Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has revolutionized quantitative finance by achieving excellent performance without significant manual effort. Whereas we observe that the DRL models behave unstably in a dynamic stock market due to the low signal-to-noise ratio nature of the financial data. In this paper, we propose a novel logic-guided trading framework, termed as SYENS (Program Synthesis-based Ensemble Strategy). Different from the previous state-of-the-art ensemble reinforcement learning strategy which arbitrarily selects the best-performing agent for testing based on a single measurement, our framework proposes regularizing the model's behavior in a hierarchical manner using the program synthesis by sketching paradigm. First, we propose a high-level, domain-specific language (DSL) that is used for the depiction of the market environment and action. Then based on the DSL, a novel program sketch is introduced, which embeds human expert knowledge in a logical manner. Finally, based on the program sketch, we adopt the program synthesis by sketching a paradigm and synthesizing a logical, hierarchical trading strategy. We evaluate SYENS on the 30 Dow Jones stocks under the cash trading and the margin trading settings. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework can significantly outperform the baselines with much higher cumulative return and lower maximum drawdown under both settings.

Neural code models have introduced significant improvements over many software analysis tasks like type inference, vulnerability detection, etc. Despite the good performance of such models under the common intra-project independent and identically distributed (IID) training and validation setting, we observe that they usually fail to generalize to real-world inter-project out-of-distribution (OOD) setting. In this work, we show that such phenomenon is caused by model heavily relying on project-specific, ungeneralizable tokens like self-defined variable and function names for downstream prediction, and we formulate it as the project-specific bias learning behavior. We propose a measurement to interpret such behavior, termed as Cond-Idf, which combines co-occurrence probability and inverse document frequency to measure the level of relatedness of token with label and its project-specificness. The approximation indicates that without proper regularization with prior knowledge, model tends to leverage spurious statistical cues for prediction. Equipped with these observations, we propose a bias mitigation mechanism Batch Partition Regularization (BPR) that regularizes model to infer based on proper behavior by leveraging latent logic relations among samples. Experimental results on two deep code benchmarks indicate that BPR can improve both inter-project OOD generalization and adversarial robustness while not sacrificing accuracy on IID data.