simulation models and data associated with a specific physical system. One of the main reasons for developing a digital twin, is to enable the simulation of possible consequences of a given action, without the need to interfere with the physical system itself. Physical systems of interest, and the environments they operate in, do not always behave deterministically. Moreover, information about the system and its environment is typically incomplete or imperfect. Probabilistic representations of systems and environments may therefore be called for, especially to support decisions in application areas where actions may have severe consequences. In this paper we introduce the probabilistic digital twin (PDT). We will start by discussing how epistemic uncertainty can be treated using measure theory, by modelling epistemic information via $\sigma$-algebras. Based on this, we give a formal definition of how epistemic uncertainty can be updated in a PDT. We then study the problem of optimal sequential decision making. That is, we consider the case where the outcome of each decision may inform the next. Within the PDT framework, we formulate this optimization problem. We discuss how this problem may be solved (at least in theory) via the maximum principle method or the dynamic programming principle. However, due to the curse of dimensionality, these methods are often not tractable in practice. To mend this, we propose a generic approximate solution using deep reinforcement learning together with neural networks defined on sets. We illustrate the method on a practical problem, considering optimal information gathering for the estimation of a failure probability.

In a data-scarce field such as healthcare, where models often deliver predictions on patients with rare conditions, the ability to measure the uncertainty of a model's prediction could potentially lead to improved effectiveness of decision support tools and increased user trust. This work advances the understanding of uncertainty estimation for classification and risk prediction on medical tabular data, in a two-fold way. First, we expand and refine the set of heuristics to select an uncertainty estimation technique, introducing tests for clinically-relevant scenarios such as generalization to uncommon pathologies, changes in clinical protocol and simulations of corrupted data. We furthermore differentiate these heuristics depending on the clinical use-case. Second, we observe that ensembles and related techniques perform poorly when it comes to detecting out-of-domain examples, a critical task which is carried out more successfully by auto-encoders. These remarks are enriched by considerations of the interplay of uncertainty estimation with class imbalance, post-modeling calibration and other modeling procedures. Our findings are supported by an array of experiments on toy and real-world data.