Uckun, Serdar
Online Planning for a Material Control System for Liquid Crystal Display Manufacturing
Do, Minh (Palo Alto Research Center) | Okajima, Kazumichi (IHI Corporation) | Uckun, Serdar (Palo Alto Research Center) | Hasegawa, Fumio ( IHI Corporation ) | Kawano, Yukihiro (IHI Corporation) | Tanaka, Koji (IHI Corporation) | Crawford, Lara ( Palo Alto Research Center ) | Zhang, Ying ( Palo Alto Research Center ) | Ohashi, Aki (Palo Alto Research Center )
The hyper-modular printer control project at PARC has proven that a tightly integrated model-based planning and control framework can effectively control a complex physical system. Recently, we have successfully applied this framework to another application: planning for the Material Control System (MCS) of Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) manufacturing plant in a joint project between the Embedded Reasoning Area at PARC and the Products Development Center at the IHI Corporation. The model-based planner created at PARC was able to successfully solve a diverse set of test scenarios provided by IHI, including those that were deemed very difficult by the IHI experts. The short projecttime (2 months) proved that model-based planning is a flexible framework that can adapt quickly to novel applications. In this paper, we will introduce this complex domain and describe the adaptation process of the Plantrol online planner. The main contributions are: (1) introducing a successful application of general-purpose planning; (2) outline the timeline-based online temporal planner; and (3) description of a complex warehouse management problem that can serve as an attractive benchmark domain for planning.
AAAI Fall Symposium Reports
Ball, Jerry (Air Force Research Laboratory) | Arney, Chris (Army Research Office) | Collins, Samuel G. (Towson University) | Marcus, Mitchell (University of Pennsylvania) | Nirenburg, Sergei (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Chella, Antonio (University of Palermo) | Goebel, Kai (NASA Ames Research Center) | Li, Jason H. (Intelligent Automation, Inc.) | Lyell, Margaret (Intelligent Automation, Inc.) | Magerko, Brian (Michigan State University) | Manzotti, Riccardo (IULM University) | Morrison, Clayton T. (University of Southern California) | Oates, Tim (University of Maryland Baltimore County) | Riedl, Mark (University of Southern California) | Trajkovski, Goran P. (South University) | Truszkowski, Walt (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) | Uckun, Serdar (NASA Ames Research Center)
The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence presented the 2007 Fall Symposium Series on Friday through Sunday, November 9–11, at the Westin Arlington Gateway, Arlington, Virginia. The titles of the seven symposia were (1) AI and Consciousness: Theoretical Foundations and Current Approaches, (2) Artificial Intelligence for Prognostics, (3) Cognitive Approaches to Natural Language Processing, (4) Computational Approaches to Representation Change during Learning and Development, (5) Emergent Agents and Socialities: Social and Organizational Aspects of Intelligence, (6) Intelligent Narrative Technologies, and (7) Regarding the "Intelligence" in Distributed Intelligent Systems.
AAAI Fall Symposium Reports
Ball, Jerry (Air Force Research Laboratory) | Arney, Chris (Army Research Office) | Collins, Samuel G. (Towson University) | Marcus, Mitchell (University of Pennsylvania) | Nirenburg, Sergei (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Chella, Antonio (University of Palermo) | Goebel, Kai (NASA Ames Research Center) | Li, Jason H. (Intelligent Automation, Inc.) | Lyell, Margaret (Intelligent Automation, Inc.) | Magerko, Brian (Michigan State University) | Manzotti, Riccardo (IULM University) | Morrison, Clayton T. (University of Southern California) | Oates, Tim (University of Maryland Baltimore County) | Riedl, Mark (University of Southern California) | Trajkovski, Goran P. (South University) | Truszkowski, Walt (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) | Uckun, Serdar (NASA Ames Research Center)
Is it possible to build a conscious machine? There was an almost generally accepted of AI since its beginnings. The symposium was psychological, philosophical, and the first official place where scholars-- neuroscientific theories of consciousness; coming from different fields as far as (3) it is possible to address consciousness neuroscience and philosophy, psychology not only from neuroscience, and computer science--addressed psychology, and philosophy, the issue of consciousness in a but also from AI; and (4) the role of traditional AI environment. Furthermore, embodiment and situatedness is almost there was a good balance of universally recognized. A recurrent topic was the fact that The participants' talks centered on the topic of the symposium and generated the field of consciousness seems to be lively discussions of their research.