Reward design is a critical part of the application of reinforcement learning, the performance of which strongly depends on how well the reward signal frames the goal of the designer and how well the signal assesses progress in reaching that goal. In many cases, the extrinsic rewards provided by the environment (e.g., win or loss of a game) are very sparse and make it difficult to train agents directly. Researchers usually assist the learning of agents by adding some auxiliary rewards in practice. However, designing auxiliary rewards is often turned to a trial-and-error search for reward settings that produces acceptable results. In this paper, we propose to automatically generate goal-consistent intrinsic rewards for the agent to learn, by maximizing which the expected accumulative extrinsic rewards can be maximized. To this end, we introduce the concept of motivation which captures the underlying goal of maximizing certain rewards and propose the motivation based reward design method. The basic idea is to shape the intrinsic rewards by minimizing the distance between the intrinsic and extrinsic motivations. We conduct extensive experiments and show that our method performs better than the state-of-the-art methods in handling problems of delayed reward, exploration, and credit assignment.

Recent research has proved that deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, the legitimate input added with imperceptible and well-designed perturbations can fool DNNs easily in the testing stage. However, most of the existing adversarial attacks are difficult to fool adversarially trained models. To solve this issue, we propose an AdaBelief iterative Fast Gradient Sign Method (AB-FGSM) to generalize adversarial examples. By integrating AdaBelief optimization algorithm to I-FGSM, we believe that the generalization of adversarial examples will be improved, relying on the strong generalization of AdaBelief optimizer. To validate the effectiveness and transferability of adversarial examples generated by our proposed AB-FGSM, we conduct the white-box and black-box attacks on various single models and ensemble models. Compared with state-of-the-art attack methods, our proposed method can generate adversarial examples effectively in the white-box setting, and the transfer rate is 7%-21% higher than latest attack methods.

Reward shaping is an effective technique for incorporating domain knowledge into reinforcement learning (RL). Existing approaches such as potential-based reward shaping normally make full use of a given shaping reward function. However, since the transformation of human knowledge into numeric reward values is often imperfect due to reasons such as human cognitive bias, completely utilizing the shaping reward function may fail to improve the performance of RL algorithms. In this paper, we consider the problem of adaptively utilizing a given shaping reward function. We formulate the utilization of shaping rewards as a bi-level optimization problem, where the lower level is to optimize policy using the shaping rewards and the upper level is to optimize a parameterized shaping weight function for true reward maximization. We formally derive the gradient of the expected true reward with respect to the shaping weight function parameters and accordingly propose three learning algorithms based on different assumptions. Experiments in sparse-reward cartpole and MuJoCo environments show that our algorithms can fully exploit beneficial shaping rewards, and meanwhile ignore unbeneficial shaping rewards or even transform them into beneficial ones.