We present a neural network approach for closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS). We cast the problem of finding an optimal neurostimulation strategy as a control problem. In this setting, control policies aim to optimize therapeutic outcomes by tailoring the parameters of a DBS system, typically via electrical stimulation, in real time based on the patient's ongoing neuronal activity. We approximate the value function offline using a neural network to enable generating controls (stimuli) in real time via the feedback form. The neuronal activity is characterized by a nonlinear, stiff system of differential equations as dictated by the Hodgkin-Huxley model. Our training process leverages the relationship between Pontryagin's maximum principle and Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations to update the value function estimates simultaneously. Our numerical experiments illustrate the accuracy of our approach for out-of-distribution samples and the robustness to moderate shocks and disturbances in the system.

Both approaches enable sampling and density estimation of conditional probability distributions, which are core tasks in Bayesian inference. Our methods represent the target conditional distributions as transformations of a tractable reference distribution and, therefore, fall into the framework of measure transport. COT maps are a canonical choice within this framework, with desirable properties such as uniqueness and monotonicity. However, the associated COT problems are computationally challenging, even in moderate dimensions. To improve the scalability, our numerical algorithms leverage neural networks to parameterize COT maps. Our methods exploit the structure of the static and dynamic formulations of the COT problem. PCP-Map models conditional transport maps as the gradient of a partially input convex neural network (PICNN) and uses a novel numerical implementation to increase computational efficiency compared to state-of-the-art alternatives. COT-Flow models conditional transports via the flow of a regularized neural ODE; it is slower to train but offers faster sampling. We demonstrate their effectiveness and efficiency by comparing them with state-of-the-art approaches using benchmark datasets and Bayesian inverse problems.