Wei, Tianyi
MentalChat16K: A Benchmark Dataset for Conversational Mental Health Assistance
Xu, Jia, Wei, Tianyi, Hou, Bojian, Orzechowski, Patryk, Yang, Shu, Jin, Ruochen, Paulbeck, Rachael, Wagenaar, Joost, Demiris, George, Shen, Li
We introduce MentalChat16K, an English benchmark dataset combining a synthetic mental health counseling dataset and a dataset of anonymized transcripts from interventions between Behavioral Health Coaches and Caregivers of patients in palliative or hospice care. Covering a diverse range of conditions like depression, anxiety, and grief, this curated dataset is designed to facilitate the development and evaluation of large language models for conversational mental health assistance. By providing a high-quality resource tailored to this critical domain, MentalChat16K aims to advance research on empathetic, personalized AI solutions to improve access to mental health support services. The dataset prioritizes patient privacy, ethical considerations, and responsible data usage. MentalChat16K presents a valuable opportunity for the research community to innovate AI technologies that can positively impact mental well-being.
Clustering Alzheimer's Disease Subtypes via Similarity Learning and Graph Diffusion
Wei, Tianyi, Yang, Shu, Tarzanagh, Davoud Ataee, Bao, Jingxuan, Xu, Jia, Orzechowski, Patryk, Wagenaar, Joost B., Long, Qi, Shen, Li
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that affects millions of people worldwide. Due to the heterogeneous nature of AD, its diagnosis and treatment pose critical challenges. Consequently, there is a growing research interest in identifying homogeneous AD subtypes that can assist in addressing these challenges in recent years. In this study, we aim to identify subtypes of AD that represent distinctive clinical features and underlying pathology by utilizing unsupervised clustering with graph diffusion and similarity learning. We adopted SIMLR, a multi-kernel similarity learning framework, and graph diffusion to perform clustering on a group of 829 patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI, a prodromal stage of AD) based on their cortical thickness measurements extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Although the clustering approach we utilized has not been explored for the task of AD subtyping before, it demonstrated significantly better performance than several commonly used clustering methods. Specifically, we showed the power of graph diffusion in reducing the effects of noise in the subtype detection. Our results revealed five subtypes that differed remarkably in their biomarkers, cognitive status, and some other clinical features. To evaluate the resultant subtypes further, a genetic association study was carried out and successfully identified potential genetic underpinnings of different AD subtypes. Our source code is available at: https://github.com/PennShenLab/AD-SIMLR.
Establishing Rigorous and Cost-effective Clinical Trials for Artificial Intelligence Models
Gao, Wanling, Huang, Yunyou, Cui, Dandan, Yu, Zhuoming, Liu, Wenjing, Liang, Xiaoshuang, Zhao, Jiahui, Xie, Jiyue, Li, Hao, Ma, Li, Ye, Ning, Kang, Yumiao, Luo, Dingfeng, Pan, Peng, Huang, Wei, Liu, Zhongmou, Hu, Jizhong, Zhao, Gangyuan, Jiang, Chongrong, Huang, Fan, Wei, Tianyi, Tang, Suqin, Xia, Bingjie, Zhang, Zhifei, Zhan, Jianfeng
A profound gap persists between artificial intelligence (AI) and clinical practice in medicine, primarily due to the lack of rigorous and cost-effective evaluation methodologies. State-of-the-art and state-of-the-practice AI model evaluations are limited to laboratory studies on medical datasets or direct clinical trials with no or solely patient-centered controls. Moreover, the crucial role of clinicians in collaborating with AI, pivotal for determining its impact on clinical practice, is often overlooked. For the first time, we emphasize the critical necessity for rigorous and cost-effective evaluation methodologies for AI models in clinical practice, featuring patient/clinician-centered (dual-centered) AI randomized controlled trials (DC-AI RCTs) and virtual clinician-based in-silico trials (VC-MedAI) as an effective proxy for DC-AI RCTs. Leveraging 7500 diagnosis records from two-phase inaugural DC-AI RCTs across 14 medical centers with 125 clinicians, our results demonstrate the necessity of DC-AI RCTs and the effectiveness of VC-MedAI. Notably, VC-MedAI performs comparably to human clinicians, replicating insights and conclusions from prospective DC-AI RCTs. We envision DC-AI RCTs and VC-MedAI as pivotal advancements, presenting innovative and transformative evaluation methodologies for AI models in clinical practice, offering a preclinical-like setting mirroring conventional medicine, and reshaping development paradigms in a cost-effective and fast-iterative manner. Chinese Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400086816.