TECHNICAL NOTE - TN-2023-02-28, FEBRUARY 2023. 1 Abstract This short technical note points out an erroneous claim about a new rule of combination of basic belief assignments presented recently by Kenn et al. in [1], referred as Kenn's rule of combination (or just as KRC for short). We prove thanks a very simple counter-example that Kenn's rule is not associative. Consequently, the results of the method proposed by Kenn et al. highly depends on the ad-hoc sequential order chosen for the fusion process as proposed by the authors. This serious problem casts in doubt the interest of this method and its real ability to provide trustful results and to make good decisions to help for precise breast cancer therapy. Recently a paper devoted to the Breast Cancer Precision Therapy by Kenn et al. [1] attracted our attention for two main reasons: 1) this application of information fusion is very interesting and important; 2) Kenn's et al. method is based on a new rule of combination of basic belief assignments (BBAs).

In this paper the behavior of three combinational rules for temporal/sequential attribute data fusion for target type estimation are analyzed. The comparative analysis is based on: Dempster's fusion rule proposed in Dempster-Shafer Theory; Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule no. 5 (PCR5), proposed in Dezert-Smarandache Theory and one alternative class fusion rule, connecting the combination rules for information fusion with particular fuzzy operators, focusing on the t-norm based Conjunctive rule as an analog of the ordinary conjunctive rule and t-conorm based Disjunctive rule as an analog of the ordinary disjunctive rule. The way how different t-conorms and t-norms functions within TCN fusion rule influence over target type estimation performance is studied and estimated.