Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Supervised Word Sense Disambiguation for Venetan: A Proof-of-Concept Experiment
Conforti, Costanza (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) | Fraser, Alexander (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) is a classification task that consists of determining which of the senses of an ambiguous word is activated in a specific context. Research in this field has primarily concentrated on investigating English and a few other well-resourced languages. Recently, studies done on a corpus of Old English (Wunderlich 2015) showed that, even with limited resources, it is still possible to approach the problem of WSD. In this paper, a WSD system has been developed for the Low Resource Language (LRL) Venetan, which has recently received some attention from the Natural Language Processing (NLP) community. Our main contributions are twofold: first, we select and annotate a corpus for Venetan, considering two words (one abstract and one concrete term) and using two levels of annotation (fine- and coarse-grained), reporting on annotator agreement. Second, we report results of proof-of-concept experiments of supervised WSD performed with Support Vector Machines on this corpus. To our knowledge, our work is the first time that WSD for a European Dialect like Venetan has been studied.
Bypassing Combinatorial Protections: Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Single-Peaked Electorates
Brandt, Felix (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) | Brill, Markus (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) | Hemaspaandra, Edith (Rochester Institute of Technology) | Hemaspaandra, Lane A. (University of Rochester)
For many election systems, bribery (and related) attacks have been shown NP-hard using constructions on combinatorially rich structures such as partitions and covers. It is important to learn how robust these hardness protection results are, in order to find whether they can be relied on in practice. This paper shows that for voters who follow the most central political-science model of electorates — single-peaked preferences — those protections vanish. By using single-peaked preferences to simplify combinatorial covering challenges, we show that NP-hard bribery problems — including those for Kemeny and Llull elections- — fall to polynomial time. By using single-peaked preferences to simplify combinatorial partition challenges, we show that NP-hard partition-of-voters problems fall to polynomial time. We furthermore show that for single-peaked electorates, the winner problems for Dodgson and Kemeny elections, though Θ 2 p -complete in the general case, fall to polynomial time. And we completely classify the complexity of weighted coalition manipulation for scoring protocols in single-peaked electorates.