Zelinsky, Gregory
Predicting Human Attention using Computational Attention
Yang, Zhibo, Mondal, Sounak, Ahn, Seoyoung, Zelinsky, Gregory, Hoai, Minh, Samaras, Dimitris
Most models of visual attention are aimed at predicting either top-down or bottom-up control, as studied using different visual search and free-viewing tasks. We propose Human Attention Transformer (HAT), a single model predicting both forms of attention control. HAT is the new state-of-the-art (SOTA) in predicting the scanpath of fixations made during target-present and target-absent search, and matches or exceeds SOTA in the prediction of taskless free-viewing fixation scanpaths. HAT achieves this new SOTA by using a novel transformer-based architecture and a simplified foveated retina that collectively create a spatio-temporal awareness akin to the dynamic visual working memory of humans. Unlike previous methods that rely on a coarse grid of fixation cells and experience information loss due to fixation discretization, HAT features a dense-prediction architecture and outputs a dense heatmap for each fixation, thus avoiding discretizing fixations. HAT sets a new standard in computational attention, which emphasizes both effectiveness and generality. HAT's demonstrated scope and applicability will likely inspire the development of new attention models that can better predict human behavior in various attention-demanding scenarios.
The Role of Top-down and Bottom-up Processes in Guiding Eye Movements during Visual Search
Zelinsky, Gregory, Zhang, Wei, Yu, Bing, Chen, Xin, Samaras, Dimitris
To investigate how top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) information is weighted in the guidance of human search behavior, we manipulated the proportions of BU and TD components in a saliency-based model. The model is biologically plausible and implements an artificial retina and a neuronal population code. The BU component is based on featurecontrast. TheTD component is defined by a feature-template match to a stored target representation. We compared the model's behavior at different mixturesof TD and BU components to the eye movement behavior of human observers performing the identical search task. We found that a purely TD model provides a much closer match to human behavior than any mixture model using BU information. Only when biological constraints areremoved (e.g., eliminating the retina) did a BU/TD mixture model begin to approximate human behavior.