Government
Mining Meaning from Wikipedia
Medelyan, Olena, Milne, David, Legg, Catherine, Witten, Ian H.
Wikipedia is a goldmine of information; not just for its many readers, but also for the growing community of researchers who recognize it as a resource of exceptional scale and utility. It represents a vast investment of manual effort and judgment: a huge, constantly evolving tapestry of concepts and relations that is being applied to a host of tasks. This article provides a comprehensive description of this work. It focuses on research that extracts and makes use of the concepts, relations, facts and descriptions found in Wikipedia, and organizes the work into four broad categories: applying Wikipedia to natural language processing; using it to facilitate information retrieval and information extraction; and as a resource for ontology building. The article addresses how Wikipedia is being used as is, how it is being improved and adapted, and how it is being combined with other structures to create entirely new resources. We identify the research groups and individuals involved, and how their work has developed in the last few years. We provide a comprehensive list of the open-source software they have produced.
AAAI-08 and IAAI-08 Conferences Provide Focal Point for AI
Hedberg, Sara Reese (Emergent, In.c)
This summer's AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-08) and its sister Conference on Innovative Applications of AI (IAAI-08) continued their long tradition of being a focal point of AI. This year's conferences were held in Chicago at the Hyatt Regency McCormick Place, July 13-17, 2008. The multidimensional conference offerings included nine invited talks, 251 technical papers, 22 innovative applications of AI papers, three competitions (poker, AI video, and general game playing), three special tracks (AI and the web, integrated intelligence, and physically grounded AI), 15 tutorials, 15 workshops, and 11 intelligent system demonstrations, as well as a number of awards, a doctoral consortium, student poster session and programs, and a vendor exhibit. This translated into a plethora of choices for the 921 conference attendees. An additional 175 people exclusively attended the tutorials, workshops, or exhibit.
The Seventeenth Annual AAAI Robot Exhibition and Manipulation and Mobility Workshop
Anderson, Monica (The University of Alabama) | Jenkins, Odest Chadwicke (Brown University) | Oh, Paul (Drexel University)
Moving toward true robot autonomy may require new paradigms, hardware, and ways of thinking. The goal of the AAAI 2008 Workshop on Mobility and Manipulation was not only to demonstrate current research successes to the AAAI community but also to road-map future mobility and manipulation challenges that create synergies between artificial intelligence and robotics. The half-day workshop included both a session on the exhibits and a panel discussion. The panel consisted of five prominent researchers who led a discussion of future directions for mobility and manipulation research. Andrew Ng of Stanford University (along with students Ashutosh Saxena and Ellen Klingbeil) focuses on opening arbitrary doors through learning a few visual keypoints, such as the location and type of door handle.
The 2008 Scheduling and Planning Applications Workshop (SPARK'08)
Castillo, Luis (University of Granada) | Cortellessa, Gabriella (ISTC-CNR) | Yorke-Smith, Neil (SRI International)
SPARK'08 was the first edition of a workshop series designed to provide a stable, longterm forum where researchers could discuss Workshop (SPARK) was established to help address this issue. Building on precursory events, SPARK'08 was the first workshop designed Scheduling (ICAPS-08) held in Sydney, Australia, in September 2008. Like its immediate predecessor (the ICAPS'07 Workshop on Moving Planning and Scheduling Systems), the 2008 SPARK workshop was collocated with the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), a premier forum for research in AI planning and scheduling, and the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP). A handful of outstanding application-oriented papers are presented each year at the ICAPS conference. Time and again, in invited talks and in open microphone discussion sessions such as ICAPS's Festivus (where conference participants air their grievances in an open and entertaining way), researchers have lamented the small number of applications papers accepted at conferences such as ICAPS, CP, and the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
AAAI 2008 Workshop Reports
Anand, Sarabjot Singh (University of Warwick) | Bunescu, Razvan C. (Ohio University) | Carvalho, Vitor R. (Microsoft Live Labs) | Chomicki, Jan (University of Buffalo) | Conitzer, Vincent (Duke University) | Cox, Michael T. (BBN Technologies) | Dignum, Virginia (Utrecht University) | Dodds, Zachary (Harvey Mudd College) | Dredze, Mark (University of Pennsylvania) | Furcy, David (University of Wisconsin Oshkosh) | Gabrilovich, Evgeniy (Yahoo! Research) | Göker, Mehmet H. (PricewaterhouseCoopers) | Guesgen, Hans Werner (Massey University) | Hirsh, Haym (Rutgers University) | Jannach, Dietmar (Dortmund University of Technology) | Junker, Ulrich (ILOG) | Ketter, Wolfgang (Erasmus University) | Kobsa, Alfred (University of California, Irvine) | Koenig, Sven (University of Southern California) | Lau, Tessa (IBM Almaden Research Center) | Lewis, Lundy (Southern New Hampshire University) | Matson, Eric (Purdue University) | Metzler, Ted (Oklahoma City University) | Mihalcea, Rada (University of North Texas) | Mobasher, Bamshad (DePaul University) | Pineau, Joelle (McGill University) | Poupart, Pascal (University of Waterloo) | Raja, Anita (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Ruml, Wheeler (University of New Hampshire) | Sadeh, Norman M. (Carnegie Mellon University) | Shani, Guy (Microsoft Research) | Shapiro, Daniel (Applied Reactivity, Inc.) | Smith, Trey (Carnegie Mellon University West) | Taylor, Matthew E. (University of Southern California) | Wagstaff, Kiri (Jet Propulsion Laboratory) | Walsh, William (CombineNet) | Zhou, Ron (Palo Alto Research Center)
AAAI was pleased to present the AAAI-08 Workshop Program, held Sunday and Monday, July 13–14, in Chicago, Illinois, USA. The program included the following 15 workshops: Advancements in POMDP Solvers; AI Education Workshop Colloquium; Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems, Enhanced Messaging; Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction; Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization and Recommender Systems; Metareasoning: Thinking about Thinking; Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling; Search in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics; Spatial and Temporal Reasoning; Trading Agent Design and Analysis; Transfer Learning for Complex Tasks; What Went Wrong and Why: Lessons from AI Research and Applications; and Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence: An Evolving Synergy.
Agents, Bodies, Constraints, Dynamics, and Evolution
Mackworth, Alan K. (University of British Columbia)
The theme of this article is the dynamics of evolution of agents. That theme is applied to the evolution of constraint satisfaction, of agents themselves, of our models of agents, of artificial intelligence and, finally, of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). The overall thesis is that constraint satisfaction is central to proactive and responsive intelligent behavior.
Impact of Cognitive Radio on Future Management of Spectrum
Cognitive radio is a breakthrough technology which is expected to have a profound impact on the way radio spectrum will be accessed, managed and shared in the future. In this paper I examine some of the implications of cognitive radio for future management of spectrum. Both a near-term view involving the opportunistic spectrum access model and a longer-term view involving a self-regulating dynamic spectrum access model within a society of cognitive radios are discussed.
Preference Handling in Combinatorial Domains: From AI to Social Choice
Chevaleyre, Yann (LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine) | Endriss, Ulle (ILLC, University of Amsterdam) | Lang, Jérôme (LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine) | Maudet, Nicolas (LAMSADE, Université Paris-Dauphine)
In both individual and collective decision making, the space of alternatives from which the agent (or the group of agents) has to choose often has a combinatorial (or multi-attribute) structure. We give an introduction to preference handling in combinatorial domains in the context of collective decision making, and show that the considerable body of work on preference representation and elicitation that AI researchers have been working on for several years is particularly relevant. After giving an overview of languages for compact representation of preferences, we discuss problems in voting in combinatorial domains, and then focus on multiagent resource allocation and fair division. These issues belong to a larger field, known as computational social choice, that brings together ideas from AI and social choice theory, to investigate mechanisms for collective decision making from a computational point of view. We conclude by briefly describing some of the other research topics studied in computational social choice.
COFI RANK - Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization for Collaborative Ranking
Weimer, Markus, Karatzoglou, Alexandros, Le, Quoc V., Smola, Alex J.
In this paper, we consider collaborative filtering as a ranking problem. We present a method which uses Maximum Margin Matrix Factorization and optimizes ranking insteadof rating. We employ structured output prediction to optimize directly for ranking scores. Experimental results show that our method gives very good ranking scores and scales well on collaborative filtering tasks.