Compared to physics-based computational manufacturing, data-driven models such as machine learning (ML) are alternative approaches to achieve smart manufacturing. However, the data-driven ML's "black box" nature has presented a challenge to interpreting its outcomes. On the other hand, governing physical laws are not effectively utilized to develop data-efficient ML algorithms. To leverage the advantages of ML and physical laws of advanced manufacturing, this paper focuses on the development of a physics-informed machine learning (PIML) model by integrating neural networks and physical laws to improve model accuracy, transparency, and generalization with case studies in laser metal deposition (LMD).

Benchmarking is the de-facto standard for evaluating LLMs, due to its speed, replicability and low cost. However, recent work has pointed out that the majority of the open source benchmarks available today have been contaminated or leaked into LLMs, meaning that LLMs have access to test data during pretraining and/or fine-tuning. This raises serious concerns about the validity of benchmarking studies conducted so far and the future of evaluation using benchmarks. To solve this problem, we propose Private Benchmarking, a solution where test datasets are kept private and models are evaluated without revealing the test data to the model. We describe various scenarios (depending on the trust placed on model owners or dataset owners), and present solutions to avoid data contamination using private benchmarking. For scenarios where the model weights need to be kept private, we describe solutions from confidential computing and cryptography that can aid in private benchmarking. We build an end-to-end system, TRUCE, that enables such private benchmarking showing that the overheads introduced to protect models and benchmark are negligible (in the case of confidential computing) and tractable (when cryptographic security is required). Finally, we also discuss solutions to the problem of benchmark dataset auditing, to ensure that private benchmarks are of sufficiently high quality.

The timely identification of significant memory concern (SMC) is crucial for proactive cognitive health management, especially in an aging population. Detecting SMC early enables timely intervention and personalized care, potentially slowing cognitive disorder progression. This study presents a state-of-the-art review followed by a comprehensive evaluation of machine learning models within the randomized neural networks (RNNs) and hyperplane-based classifiers (HbCs) family to investigate SMC diagnosis thoroughly. Utilizing the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 2 (ADNI2) dataset, 111 individuals with SMC and 111 healthy older adults are analyzed based on T1W magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, extracting rich features. This analysis is based on baseline structural MRI (sMRI) scans, extracting rich features from gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), Jacobian determinant (JD), and cortical thickness (CT) measurements. In RNNs, deep random vector functional link (dRVFL) and ensemble dRVFL (edRVFL) emerge as the best classifiers in terms of performance metrics in the identification of SMC. In HbCs, Kernelized pinball general twin support vector machine (Pin-GTSVM-K) excels in CT and WM features, whereas Linear Pin-GTSVM (Pin-GTSVM-L) and Linear intuitionistic fuzzy TSVM (IFTSVM-L) performs well in the JD and GM features sets, respectively. This comprehensive evaluation emphasizes the critical role of feature selection and model choice in attaining an effective classifier for SMC diagnosis. The inclusion of statistical analyses further reinforces the credibility of the results, affirming the rigor of this analysis. The performance measures exhibit the suitability of this framework in aiding researchers with the automated and accurate assessment of SMC. The source codes of the algorithms and datasets used in this study are available at https://github.com/mtanveer1/SMC.

Machine learning models are increasingly used to make decisions that affect human lives, society and the environment, in areas such as medical diagnosis, criminal justice and public policy. However, these models are often complex and opaque--especially with the increasing ubiquity of deep learning and generative AI--making it difficult to understand how and why they produce certain predictions. Explainable AI (XAI) is a field of research that aims to provide interpretable and transparent explanations for the outputs of machine learning models. The growing demand for model interpretability, along with a trend for'data-driven' decisions, has the unexpected side-effect of creating an increased incentive for abuse and manipulation. Data analysts may have a vested interest or be pressured to present a certain explanation for a model's predictions, whether to confirm a pre-specified conclusion, to conceal a hidden agenda, or to avoid ethical scrutiny. In this paper, we introduce the concept of explanation hacking or X-hacking, a form of p-hacking applied to XAI metrics. X-hacking refers to the practice of deliberately searching for and selecting models that produce a desired explanation while maintaining'acceptable' predictive performance, according to some benchmark. Unlike fairwashing attacks, X-hacking does not involve manipulating the model architecture or its explanations; rather it explores plausible combinations of analysis decisions.

Machine learning (ML) has employed various discretization methods to partition numerical attributes into intervals. However, an effective discretization technique remains elusive in many ML applications, such as association rule mining. Moreover, the existing discretization techniques do not reflect best the impact of the independent numerical factor on the dependent numerical target factor. This research aims to establish a benchmark approach for numerical attribute partitioning. We conduct an extensive analysis of human perceptions of partitioning a numerical attribute and compare these perceptions with the results obtained from our two proposed measures. We also examine the perceptions of experts in data science, statistics, and engineering by employing numerical data visualization techniques. The analysis of collected responses reveals that $68.7\%$ of human responses approximately closely align with the values generated by our proposed measures. Based on these findings, our proposed measures may be used as one of the methods for discretizing the numerical attributes.

Synthesizing inductive loop invariants is fundamental to automating program verification. In this work, we observe that Large Language Models (such as gpt-3.5 or gpt-4) are capable of synthesizing loop invariants for a class of programs in a 0-shot setting, yet require several samples to generate the correct invariants. This can lead to a large number of calls to a program verifier to establish an invariant. To address this issue, we propose a {\it re-ranking} approach for the generated results of LLMs. We have designed a ranker that can distinguish between correct inductive invariants and incorrect attempts based on the problem definition. The ranker is optimized as a contrastive ranker. Experimental results demonstrate that this re-ranking mechanism significantly improves the ranking of correct invariants among the generated candidates, leading to a notable reduction in the number of calls to a verifier.

Numerical association rule mining is a widely used variant of the association rule mining technique, and it has been extensively used in discovering patterns and relationships in numerical data. Initially, researchers and scientists integrated numerical attributes in association rule mining using various discretization approaches; however, over time, a plethora of alternative methods have emerged in this field. Unfortunately, the increase of alternative methods has resulted into a significant knowledge gap in understanding diverse techniques employed in numerical association rule mining -- this paper attempts to bridge this knowledge gap by conducting a comprehensive systematic literature review. We provide an in-depth study of diverse methods, algorithms, metrics, and datasets derived from 1,140 scholarly articles published from the inception of numerical association rule mining in the year 1996 to 2022. In compliance with the inclusion, exclusion, and quality evaluation criteria, 68 papers were chosen to be extensively evaluated. To the best of our knowledge, this systematic literature review is the first of its kind to provide an exhaustive analysis of the current literature and previous surveys on numerical association rule mining. The paper discusses important research issues, the current status, and future possibilities of numerical association rule mining. On the basis of this systematic review, the article also presents a novel discretization measure that contributes by providing a partitioning of numerical data that meets well human perception of partitions.

When training deep neural networks, keeping all tensors in high precision (e.g., 32-bit or even 16-bit floats) is often wasteful. However, keeping all tensors in low precision (e.g., 8-bit floats) can lead to unacceptable accuracy loss. Hence, it is important to use a precision assignment -- a mapping from all tensors (arising in training) to precision levels (high or low) -- that keeps most of the tensors in low precision and leads to sufficiently accurate models. We provide a technique that explores this memory-accuracy tradeoff by generating precision assignments for convolutional neural networks that (i) use less memory and (ii) lead to more accurate convolutional networks at the same time, compared to the precision assignments considered by prior work in low-precision floating-point training. We evaluate our technique on image classification tasks by training convolutional networks on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. Our method typically provides > 2x memory reduction over a baseline precision assignment while preserving training accuracy, and gives further reductions by trading off accuracy. Compared to other baselines which sometimes cause training to diverge, our method provides similar or better memory reduction while avoiding divergence.

Marker-based Optical Motion Capture (OMC) systems and associated musculoskeletal (MSK) modelling predictions offer non-invasively obtainable insights into in vivo joint and muscle loading, aiding clinical decision-making. However, an OMC system is lab-based, expensive, and requires a line of sight. Inertial Motion Capture (IMC) systems are widely-used alternatives, which are portable, user-friendly, and relatively low-cost, although with lesser accuracy. Irrespective of the choice of motion capture technique, one needs to use an MSK model to obtain the kinematic and kinetic outputs, which is a computationally expensive tool increasingly well approximated by machine learning (ML) methods. Here, we present an ML approach to map experimentally recorded IMC data to the human upper-extremity MSK model outputs computed from ('gold standard') OMC input data. Essentially, we aim to predict higher-quality MSK outputs from the much easier-to-obtain IMC data. We use OMC and IMC data simultaneously collected for the same subjects to train different ML architectures that predict OMC-driven MSK outputs from IMC measurements. In particular, we employed various neural network (NN) architectures, such as Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) (vanilla, Long Short-Term Memory, and Gated Recurrent Unit) and searched for the best-fit model through an exhaustive search in the hyperparameters space in both subject-exposed (SE) & subject-naive (SN) settings. We observed a comparable performance for both FFNN & RNN models, which have a high degree of agreement (ravg, SE, FFNN = 0.90+/-0.19, ravg, SE, RNN = 0.89+/-0.17, ravg, SN, FFNN = 0.84+/-0.23, & ravg, SN, RNN = 0.78+/-0.23) with the desired OMC-driven MSK estimates for held-out test data. Mapping IMC inputs to OMC-driven MSK outputs using ML models could be instrumental in transitioning MSK modelling from 'lab to field'.

Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a brain disorder where different people experience different symptoms, such as hallucination, delusion, flat-talk, disorganized thinking, etc. In the long term, this can cause severe effects and diminish life expectancy by more than ten years. Therefore, early and accurate diagnosis of SCZ is prevalent, and modalities like structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), functional MRI (fMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and electroencephalogram (EEG) assist in witnessing the brain abnormalities of the patients. Moreover, for accurate diagnosis of SCZ, researchers have used machine learning (ML) algorithms for the past decade to distinguish the brain patterns of healthy and SCZ brains using MRI and fMRI images. This paper seeks to acquaint SCZ researchers with ML and to discuss its recent applications to the field of SCZ study. This paper comprehensively reviews state-of-the-art techniques such as ML classifiers, artificial neural network (ANN), deep learning (DL) models, methodological fundamentals, and applications with previous studies. The motivation of this paper is to benefit from finding the research gaps that may lead to the development of a new model for accurate SCZ diagnosis. The paper concludes with the research finding, followed by the future scope that directly contributes to new research directions.