The current approach for new Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) and Connected and Automated Driving (CAD) function development involves a significant amount of public road testing which is inefficient due to the number miles that need to be driven for rare and extreme events to take place, thereby being very costly also, and unsafe as the rest of the road users become involuntary test subjects. A new development, evaluation and demonstration method for safe, efficient, and repeatable development, demonstration and evaluation of ADAS and CAD functions called VehicleInVirtualEnvironment (VVE) was recently introduced as a solution to this problem. The vehicle is operated in a large, empty, and flat area during VVE while its localization and perception sensor data is fed from the virtual environment with other traffic and rare and extreme events being generated as needed. The virtual environment can be easily configured and modified to construct different testing scenarios on demand. This paper focuses on the VVE approach and introduces the coordinate transformations needed to sync pose (location and orientation) in the virtual and physical worlds and handling of localization and perception sensor data using the highly realistic 3D simulation model of a recent autonomous shuttle deployment site in Columbus, Ohio as the virtual world. As a further example that uses multiple actors, the use of VVE for VehicleToVRU communication based Vulnerable Road User (VRU) safety is presented in the paper using VVE experiments and real pedestrian(s) in a safe and repeatable manner. VVE experiments are used to demonstrate the efficacy of the method.

This paper presents an evaluation of two different Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) applications, namely Red Light Violation Warning (RLVW) and Green Light Optimized Speed Advisory (GLOSA). The evaluation method is to first develop and use Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) simulator testing, followed by extension of the HIL testing to road testing using an experimental connected vehicle. The HIL simulator used in the testing is a state-of-the-art simulator that consists of the same hardware like the road side unit and traffic cabinet as is used in real intersections and allows testing of numerous different traffic and intersection geometry and timing scenarios realistically. First, the RLVW V2I algorithm is tested in the HIL simulator and then implemented in an On-Board-Unit (OBU) in our experimental vehicle and tested at real world intersections. This same approach of HIL testing followed by testing in real intersections using our experimental vehicle is later extended to the GLOSA application. The GLOSA application that is tested in this paper has both an optimal speed advisory for passing at the green light and also includes a red light violation warning system. The paper presents the HIL and experimental vehicle evaluation systems, information about RLVW and GLOSA and HIL simulation and road testing results and their interpretations.

Autonomous vehicle path following performance is one of significant consideration. This paper presents discrete time design of robust PD controlled system with disturbance observer (DOB) and communication disturbance observer (CDOB) compensation to enhance autonomous vehicle path following performance. Although always implemented on digital devices, DOB and CDOB structure are usually designed in continuous time in the literature and also in our previous work. However, it requires high sampling rate for continuous-time design block diagram to automatically convert to corresponding discrete-time controller using rapid controller prototyping systems. In this paper, direct discrete time design is carried out. Digital PD feedback controller is designed based on the nominal plant using the proposed parameter space approach. Zero order hold method is applied to discretize the nominal plant, DOB and CDOB structure in continuous domain. Discrete time DOB is embedded into the steering to path following error loop for model regulation in the presence of uncertainty in vehicle parameters such as vehicle mass, vehicle speed and road-tire friction coefficient and rejecting external disturbance like crosswind force. On the other hand, time delay from CAN bus based sensor and actuator command interfaces results in degradation of system performance since large negative phase angles are added to the plant frequency response. Discrete time CDOB compensated control system can be used for time delay compensation where the accurate knowledge of delay time value is not necessary. A validated model of our lab Ford Fusion hybrid automated driving research vehicle is used for the simulation analysis while the vehicle is driving at high speed. Simulation results successfully demonstrate the improvement of autonomous vehicle path following performance with the proposed discrete time DOB and CDOB structure.

Connected vehicle (CV) technology is among the most heavily researched areas in both the academia and industry. The vehicle to vehicle (V2V), vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) and vehicle to pedestrian (V2P) communication capabilities enable critical situational awareness. In some cases, these vehicle communication safety capabilities can overcome the shortcomings of other sensor safety capabilities because of external conditions such as 'No Line of Sight' (NLOS) or very harsh weather conditions. Connected vehicles will help cities and states reduce traffic congestion, improve fuel efficiency and improve the safety of the vehicles and pedestrians. On the road, cars will be able to communicate with one another, automatically transmitting data such as speed, position, and direction, and send alerts to each other if a crash seems imminent. The main focus of this paper is the implementation of Cooperative Collision Avoidance (CCA) for connected vehicles. It leverages the Vehicle to Everything (V2X) communication technology to create a real-time implementable collision avoidance algorithm along with decision-making for a vehicle that communicates with other vehicles. Four distinct collision risk environments are simulated on a cost effective Connected Autonomous Vehicle (CAV) Hardware in the Loop (HIL) simulator to test the overall algorithm in real-time with real electronic control and communication hardware.

Low speed autonomous shuttles emulating SAE Level L4 automated driving using human driver assisted autonomy have been operating in geo-fenced areas in several cities in the US and the rest of the world. These autonomous vehicles (AV) are operated by small to mid-sized technology companies that do not have the resources of automotive OEMs for carrying out exhaustive, comprehensive testing of their AV technology solutions before public road deployment. Due to the low speed of operation and hence not operating on roads containing highways, the base vehicles of these AV shuttles are not required to go through rigorous certification tests. The way the driver assisted AV technology is tested and allowed for public road deployment is continuously evolving but is not standardized and shows differences between the different states where these vehicles operate. Currently, AVs and AV shuttles deployed on public roads are using these deployments for testing and improving their technology. However, this is not the right approach. Safe and extensive testing in a lab and controlled test environment including Model-in-the-Loop (MiL), Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) and Autonomous-Vehicle-in-the-Loop (AViL) testing should be the prerequisite to such public road deployments. This paper presents three dimensional virtual modeling of an AV shuttle deployment site and simulation testing in this virtual environment. We have two deployment sites in Columbus of these AV shuttles through the Department of Transportation funded Smart City Challenge project named Smart Columbus. The Linden residential area AV shuttle deployment site of Smart Columbus is used as the specific example for illustrating the AV testing method proposed in this paper.

Increasing the implemented SAE level of autonomy in road vehicles requires extensive simulations and verifications in a realistic simulation environment before proving ground and public road testing. The level of detail in the simulation environment helps ensure the safety of a real-world implementation and reduces algorithm development cost by allowing developers to complete most of the validation in the simulation environment. Considering sensors like camera, LIDAR, radar, and V2X used in autonomous vehicles, it is essential to create a simulation environment that can provide these sensor simulations as realistically as possible. While sensor simulations are of crucial importance for perception algorithm development, the simulation environment will be incomplete for the simulation of holistic AV operation without being complemented by a realistic vehicle dynamic model and traffic cosimulation. Therefore, this paper investigates existing simulation environments, identifies use case scenarios, and creates a cosimulation environment to satisfy the simulation requirements for autonomous driving function development using the Carla simulator based on the Unreal game engine for the environment, Sumo or Vissim for traffic co-simulation, Carsim or Matlab, Simulink for vehicle dynamics co-simulation and Autoware or the author or user routines for autonomous driving algorithm co-simulation. As a result of this work, a model-based vehicle dynamics simulation with realistic sensor simulation and traffic simulation is presented. A sensor fusion methodology is implemented in the created simulation environment as a use case scenario. The results of this work will be a valuable resource for researchers who need a comprehensive co-simulation environment to develop connected and autonomous driving algorithms.

This paper is on the automated driving architecture and operation of a light commercial vehicle. Simple longitudinal and lateral dynamic models of the vehicle and a more detailed CarSim model are developed and used in simulations and controller design and evaluation. Experimental validation is used to make sure that the models used represent the actual response of the vehicle as closely as possible. The vehicle is made drive-by-wire by interfacing with the existing throttle-by-wire, by adding an active vacuum booster for brake-by-wire and by adding a steering actuator for steer-by-wire operation. Vehicle localization is achieved by using a GPS sensor integrated with six axes IMU with a built-in INS algorithm and a digital compass for heading information. Front looking radar, lidar and camera are used for environmental sensing. Communication with the road infrastructure and other vehicles is made possible by a vehicle to vehicle communication modem. A dedicated computer under real time Linux is used to collect, process and distribute sensor information. A dSPACE MicroAutoBox is used for drive-by-wire controls. CACC based longitudinal control and path tracking of a map of GPS waypoints are used to present the operation of this automated driving vehicle.

When autonomous vehicles also use on-board units which are vehicular to everything communication modems, they become connected and autonomous vehicles (CAV) [1]. Due to their increasing availability, CAVs have been the focus of both academic and industry research for a while and, as a result, there are is lot of research on autonomous driving function controls [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9],;10], [11] and their higher level decision-making algorithms [12], [13], [14], [15]. Planning and decision making are the core functions for an autonomous vehicle for driving on the road safely and efficiently under different traffic scenarios. As discussed in [16], the decision making and planning algorithms for autonomous vehicles are aiming at solving significant problems in autonomous driving, like (a) determining the future path, (b) utilizing observations of the surrounding environment from the perception system, (c) acting properly when interacting with other road users, (d) instructing lowlevel controller of the vehicle and (e) ensuring autonomous driving is safe and efficient. Therefore, the planning and decision making affects the autonomous vehicle decisively. Depending on the traffic scenario, autonomous driving functions are designed for highway driving, off-road driving and urban driving. The research for highway driving and off-road driving have been going on for a long time and with many results on planning and decision making. Yet, due to the complexity of the urban traffic scenario, the decision making and planning for urban traffic environment has always been very challenging with many unsolved problems. The complexity of the urban traffic scenario is manifested in the following aspects which are discussed next.

Autonomous driving feedback control loops [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9],;10], [11] and decision-making systems [12], [13], [14], [15] depend on the effectiveness of information collection and learning the knowledge of vehicle motions, including the ego-vehicle and other nearby vehicles. Knowing the information, the autonomous vehicles can estimate the behaviors and future positions of others so as to determine the way of behaving in current traffic scenario. Therefore, the knowledge of vehicles at current moment on motions and states are particularly essential for autonomous driving. As for autonomous vehicles driving on the road, the sensor suite deployed on them commonly includes GPS, IMU, Lidars, Cameras and Radars. With the information collected from GPS and IMU, the ego vehicle can measure its states, including the global position, the heading angle that shows the orientation, the linear velocity and angular velocity as well as acceleration.

Autonomous vehicle (AV) algorithms need to be tested extensively in order to make sure the vehicle and the passengers will be safe while using it after the implementation. Testing these algorithms in real world create another important safety critical point. Real world testing is also subjected to limitations such as logistic limitations to carry or drive the vehicle to a certain location. For this purpose, hardware in the loop (HIL) simulations as well as virtual environments such as CARLA and LG SVL are used widely. This paper discusses a method that combines the real vehicle with the virtual world, called vehicle in virtual environment (VVE). This method projects the vehicle location and heading into a virtual world for desired testing, and transfers back the information from sensors in the virtual world to the vehicle. As a result, while vehicle is moving in the real world, it simultaneously moves in the virtual world and obtains the situational awareness via multiple virtual sensors. This would allow testing in a safe environment with the real vehicle while providing some additional benefits on vehicle dynamics fidelity, logistics limitations and passenger experience testing. The paper also demonstrates an example case study where path following and the virtual sensors are utilized to test a radar based stopping algorithm.