This paper reports about an application of Bayes' inferred neural network classifiers in the field of automatic sleep staging. The reason for using Bayesian learning for this task is twofold. First, Bayesian inference is known to embody regularization automatically. Second, a side effect of Bayesian learning leads to larger variance of network outputs in regions without training data. This results in well known moderation effects, which can be used to detect outliers. In a 5 fold cross-validation experiment the full Bayesian solution found with R. Neals hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm, was not better than a single maximum a-posteriori (MAP) solution found with D.J. MacKay's evidence approximation. In a second experiment we studied the properties of both solutions in rejecting classification of movement artefacts.

Sleep staging is usually based on rules defined by Rechtschaffen and Kales (see [8]). Rechtschaffen and Kales rules define 4 sleep stages, stage one to four, as well as rapid eye movement (REM) and wakefulness. In [1] J. Bentrup and S. Ray report that every year nearly one million US citizens consulted their physicians concerning their sleep. Since sleep staging is a tedious task (one all night recording on average takes abou t 3 hours to score manually), much effort was spent in designing automatic sleep stagers. Sleep staging is a classification problem which was solved using classical statistical t.echniques or techniques emerged from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) .

This paper reports about an application of Bayes' inferred neural network classifiers in the field of automatic sleep staging. The reason for using Bayesian learning for this task is twofold. First, Bayesian inference is known to embody regularization automatically. Second, a side effect of Bayesian learning leads to larger variance of network outputs in regions without training data. This results in well known moderation effects, which can be used to detect outliers. In a 5 fold cross-validation experiment the full Bayesian solution found with R. Neals hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm, was not better than a single maximum a-posteriori (MAP) solution found with D.J. MacKay's evidence approximation. In a second experiment we studied the properties of both solutions in rejecting classification of movement artefacts.