The past few weeks we've talked a lot about the brand new algorithm that we have designed for Wide Ideas. The story behind Score, which is the name of the new functionality, is a bit interesting. Two years ago I asked myself if it in any way would be possible to use Machine Learning techniques to predict the outcome of football matches. Data mining To describe the process briefly I started by collecting as much data as I could get hold of. I mined data about old games from every different source and API I could find.

It's been a week of extremes for Google's artificial intelligence efforts, as the company luxuriates in the afterglow of winning a board game tournament against one of the world's top players, while it privately tries to sell one of its most visible robotics efforts. Google's decision to try to shed its Boston Dynamics robotics group highlights a fundamental research problem: software is far easier to develop and test than hardware. Today's industrial robots tend to be dumb machines, operating on pre-programmed routines, and are housed in metal cages to stop people walking into their zone of movement and potentially getting harmed. With Boston Dynamics, Google was working on machines that could break out of the rigid confines of the factory and perform a broader range of tasks. That requires dealing with a range of unsolved problems, requiring fundamental research.

A huge milestone has just been reached in the field of artificial intelligence: AlphaGo, a program developed by Google's DeepMind unit, has defeated legendary Go player Lee Se-dol in the first of five historic matches being held in Seoul, South Korea. Lee resigned after about three and a half hours, with 28 minutes and 28 seconds remaining on his clock. The series is the first time a professional 9-dan Go player has taken on a computer, and Lee is competing for a 1 million prize. "I was very surprised," said Lee after the match. "I didn't expect to lose.

Artificial intelligence has never been as pervasive as it is today. From Google's self-driving cars from to Hilton's new Watson-powered hotel concierge, we are witnessing an explosion of AI capabilities. But while it may appear that machines are taking over, they are still tied to their human masters for one very important task: training. "We're in the middle of the'Big Bang' moment of AI," NVIDIA's Senior Product Manager Will Ramey says in the AISummit's new ebook on the topic. "We now have the deep neural networks, the explosion of big data, and now thanks to the leap in processing power with enhanced GPUs, we have the full package to see a real shift in the development of commercial real-world AI applications."

Machine learning is the automation of discovery, and it is responsible for making our smartphones work, helping Netflix suggest movies for us to watch, and getting presidents elected. But there is a push to use machine learning to do even more--to cure cancer and AIDS and possibly solve every problem humanity has. Pedro Domingos is at the very forefront of the search for the Master Algorithm, a universal learner capable of deriving all knowledge--past, present and future--from data. In this book, he lifts the veil on the usually secretive machine learning industry and details the quest for the Master Algorithm, along with the revolutionary implications such a discovery will have on our society. Pedro Domingos is a Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of Washington, and he is the co-founder of the International Machine Learning Society.

Unexpected convergent consequences…this is what happens when eight different exponential technologies all explode onto the scene at once. This post (the second of seven) is a look at artificial intelligence. Future posts will look at other tech areas. An expert might be reasonably good at predicting the growth of a single exponential technology (e.g., the Internet of Things), but try to predict the future when A.I., robotics, VR, synthetic biology and computation are all doubling, morphing and recombining. You have a very exciting (read: unpredictable) future. This year at my Abundance 360 Summit I decided to explore this concept in sessions I called "Convergence Catalyzers." For each technology, I brought in an industry expert to identify their Top 5 Recent Breakthroughs (2012-2015) and their Top 5 Anticipated Breakthroughs (2016-2018). Then, we explored the patterns that emerged.

Inbox by Gmail has a few useful features but probably the most interesting is Smart Reply, which was expanded to the desktop this week. As impressive as the A.I.-powered suggestions for replies to your emails are, they're just not very useful yet. Sure, Smart Replies tend to offer relevant options, but they're not very useful in most real-world cases. Open an invitation to party and you might get'Sounds good!,' 'Can't wait,' and Sorry, I can't be there!' as the suggestions. By the time I've added'Hi Bob,' and a few other bits of personalization, I might as well have written the whole thing myself.

He continued: "We wanted to see if we could build a system that could learn to play and beat the best Go players by just providing the games of professional players. We are thrilled to have achieved this milestone, which has been a lifelong dream of mine. Our hope is that in the future we can apply these techniques to other challenges -- from instant translation to smartphone assistants to advances in health care."

He continued: "We wanted to see if we could build a system that could learn to play and beat the best Go players by just providing the games of professional players. We are thrilled to have achieved this milestone, which has been a lifelong dream of mine. Our hope is that in the future we can apply these techniques to other challenges -- from instant translation to smartphone assistants to advances in health care."

Ever since I read "Singularity is Near" I've been fascinated by Ray Kurzweil – his wirings, ideas, a predictions. He's not been afraid to go on the limb and make some brave and seemingly outlandish forecasts about the upcoming technological advances and their oversize impact on people and society. One of the main reasons why I always found his predictions credible is that they can, in a nutshell, be reduced to just a couple of seemingly simple observations: 1. Information-technological advances are happening exponentially, and 2. Information technology in particular is driving all the other technological and societal changes. The rest, to put it rather crudely, are the details. In "How to Create a Mind" Kurzweil zeroes in on just one scientific/technological project – creating a functioning replica of the human mind.