Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has led to many recent breakthroughs on complex control tasks, such as defeating the best human player in the game of Go. However, decisions made by the DRL agent are not explainable, hindering its applicability in safety-critical settings. Viper, a recently proposed technique, constructs a decision tree policy by mimicking the DRL agent. Decision trees are interpretable as each action made can be traced back to the decision rule path that lead to it. However, one global decision tree approximating the DRL policy has significant limitations with respect to the geometry of decision boundaries. We propose Mo\"ET, a more expressive, yet still interpretable model based on Mixture of Experts, consisting of a gating function that partitions the state space, and multiple decision tree experts that specialize on different partitions. We propose a training procedure to support non-differentiable decision tree experts and integrate it into imitation learning procedure of Viper. We evaluate our algorithm on four OpenAI gym environments, and show that the policy constructed in such a way is more performant and better mimics the DRL agent by lowering mispredictions and increasing the reward. We also show that Mo\"ET policies are amenable for verification using off-the-shelf automated theorem provers such as Z3.

Due to its potential to improve programmer productivity and software quality, automated program repair has been an active topic of research. Newer techniques harness neural networks to learn directly from examples of buggy programs and their fixes. In this work, we consider a recently identified class of bugs called variable-misuse bugs. We show that it is beneficial to train a model that jointly and directly localizes and repairs variable-misuse bugs. The experimental results show that the joint model significantly outperforms an enumerative solution that uses a pointer based model for repair alone. Advances in machine learning and the availability of large corpora of source code have led to growing interest in the development of neural representations of programs for performing program analyses. In recent work, Allamanis et al. (2018) proposed the problem of variable misuse (VARMISUSE): given a program, find program locations where variables are used, and predict the correct variables that should be in those locations. A VARMISUSEbug exists when the correct variable differs from the current one at a location. Allamanis et al. (2018) show that variable misuses occur in practice, e.g., when a programmer copies some code into a new context, but forgets to rename a variable from the older context, or when two variable names within the same scope are easily confused.