Logs are imperative in the maintenance of online service systems, which often encompass important information for effective failure mitigation. While existing anomaly detection methodologies facilitate the identification of anomalous logs within extensive runtime data, manual investigation of log messages by engineers remains essential to comprehend faults, which is labor-intensive and error-prone. Upon examining the log-based troubleshooting practices at CloudA, we find that engineers typically prioritize two categories of log information for diagnosis. These include fault-indicating descriptions, which record abnormal system events, and fault-indicating parameters, which specify the associated entities. Motivated by this finding, we propose an approach to automatically extract such faultindicating information from logs for fault diagnosis, named LoFI. LoFI comprises two key stages. In the first stage, LoFI performs coarse-grained filtering to collect logs related to the faults based on semantic similarity. In the second stage, LoFI leverages a pre-trained language model with a novel prompt-based tuning method to extract fine-grained information of interest from the collected logs. We evaluate LoFI on logs collected from Apache Spark and an industrial dataset from CloudA. The experimental results demonstrate that LoFI outperforms all baseline methods by a significant margin, achieving an absolute improvement of 25.8~37.9 in F1 over the best baseline method, ChatGPT. This highlights the effectiveness of LoFI in recognizing fault-indicating information. Furthermore, the successful deployment of LoFI at CloudA and user studies validate the utility of our method. The code and data are available at https://github.com/Jun-jie-Huang/LoFI.

Due to the scale and complexity of cloud systems, a system failure would trigger an "alert storm", i.e., massive correlated alerts. Although these alerts can be traced back to a few root causes, the overwhelming number makes it infeasible for manual handling. Alert aggregation is thus critical to help engineers concentrate on the root cause and facilitate failure resolution. Existing methods typically utilize semantic similarity-based methods or statistical methods to aggregate alerts. However, semantic similarity-based methods overlook the causal rationale of alerts, while statistical methods can hardly handle infrequent alerts. To tackle these limitations, we introduce leveraging external knowledge, i.e., Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) of alerts as a supplement. We propose COLA, a novel hybrid approach based on correlation mining and LLM (Large Language Model) reasoning for online alert aggregation. The correlation mining module effectively captures the temporal and spatial relations between alerts, measuring their correlations in an efficient manner. Subsequently, only uncertain pairs with low confidence are forwarded to the LLM reasoning module for detailed analysis. This hybrid design harnesses both statistical evidence for frequent alerts and the reasoning capabilities of computationally intensive LLMs, ensuring the overall efficiency of COLA in handling large volumes of alerts in practical scenarios. We evaluate COLA on three datasets collected from the production environment of a large-scale cloud platform. The experimental results show COLA achieves F1-scores from 0.901 to 0.930, outperforming state-of-the-art methods and achieving comparable efficiency. We also share our experience in deploying COLA in our real-world cloud system, Cloud X.

Postmortem analysis is essential in the management of incidents within cloud systems, which provides valuable insights to improve system's reliability and robustness. At CloudA, fault pattern profiling is performed during the postmortem phase, which involves the classification of incidents' faults into unique categories, referred to as fault pattern. By aggregating and analyzing these fault patterns, engineers can discern common faults, vulnerable components and emerging fault trends. However, this process is currently conducted by manual labeling, which has inherent drawbacks. On the one hand, the sheer volume of incidents means only the most severe ones are analyzed, causing a skewed overview of fault patterns. On the other hand, the complexity of the task demands extensive domain knowledge, which leads to errors and inconsistencies. To address these limitations, we propose an automated approach, named FaultProfIT, for Fault pattern Profiling of Incident Tickets. It leverages hierarchy-guided contrastive learning to train a hierarchy-aware incident encoder and predicts fault patterns with enhanced incident representations. We evaluate FaultProfIT using the production incidents from CloudA. The results demonstrate that FaultProfIT outperforms state-of-the-art methods. Our ablation study and analysis also verify the effectiveness of hierarchy-guided contrastive learning. Additionally, we have deployed FaultProfIT at CloudA for six months. To date, FaultProfIT has analyzed 10,000+ incidents from 30+ cloud services, successfully revealing several fault trends that have informed system improvements.

As modern software systems continue to grow in terms of complexity and volume, anomaly detection on multivariate monitoring metrics, which profile systems' health status, becomes more and more critical and challenging. In particular, the dependency between different metrics and their historical patterns plays a critical role in pursuing prompt and accurate anomaly detection. Existing approaches fall short of industrial needs for being unable to capture such information efficiently. To fill this significant gap, in this paper, we propose CMAnomaly, an anomaly detection framework on multivariate monitoring metrics based on collaborative machine. The proposed collaborative machine is a mechanism to capture the pairwise interactions along with feature and temporal dimensions with linear time complexity. Cost-effective models can then be employed to leverage both the dependency between monitoring metrics and their historical patterns for anomaly detection. The proposed framework is extensively evaluated with both public data and industrial data collected from a large-scale online service system of Huawei Cloud. The experimental results demonstrate that compared with state-of-the-art baseline models, CMAnomaly achieves an average F1 score of 0.9494, outperforming baselines by 6.77% to 10.68%, and runs 10X to 20X faster. Furthermore, we also share our experience of deploying CMAnomaly in Huawei Cloud.

Performance issues permeate large-scale cloud service systems, which can lead to huge revenue losses. To ensure reliable performance, it's essential to accurately identify and localize these issues using service monitoring metrics. Given the complexity and scale of modern cloud systems, this task can be challenging and may require extensive expertise and resources beyond the capacity of individual humans. Some existing methods tackle this problem by analyzing each metric independently to detect anomalies. However, this could incur overwhelming alert storms that are difficult for engineers to diagnose manually. To pursue better performance, not only the temporal patterns of metrics but also the correlation between metrics (i.e., relational patterns) should be considered, which can be formulated as a multivariate metrics anomaly detection problem. However, most of the studies fall short of extracting these two types of features explicitly. Moreover, there exist some unlabeled anomalies mixed in the training data, which may hinder the detection performance. To address these limitations, we propose the Relational- Temporal Anomaly Detection Model (RTAnomaly) that combines the relational and temporal information of metrics. RTAnomaly employs a graph attention layer to learn the dependencies among metrics, which will further help pinpoint the anomalous metrics that may cause the anomaly effectively. In addition, we exploit the concept of positive unlabeled learning to address the issue of potential anomalies in the training data. To evaluate our method, we conduct experiments on a public dataset and two industrial datasets. RTAnomaly outperforms all the baseline models by achieving an average F1 score of 0.929 and Hit@3 of 0.920, demonstrating its superiority.