Breast cancer remains one of the leading causes of mortality among women worldwide, with early diagnosis being critical for effective treatment and improved survival rates. However, timely detection continues to be a challenge due to the complex nature of the disease and variability in patient risk factors . This study presents a fuzzy soft set theory - based expert system designed to assess the risk of breast cancer in patients using measurable clinical and physiological parameters. The proposed system integrates Body Mass Index (BMI), Insulin Level (IL), Lep tin Level (LL), Adiponectin Level (AL), and age as input variables to estimate breast cancer risk through a set of fuzzy inference rules and soft set computations. These parameters can be obtained from routine blood analyses, enabling a non - invasive and ac cessible method for preliminary assessment. The dataset used for model development and validation was obtained from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. The proposed expert system aims to support healthcare professionals in identifying high - risk patients a nd determining the necessity of further diagnostic procedures such as biopsies.

Modeling systems that exhibit both continuous and discontinuous state changes presents a significant challenge in machine learning. For instance, biological spiking networks feature the continuous decay of neuron potentials alongside discontinuous spikes, which cause abrupt increases in the potentials of neighboring downstream neurons. Designing appropriate objective functions and applying gradient methods that work with these discontinuities are among the difficulties of working with such systems. Traditionally, ordinary and partial differential equations (ODEs and PDEs) are used to model continuous state changes, while Markov decision processes (MDPs) are employed to capture discrete actions that drive environmental transitions. In this paper, we study Action-Driven Processes (ADPs), also known as generalized semi-Markov processes [12, 5, 16], which unify both types of dynamics within a single framework. With continuous-time states and actions at the core of ADPs, a natural question is whether it is possible to learn optimal policies for action selection using traditional reinforcement learning methods. The control-as-inference tutorial [9] elegantly demonstrated that maximum entropy reinforcement learning can be formulated as minimizing the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between (a) a true trajectory distribution generated by action-state transitions and the policy, and (b) a model trajectory distribution that depends on the reward function.

Public research results on large-scale supervised finetuning of AI agents remain relatively rare, since the collection of agent training data presents unique challenges. In this work, we argue that the bottleneck is not a lack of underlying data sources, but that a large variety of data is fragmented across heterogeneous formats, tools, and interfaces. To this end, we introduce the agent data protocol (ADP), a light-weight representation language that serves as an "interlingua" between agent datasets in diverse formats and unified agent training pipelines downstream. The design of ADP is expressive enough to capture a large variety of tasks, including API/tool use, browsing, coding, software engineering, and general agen-tic workflows, while remaining simple to parse and train on without engineering at a per-dataset level. In experiments, we unified a broad collection of 13 existing agent training datasets into ADP format, and converted the standardized ADP data into training-ready formats for multiple agent frameworks. We performed SFT on these data, and demonstrated an average performance gain of 20% over corresponding base models, and delivers state-of-the-art or near-SOT A performance on standard coding, browsing, tool use, and research benchmarks, without domain-specific tuning. All code and data are released publicly, in the hope that ADP could help lower the barrier to standardized, scalable, and reproducible agent training. In contrast, post-training presents a much harder challenge: high-quality task-specific data must be carefully curated.

This paper investigates the fragility of contribution evaluation in federated learning, a critical mechanism for ensuring fairness and incentivizing participation. We argue that contribution scores are susceptible to significant distortions from two fundamental perspectives: architectural sensitivity and intentional manipulation. First, we explore how different model aggregation methods impact these scores. While most research assumes a basic averaging approach, we demonstrate that advanced techniques, including those designed to handle unreliable or diverse clients, can unintentionally yet significantly alter the final scores. Second, we explore vulnerabilities posed by poisoning attacks, where malicious participants strategically manipulate their model updates to inflate their own contribution scores or reduce the importance of other participants. Through extensive experiments across diverse datasets and model architectures, implemented within the Flower framework, we rigorously show that both the choice of aggregation method and the presence of attackers are potent vectors for distorting contribution scores, highlighting a critical need for more robust evaluation schemes.

Robotic manipulation with Vision-Language-Action models requires efficient inference over long-horizon multi-modal context, where attention to dense visual tokens dominates computational cost. Existing methods optimize inference speed by reducing visual redundancy within VLA models, but they overlook the varying redundancy across robotic manipulation stages. We observe that the visual token redundancy is higher in coarse manipulation phase than in fine-grained operations, and is strongly correlated with the action dynamic. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{A}ction-aware \textbf{D}ynamic \textbf{P}runing (\textbf{ADP}), a multi-modal pruning framework that integrates text-driven token selection with action-aware trajectory gating. Our method introduces a gating mechanism that conditions the pruning signal on recent action trajectories, using past motion windows to adaptively adjust token retention ratios in accordance with dynamics, thereby balancing computational efficiency and perceptual precision across different manipulation stages. Extensive experiments on the LIBERO suites and diverse real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method significantly reduces FLOPs and action inference latency (\textit{e.g.} $1.35 \times$ speed up on OpenVLA-OFT) while maintaining competitive success rates (\textit{e.g.} 25.8\% improvements with OpenVLA) compared to baselines, thereby providing a simple plug-in path to efficient robot policies that advances the efficiency and performance frontier of robotic manipulation. Our project website is: \href{https://vla-adp.github.io/}{ADP.com}.

Utilizing global information to reduce the complexity of imperfect-information games has also been investigated in some works. In their implementation, the value network of the agent can observe the full information about the game state, including those that are hidden from the policy. They argue that such a training style improves training performance. Moreover, in Suphx [15], a strong Mahjong AI system, they used a similar method namely oracle guiding. Particularly, in the beginning of the training stage, all global information is utilized; then, as the training goes, the additional information would be dropped out slowly to none, and only the information that the agent is allowed to observe is reserved in the subsequent training stage.

Alignment techniques enable Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate outputs that align with human preferences and play a crucial role in their effectiveness. However, their impact often diminishes when applied to Small Language Models (SLMs), likely due to the limited capacity of these models. Instead of directly applying existing alignment techniques to SLMs, we propose to utilize a well-aligned teacher LLM to guide the alignment process for these models, thereby facilitating the transfer of the teacher's knowledge of human preferences to the student model. To achieve this, we first explore a straightforward approach, Dual-Constrained Knowledge Distillation (DCKD), that employs knowledge distillation with two KL-divergence constraints from the aligned teacher to the unaligned student. To further enhance the student's ability to distinguish between preferred and dispreferred responses, we then propose Advantage-Guided Distillation for Preference Alignment (ADPA), which leverages an advantage function from the aligned teacher to deliver more nuanced, distribution-level reward signals for the student's alignment. Our experimental results show that these two approaches appreciably improve the alignment of SLMs and narrow the performance gap with larger counterparts. Among them, ADPA demonstrates superior performance and achieves even greater effectiveness when integrated with DCKD. Our code is available at https://github.com/SLIT-AI/ADPA.