Standard temporal planning assumes that planning takes place offline and then execution starts at time 0. Recently, situated temporal planning was introduced, where planning starts at time 0 and execution occurs after planning terminates. Situated temporal planning reflects a more realistic scenario where time passes during planning. However, in situated temporal planning a complete plan must be generated before any action is executed. In some problems with time pressure, timing is too tight to complete planning before the first action must be executed. For example, an autonomous car that has a truck backing towards it should probably move out of the way now and plan how to get to its destination later. In this paper, we propose a new problem setting: concurrent planning and execution, in which actions can be dispatched (executed) before planning terminates. Unlike previous work on planning and execution, we must handle wall clock deadlines that affect action applicability and goal achievement (as in situated planning) while also supporting dispatching actions before a complete plan has been found. We extend previous work on metareasoning for situated temporal planning to develop an algorithm for this new setting. Our empirical evaluation shows that when there is strong time pressure, our approach outperforms situated temporal planning.

In the Multi-Agent Meeting (MAM) problem, the task is to find a meeting location for multiple agents, as well as a path for each agent to that location. In this paper, we introduce MM*, a Multi-Directional Search algorithm that finds the optimal meeting location under different cost functions. MM* generalizes the Meet in the Middle (MM) bidirectional search algorithm to the case of finding optimal meeting locations for multiple agents. A number of admissible heuristics are proposed and experiments demonstrate the benefits of MM*.

fMM and GBFSH are two prominent bidirectional heuristic search algorithms. Over the past few years, there has been a great deal of theoretical and empirical work on both of these algorithms. As part of the research conducted on these algorithms, some interesting theoretical properties were proven for fMM and not for GBFSH and vice versa. In addition, both of them are used as benchmarks for evaluation bidirectional heuristic search algorithms. In this paper we show that fMM infused by a lower-bound propagation and GBFSH are equivalent. In essence, every instance of fMM can be mapped to an instance of GBFSH that expands the exact sequence of nodes and vice versa. This equivalence indicates that all theoretical properties proven for one algorithm hold for both algorithm, and that future analyses and benchmarks can consider only one of these algorithms.