Gettysburg College
Model AI Assignments 2018
Neller, Todd W. (Gettysburg College) | Butler, Zack (Rochester Institute of Technology) | Derbinsky, Nate (Northeastern University) | Furey, Heidi (Manhattan College) | Martin, Fred (University of Massachusetts Lowell) | Guerzhoy, Michael (University of Toronto) | Anders, Ariel (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Eckroth, Joshua (Stetson University)
The Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning ex- perience, we here present abstracts of seven AI assign- ments from the 2018 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instruc- tor needs.
Ask Me Anything about MOOCs
Fisher, Doug (Vanderbilt University.) | Isbell, Charles (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Littman, Michael L. (Brown University) | Wollowski, Michael (Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology) | Neller, Todd W. (Gettysburg College) | Boerkoel, Jim (Harvey Mudd College)
In this article, ten questions about MOOCs (crowdsourced from the recipients of the AAAI and SIGCSE mailing lists) were posed by editors Michael Wollowski, Todd Neller, James Boerkoel to Douglas H. Fisher, Charles Isbell Jr., and Michael Littman โ educators with unique, relevant experiences to lend their perspective on those issues.
Artificial Intelligence Education: Editorial Introduction
Wollowski, Michael (Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology) | Neller, Todd (Gettysburg College) | Boerkoel, James (Harvey Mudd College)
Additional landmark events in the past 20 or so years that looked at the challenges of AI education have included the AI Education Workshop held at the 2008 AAAI conference and the Improving Instruction of Introductory Artificial Intelligence symposium held at the 1994 AAAI Fall Symposium. To quote Marti Hearst, the organizer of the 1994 symposium (Hearst 1994): "This symposium was motivated by the desire to address an oft-voiced complaint that introductory artificial intelligence is a notoriously difficult course to teach well." With the regular progression of the field and recent successes such as autonomous cars, deep learning, and IBM's Watson system, this situation has not become easier. At the same time, recent innovations in pedagogical technologies, such as massive open online courses (MOOCs), smartphones, and smart classrooms, have revolutionized how we view the art of teaching. We believe that now is a good time to take stock of state-of-the-art practices in the teaching of AI, as well as propose a vision for AI education in the future. This issue of AI Magazine includes five articles at the cutting edge of AI education. Each covers a subject of current concern to the AI education community. We note that the subject area expertise of the authors covers a wide range including robotics, knowledge-based systems, ethics, machine learning, and game theory. The article Ask Me Anything About MOOCs by Douglas Fisher, Charles Isbell, and Michael Littman was a unique project.
A Monte Carlo Localization Assignment Using a Neato Vacuum with ROS
Yang, Zuozhi (Gettysburg College) | Neller, Todd W. (Gettysburg College)
Monte Carlo Localization (MCL) is a sampling-based algorithm for mobile robot localization. In this paper we describe an MCL assignment and its required hardware and software. The Neato vacuum robot and a Raspberry Pi serve as the core of the robot model. The Robot Operating System (ROS) is used as the robot programming environment. Students are expected to learn the localization problem, implement the MCL algorithm, and better understand the kidnapped robot problem and the limitations of MCL by observing the performance of the algorithm in real-time application.
Model AI Assignments 2017
Neller, Todd W. (Gettysburg College) | Eckroth, Joshua (Stetson University) | Reddy, Sravana (Wellesley College) | Ziegler, Joshua (Air Force Institute of Technology) | Bindewald, Jason (Air Force Institute of Technology) | Peterson, Gilbert (Air Force Institute of Technology) | Way, Thomas (Villanova University) | Matuszek, Paula (Villanova University) | Cassel, Lillian (Villanova University) | Papalaskari, Mary-Angela (Villanova University) | Weiss, Carol (Villanova University) | Anders, Ariel (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Karaman, Sertac (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
The Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of six AI assignments from the 2017 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs.
A Survey of Current Practice and Teaching of AI
Wollowski, Michael (Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology) | Selkowitz, Robert (Canisius College) | Brown, Laura E. (Michigan Technological Institute) | Goel, Ashok (Georgia Institute of Technology) | Luger, George (University of New Mexico) | Marshall, Jim (Sarah Lawrence College) | Neel, Andrew (Discover Cards) | Neller, Todd (Gettysburg College) | Norvig, Peter (Google)
The field of AI has changed significantly in the past couple of years and will likely continue to do so. Driven by a desire to expose our students to relevant and modern materials, we conducted two surveys, one of AI instructors and one of AI practitioners. The surveys were aimed at gathering infor-mation about the current state of the art of introducing AI as well as gathering input from practitioners in the field on techniques used in practice. In this paper, we present and briefly discuss the responses to those two surveys.
Learning and Using Hand Abstraction Values for Parameterized Poker Squares
Neller, Todd W. (Gettysburg College) | Messinger, Colin M. (Gettysburg College) | Yang, Zuozhi (Gettysburg College)
We describe the experimental development of an AI player that adapts to different point systems for Parameterized Poker Squares. After introducing the game and research competition challenge, we describe our static board evaluation utilizing learned evaluations of abstract partial Poker hands. Next, we evaluate various time management strategies and search algorithms. Finally, we show experimentally which of our design decisions most signicantly accounted for observed performance.
Model AI Assignments 2016
Neller, Todd W. (Gettysburg College) | Brown, Laura E. (Michigan Technological University) | Marshall, James B. (Sarah Lawrence College) | Torrey, Lisa (St. Lawrence University) | Derbinsky, Nate (Wentworth Institute of Technology) | Ward, Andrew A. (Software Developer) | Allen, Thomas E. (University of Kentucky) | Goldsmith, Judy (University of Kentucky) | Muluneh, Nahom (University of Kentucky)
The Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of six AI assignments from the 2016 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs.
Model AI Assignments 2012
Neller, Todd William (Gettysburg College) | Brown, Laura E. (Michigan Technological University) | Earnest, John (Michigan Technological University) | Hiebel, Jason (Michigan Technological University) | Turnbull, Douglas (Ithaca College)
The Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of three AI assignments from the 2012 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs.