K-medoids clustering is a popular variant of k-means clustering and widely used in pattern recognition and machine learning. A main drawback of k-medoids clustering is that an improper initialization can cause it to get trapped in local optima. An improved k-medoids clustering algorithm, called INCKM algorithm, which is the first to apply incremental initialization to k-medoids clustering, was recently proposed to overcome this drawback. The INCKM algorithm requires the construction of a subset of candidate medoids determined by one hyperparameter for initialization, and meanwhile, it always fails when dealing with imbalanced datasets with an incorrect hyperparameter selection. In this paper, we propose a novel k-medoids clustering algorithm, called incremental k-means++ (INCKPP) algorithm, which initializes with a novel incremental manner, attempting to optimally add one new cluster center at each stage through a nonparametric and stochastic k-means++ initialization. The INCKPP algorithm overcomes the difficulty of hyperparameter selection in the INCKM algorithm, improves the clustering performance, and can deal with imbalanced datasets well. However, the INCKPP algorithm is not computationally efficient enough. To deal with this, we further propose an improved INCKPP algorithm, called INCKPPsample algorithm, which improves the clustering efficiency while maintaining the clustering performance of the INCKPP algorithm. Extensive results from experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, including imbalanced datasets, illustrate that the proposed algorithms outperforms than the other compared algorithms.

Monitoring propeller failures is vital to maintain the safe and reliable operation of quadrotor UAVs. The simulation-to-reality UAV fault diagnosis technique offer a secure and economical approach to identify faults in propellers. However, classifiers trained with simulated data perform poorly in real flights due to the wind disturbance in outdoor scenarios. In this work, we propose an uncertainty-based fault classifier (UFC) to address the challenge of sim-to-real UAV fault diagnosis in windy scenarios. It uses the ensemble of difference-based deep convolutional neural networks (EDDCNN) to reduce model variance and bias. Moreover, it employs an uncertainty-based decision framework to filter out uncertain predictions. Experimental results demonstrate that the UFC can achieve 100% fault-diagnosis accuracy with a data usage rate of 33.6% in the windy outdoor scenario.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has exhibited considerable promise in the training of control agents for mapless robot navigation. However, DRL-trained agents are limited to the specific robot dimensions used during training, hindering their applicability when the robot's dimension changes for task-specific requirements. To overcome this limitation, we propose a dimension-variable robot navigation method based on DRL. Our approach involves training a meta agent in simulation and subsequently transferring the meta skill to a dimension-varied robot using a technique called dimension-variable skill transfer (DVST). During the training phase, the meta agent for the meta robot learns self-navigation skills with DRL. In the skill-transfer phase, observations from the dimension-varied robot are scaled and transferred to the meta agent, and the resulting control policy is scaled back to the dimension-varied robot. Through extensive simulated and real-world experiments, we demonstrated that the dimension-varied robots could successfully navigate in unknown and dynamic environments without any retraining. The results show that our work substantially expands the applicability of DRL-based navigation methods, enabling them to be used on robots with different dimensions without the limitation of a fixed dimension. The video of our experiments can be found in the supplementary file.

Identifying the fault in propellers is important to keep quadrotors operating safely and efficiently. The simulation-to-reality (sim-to-real) UAV fault diagnosis methods provide a cost-effective and safe approach to detect the propeller faults. However, due to the gap between simulation and reality, classifiers trained with simulated data usually underperform in real flights. In this work, a new deep neural network (DNN) model is presented to address the above issue. It uses the difference features extracted by deep convolutional neural networks (DDCNN) to reduce the sim-to-real gap. Moreover, a new domain adaptation method is presented to further bring the distribution of the real-flight data closer to that of the simulation data. The experimental results show that the proposed approach can achieve an accuracy of 97.9\% in detecting propeller faults in real flight. Feature visualization was performed to help better understand our DDCNN model.

Accurate diagnosis of propeller faults is crucial for ensuring the safe and efficient operation of quadrotors. Training a fault classifier using simulated data and deploying it on a real quadrotor is a cost-effective and safe approach. However, the simulation-to-reality gap often leads to poor performance of the classifier when applied in real flight. In this work, we propose a deep learning model that addresses this issue by utilizing newly identified features (NIF) as input and utilizing domain adaptation techniques to reduce the simulation-to-reality gap. In addition, we introduce an adjusted simulation model that generates training data that more accurately reflects the behavior of real quadrotors. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach achieves an accuracy of 96\% in detecting propeller faults. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reliable and efficient method for simulation-to-reality fault diagnosis of quadrotor propellers.

We also introduced a taxonomy to The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in navigate the space of explanation methods, not only the ten high stakes domains has been coupled with an increase in societal in the toolkit but also the broader literature on explainable demands for these systems to provide explanations for AI. The taxonomy was intended to be usable by consumers their outputs. This societal demand has already resulted in with varied backgrounds to choose an appropriate explanation new regulations requiring explanations (Goodman and Flaxman method for their application. AIX360 differs from other 2016; Wachter, Mittelstadt, and Floridi 2017; Selbst open source explainability toolkits (see Arya et al. (2020) and Powles 2017; Pasternak 2019). Explanations can allow for a list) in two main ways: 1) its support for a broad and users to gain insight into the system's decision-making process, diverse spectrum of explainability methods, implemented in which is a key component in calibrating appropriate a common architecture, and 2) its educational material as trust and confidence in AI systems (Doshi-Velez and Kim discussed below.

In this paper, we describe an open source Python toolkit named Uncertainty Quantification 360 (UQ360) for the uncertainty quantification of AI models. The goal of this toolkit is twofold: first, to provide a broad range of capabilities to streamline as well as foster the common practices of quantifying, evaluating, improving, and communicating uncertainty in the AI application development lifecycle; second, to encourage further exploration of UQ's connections to other pillars of trustworthy AI such as fairness and transparency through the dissemination of latest research and education materials. Beyond the Python package (\url{https://github.com/IBM/UQ360}), we have developed an interactive experience (\url{http://uq360.mybluemix.net}) and guidance materials as educational tools to aid researchers and developers in producing and communicating high-quality uncertainties in an effective manner.

Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) is a rapidly growing set of technologies that automate the model development pipeline by searching model space and generating candidate models. A critical, final step of AutoML is human selection of a final model from dozens of candidates. In current AutoML systems, selection is supported only by performance metrics. Prior work has shown that in practice, people evaluate ML models based on additional criteria, such as the way a model makes predictions. Comparison may happen at multiple levels, from types of errors, to feature importance, to how the model makes predictions of specific instances. We developed \tool{} to support interactive model comparison for AutoML by integrating multiple Explainable AI (XAI) and visualization techniques. We conducted a user study in which we both evaluated the system and used it as a technology probe to understand how users perform model comparison in an AutoML system. We discuss design implications for utilizing XAI techniques for model comparison and supporting the unique needs of data scientists in comparing AutoML models.

Training an agent to navigate with DRL is data-hungry, which requires millions of training steps. Besides, the DRL agents performing well in training scenarios are found to perform poorly in some unseen real-world scenarios. In this paper, we discuss why the DRL agent fails in such unseen scenarios and find the representation of LiDAR readings is the key factor behind the agent's performance degradation. Moreover, we propose an easy, but efficient input pre-processing (IP) approach to accelerate training and enhance the performance of the DRL agent in such scenarios. The proposed IP functions can highlight the important short-distance values of laser scans and compress the range of less-important long-distance values. Extensive comparative experiments are carried out, and the experimental results demonstrate the high performance of the proposed IP approaches.

Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) demonstrates great potential in mapless navigation domain. However, such a navigation model is normally restricted to a fixed configuration of the range sensor because its input format is fixed. In this paper, we propose a DRL model that can address range data obtained from different range sensors with different installation positions. Our model first extracts the goal-directed features from each obstacle point. Subsequently, it chooses global obstacle features from all point-feature candidates and uses these features for the final decision. As only a few points are used to support the final decision, we refer to these points as support points and our approach as support-point based navigation (SPN). Our model can handle data from different LiDAR setups and demonstrates good performance in simulation and real-world experiments. It can also be used to guide the installation of range sensors to enhance robot navigation performance.