Not enough data to create a plot.
Try a different view from the menu above.
Government
Learning the Similarity of Documents: An Information-Geometric Approach to Document Retrieval and Categorization
The project pursued in this paper is to develop from first information-geometric principles a general method for learning the similarity between text documents. Each individual document is modeled as a memoryless information source. Based on a latent class decomposition of the term-document matrix, a lowdimensional (curved) multinomial subfamily is learned. From this model a canonical similarity function - known as the Fisher kernel - is derived. Our approach can be applied for unsupervised and supervised learning problems alike.
Invariant Feature Extraction and Classification in Kernel Spaces
Mika, Sebastian, Rรคtsch, Gunnar, Weston, Jason, Schรถlkopf, Bernhard, Smola, Alex J., Mรผller, Klaus-Robert
In hyperspectral imagery one pixel typically consists of a mixture of the reflectance spectra of several materials, where the mixture coefficients correspond to the abundances of the constituting materials. We assume linear combinations of reflectance spectra with some additive normal sensor noise and derive a probabilistic MAP framework for analyzing hyperspectral data. As the material reflectance characteristics are not know a priori, we face the problem of unsupervised linear unmixing.
What Does the Future Hold?
I was asked to give a visionary talk about the future applications of Artificial Intelligence technology; but I should warn you that I'm actually not very good as a visionary. Most of my predictions about what will happen in the industry don't come true even though they ought to. So I'm not going to tell you what the future holds; what I will do is to point out some of the technological trends that are at work. The outline of the talk is as follows: I'll start off by looking at the previous IAAI conferences and reflect on what we've learned from them. Then I'll look at what's changing in the hardware base that sets the context for all the computer applications we do. I think that will lead to interesting new viewpoints. Next I'll sketch what applications might arise from this new viewpoint. Finally, I'll discuss how the development of practical applications ought to interact with the scientific enterprise of trying to understand intelligence, in particular, human intelligence.
The Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling
Barrett, Anthony, Chien, Steve
The Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (AIPS 2000) was held on 14-17 April 2000 at Breckenridge, Colorado; it was colocated with the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR2000). This conference brought together researchers working in all aspects of problems in planning, scheduling, planning and learning, and plan execution for dealing with complex problems.
The AAAI 1999 Mobile Robot Competitions and Exhibitions
Meeden, Lisa, Schultz, Alan, Balch, Tucker, Bhargava, Rahul, Haigh, Karen Zita, Bohlen, Marc, Stein, Cathryne, Miller, David
The Eighth Annual Mobile Robot Competition and Exhibition was held as part of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Orlando, Florida, 18 to 22 July. The goals of these robot events are to foster the sharing of research and technology, allow research groups to showcase their achievements, encourage students to enter robotics and AI fields at both the undergraduate and graduate level, and increase awareness of the field. The 1999 events included two robot contests; a new, long-term robot challenge; an exhibition; and a National Botball Championship for high school teams sponsored by the KISS Institute. Each of these events is described in detail in this article.
The AIPS-98 Planning Competition
Long, Derek, Kautz, Henry, Selman, Bart, Bonet, Blai, Geffner, Hector, Koehler, Jana, Brenner, Michael, Hoffmann, Joerg, Rittinger, Frank, Anderson, Corin R., Weld, Daniel S., Smith, David E., Fox, Maria, Long, Derek
In 1998, the international planning community was invited to take part in the first planning competition, hosted by the Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems Conference, to provide a new impetus for empirical evaluation and direct comparison of automatic domain-independent planning systems. This article describes the systems that competed in the event, examines the results, and considers some of the implications for the future of the field.
Editorial
First, I would The editorial board members will play an active role in like to welcome B. Chandrasekaran, guiding the magazine, monitoring progress across the field of The Ohio and assuring that the magazine has timely, high-quality State University, as the articles on significant new developments. I expect the editorial new book review editor, board to have a considerable impact on the magazine, and Robert Morris, of and I am very grateful to the board members for NASA Ames Research Center, accepting this responsibility. I know that they will do an Finally, to expedite the processing of submissions, AI outstanding job, and I urge the AI community to actively Magazine will now accept submissions in electronic form. Full submission guidelines are available on the AI Magazine Chandrasekaran has prepared an editorial, appearing in home page, www.aaai.org/Magazine. I look forward to your this issue, presenting his vision for the book review section.
Using Collective Intelligence to Route Internet Traffic
Wolpert, David, Tumer, Kagan, Frank, Jeremy
A COllective INtelligence (COIN) is a set of interacting reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms designed in an automated fashion so that their collective behavior optimizes a global utility function. We summarize the theory of COINs, then present experiments using that theory to design COINs to control internet traffic routing. These experiments indicate that COINs outperform all previously investigated RL-based, shortest path routing algorithms. 1 INTRODUCTION COllective INtelligences (COINs) are large, sparsely connected recurrent neural networks, whose "neurons" are reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. The distinguishing feature of COINs is that their dynamics involves no centralized control, but only the collective effects of the individual neurons each modifying their behavior via their individual RL algorithms. This restriction holds even though the goal of the COIN concerns the system's global behavior.