With the rise of large language models, neural text summarization has advanced significantly in recent years. However, even state-of-the-art models continue to rely heavily on high-quality human-annotated data for training and evaluation. Active learning is frequently used as an effective way to collect such datasets, especially when annotation resources are scarce. Active learning methods typically prioritize either uncertainty or diversity but have shown limited effectiveness in summarization, often being outperformed by random sampling. We present Diversity and Uncertainty Active Learning (DUAL), a novel algorithm that combines uncertainty and diversity to iteratively select and annotate samples that are both representative of the data distribution and challenging for the current model. DUAL addresses the selection of noisy samples in uncertainty-based methods and the limited exploration scope of diversity-based methods. Through extensive experiments with different summarization models and benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that DUAL consistently matches or outperforms the best performing strategies. Using visualizations and quantitative metrics, we provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and robustness of different active learning strategies, in an attempt to understand why these strategies haven't performed consistently in text summarization. Finally, we show that DUAL strikes a good balance between diversity and robustness.

The accuracy of deep neural networks is significantly influenced by the effectiveness of mini-batch construction during training. In single-label scenarios, such as binary and multi-class classification tasks, it has been demonstrated that batch selection algorithms preferring samples with higher uncertainty achieve better performance than difficulty-based methods. Although there are two batch selection methods tailored for multi-label data, none of them leverage important uncertainty information. Adapting the concept of uncertainty to multi-label data is not a trivial task, since there are two issues that should be tackled. First, traditional variance or entropy-based uncertainty measures ignore fluctuations of predictions within sliding windows and the importance of the current model state. Second, existing multi-label methods do not explicitly exploit the label correlations, particularly the uncertainty-based label correlations that evolve during the training process. In this paper, we propose an uncertainty-based multi-label batch selection algorithm. It assesses uncertainty for each label by considering differences between successive predictions and the confidence of current outputs, and further leverages dynamic uncertainty-based label correlations to emphasize instances whose uncertainty is synergistically expressed across multiple labels. Empirical studies demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in improving the performance and accelerating the convergence of various multi-label deep learning models.

Topic-controllable summarization is an emerging research area with a wide range of potential applications. However, existing approaches suffer from significant limitations. For example, the majority of existing methods built upon recurrent architectures, which can significantly limit their performance compared to more recent Transformer-based architectures, while they also require modifications to the model's architecture for controlling the topic. At the same time, there is currently no established evaluation metric designed specifically for topic-controllable summarization. This work proposes a new topic-oriented evaluation measure to automatically evaluate the generated summaries based on the topic affinity between the generated summary and the desired topic. The reliability of the proposed measure is demonstrated through appropriately designed human evaluation. In addition, we adapt topic embeddings to work with powerful Transformer architectures and propose a novel and efficient approach for guiding the summary generation through control tokens. Experimental results reveal that control tokens can achieve better performance compared to more complicated embedding-based approaches while also being significantly faster.

Deep neural network models have demonstrated their effectiveness in classifying multi-label data from various domains. Typically, they employ a training mode that combines mini-batches with optimizers, where each sample is randomly selected with equal probability when constructing mini-batches. However, the intrinsic class imbalance in multi-label data may bias the model towards majority labels, since samples relevant to minority labels may be underrepresented in each mini-batch. Meanwhile, during the training process, we observe that instances associated with minority labels tend to induce greater losses. Existing heuristic batch selection methods, such as priority selection of samples with high contribution to the objective function, i.e., samples with high loss, have been proven to accelerate convergence while reducing the loss and test error in single-label data. However, batch selection methods have not yet been applied and validated in multi-label data. In this study, we introduce a simple yet effective adaptive batch selection algorithm tailored to multi-label deep learning models. It adaptively selects each batch by prioritizing hard samples related to minority labels. A variant of our method also takes informative label correlations into consideration. Comprehensive experiments combining five multi-label deep learning models on thirteen benchmark datasets show that our method converges faster and performs better than random batch selection.

Long sentences have been a persistent issue in written communication for many years since they make it challenging for readers to grasp the main points or follow the initial intention of the writer. This survey, conducted using the PRISMA guidelines, systematically reviews two main strategies for addressing the issue of long sentences: a) sentence compression and b) sentence splitting. An increased trend of interest in this area has been observed since 2005, with significant growth after 2017. Current research is dominated by supervised approaches for both sentence compression and splitting. Yet, there is a considerable gap in weakly and self-supervised techniques, suggesting an opportunity for further research, especially in domains with limited data. In this survey, we categorize and group the most representative methods into a comprehensive taxonomy. We also conduct a comparative evaluation analysis of these methods on common sentence compression and splitting datasets. Finally, we discuss the challenges and limitations of current methods, providing valuable insights for future research directions. This survey is meant to serve as a comprehensive resource for addressing the complexities of long sentences. We aim to enable researchers to make further advancements in the field until long sentences are no longer a barrier to effective communication.

Objective: Semantic indexing of biomedical literature is usually done at the level of MeSH descriptors with several related but distinct biomedical concepts often grouped together and treated as a single topic. This study proposes a new method for the automated refinement of subject annotations at the level of MeSH concepts. Methods: Lacking labelled data, we rely on weak supervision based on concept occurrence in the abstract of an article, which is also enhanced by dictionary-based heuristics. In addition, we investigate deep learning approaches, making design choices to tackle the particular challenges of this task. The new method is evaluated on a large-scale retrospective scenario, based on concepts that have been promoted to descriptors. Results: In our experiments concept occurrence was the strongest heuristic achieving a macro-F1 score of about 0.63 across several labels. The proposed method improved it further by more than 4pp. Conclusion: The results suggest that concept occurrence is a strong heuristic for refining the coarse-grained labels at the level of MeSH concepts and the proposed method improves it further.

Multi-target regression is useful in a plethora of applications. Although random forest models perform well in these tasks, they are often difficult to interpret. Interpretability is crucial in machine learning, especially when it can directly impact human well-being. Although model-agnostic techniques exist for multi-target regression, specific techniques tailored to random forest models are not available. To address this issue, we propose a technique that provides rule-based interpretations for instances made by a random forest model for multi-target regression, influenced by a recent model-specific technique for random forest interpretability. The proposed technique was evaluated through extensive experiments and shown to offer competitive interpretations compared to state-of-the-art techniques.

Real estate markets depend on various methods to predict housing prices, including models that have been trained on datasets of residential or commercial properties. Most studies endeavor to create more accurate machine learning models by utilizing data such as basic property characteristics as well as urban features like distances from amenities and road accessibility. Even though environmental factors like noise pollution can potentially affect prices, the research around this topic is limited. One of the reasons is the lack of data. In this paper, we reconstruct and make publicly available a general purpose noise pollution dataset based on published studies conducted by the Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy for the city of Thessaloniki, Greece. Then, we train ensemble machine learning models, like XGBoost, on property data for different areas of Thessaloniki to investigate the way noise influences prices through interpretability evaluation techniques. Our study provides a new noise pollution dataset that not only demonstrates the impact noise has on housing prices, but also indicates that the influence of noise on prices significantly varies among different areas of the same city.

Automated Machine Learning-based systems' integration into a wide range of tasks has expanded as a result of their performance and speed. Although there are numerous advantages to employing ML-based systems, if they are not interpretable, they should not be used in critical, high-risk applications where human lives are at risk. To address this issue, researchers and businesses have been focusing on finding ways to improve the interpretability of complex ML systems, and several such methods have been developed. Indeed, there are so many developed techniques that it is difficult for practitioners to choose the best among them for their applications, even when using evaluation metrics. As a result, the demand for a selection tool, a meta-explanation technique based on a high-quality evaluation metric, is apparent. In this paper, we present a local meta-explanation technique which builds on top of the truthfulness metric, which is a faithfulness-based metric. We demonstrate the effectiveness of both the technique and the metric by concretely defining all the concepts and through experimentation.

Transformers are widely used in natural language processing, where they consistently achieve state-of-the-art performance. This is mainly due to their attention-based architecture, which allows them to model rich linguistic relations between (sub)words. However, transformers are difficult to interpret. Being able to provide reasoning for its decisions is an important property for a model in domains where human lives are affected. With transformers finding wide use in such fields, the need for interpretability techniques tailored to them arises. We propose a new technique that selects the most faithful attention-based interpretation among the several ones that can be obtained by combining different head, layer and matrix operations. In addition, two variations are introduced towards (i) reducing the computational complexity, thus being faster and friendlier to the environment, and (ii) enhancing the performance in multi-label data. We further propose a new faithfulness metric that is more suitable for transformer models and exhibits high correlation with the area under the precision-recall curve based on ground truth rationales. We validate the utility of our contributions with a series of quantitative and qualitative experiments on seven datasets.