In practice, and more especially when training deep neural networks, visual recognition rules are often learned based on various sources of information. On the other hand, the recent deployment of facial recognition systems with uneven predictive performances on different population segments highlights the representativeness issues possibly induced by a naive aggregation of image datasets. Indeed, sampling bias does not vanish simply by considering larger datasets, and ignoring its impact may completely jeopardize the generalization capacity of the learned prediction rules. In this paper, we show how biasing models, originally introduced for nonparametric estimation in (Gill et al., 1988), and recently revisited from the perspective of statistical learning theory in (Laforgue and Cl\'emen\c{c}on, 2019), can be applied to remedy these problems in the context of visual recognition. Based on the (approximate) knowledge of the biasing mechanisms at work, our approach consists in reweighting the observations, so as to form a nearly debiased estimator of the target distribution. One key condition for our method to be theoretically valid is that the supports of the distributions generating the biased datasets at disposal must overlap, and cover the support of the target distribution. In order to meet this requirement in practice, we propose to use a low dimensional image representation, shared across the image databases. Finally, we provide numerical experiments highlighting the relevance of our approach whenever the biasing functions are appropriately chosen.

The development of cluster computing frameworks has allowed practitioners to scale out various statistical estimation and machine learning algorithms with minimal programming effort. This is especially true for machine learning problems whose objective function is nicely separable across individual data points, such as classification and regression. In contrast, statistical learning tasks involving pairs (or more generally tuples) of data points - such as metric learning, clustering or ranking do not lend themselves as easily to data-parallelism and in-memory computing. In this paper, we investigate how to balance between statistical performance and computational efficiency in such distributed tuplewise statistical problems. We first propose a simple strategy based on occasionally repartitioning data across workers between parallel computation stages, where the number of repartitioning steps rules the trade-off between accuracy and runtime. We then present some theoretical results highlighting the benefits brought by the proposed method in terms of variance reduction, and extend our results to design distributed stochastic gradient descent algorithms for tuplewise empirical risk minimization. Our results are supported by numerical experiments in pairwise statistical estimation and learning on synthetic and real-world datasets.

In many situations, the choice of an adequate similarity measure or metric on the feature space dramatically determines the performance of machine learning methods. Building automatically such measures is the specific purpose of metric/similarity learning. In Vogel et al. (2018), similarity learning is formulated as a pairwise bipartite ranking problem: ideally, the larger the probability that two observations in the feature space belong to the same class (or share the same label), the higher the similarity measure between them. From this perspective, the ROC curve is an appropriate performance criterion and it is the goal of this article to extend recursive tree-based ROC optimization techniques in order to propose efficient similarity learning algorithms. The validity of such iterative partitioning procedures in the pairwise setting is established by means of results pertaining to the theory of U-processes and from a practical angle, it is discussed at length how to implement them by means of splitting rules specifically tailored to the similarity learning task. Beyond these theoretical/methodological contributions, numerical experiments are displayed and provide strong empirical evidence of the performance of the algorithmic approaches we propose.

The performance of many machine learning techniques depends on the choice of an appropriate similarity or distance measure on the input space. Similarity learning (or metric learning) aims at building such a measure from training data so that observations with the same (resp. different) label are as close (resp. far) as possible. In this paper, similarity learning is investigated from the perspective of pairwise bipartite ranking, where the goal is to rank the elements of a database by decreasing order of the probability that they share the same label with some query data point, based on the similarity scores. A natural performance criterion in this setting is pointwise ROC optimization: maximize the true positive rate under a fixed false positive rate. We study this novel perspective on similarity learning through a rigorous probabilistic framework. The empirical version of the problem gives rise to a constrained optimization formulation involving U-statistics, for which we derive universal learning rates as well as faster rates under a noise assumption on the data distribution. We also address the large-scale setting by analyzing the effect of sampling-based approximations. Our theoretical results are supported by illustrative numerical experiments.