In multi-agent planning, agents jointly compute a plan that achieves mutual goals, keeping certain information private to the individual agents. Agents' coordination is achieved through the transmission of messages. These messages can be a source of privacy leakage as they can permit a malicious agent to collect information about other agents' actions and search states. In this paper, we investigate the usage of novelty techniques in the context of (decentralised) multi-agent privacy-preserving planning, addressing the challenges related to the agents' privacy and performance. In particular, we show that the use of novelty based techniques can significantly reduce the number of messages transmitted among agents, better preserving their privacy and improving their performance. An experimental study analyses the effectiveness of our techniques and compares them with the state-of-the-art. Finally, we evaluate the robustness of our approach, considering different delays in the transmission of messages as they would occur in overloaded networks, due for example to massive attacks or critical situations.

In multi-agent planning, preserving the agents' privacy has become an increasingly popular research topic. For preserving the agents' privacy, agents jointly compute a plan that achieves mutual goals by keeping certain information private to the individual agents. Unfortunately, this can severely restrict the accuracy of the heuristic functions used while searching for solutions. It has been recently shown that, for centralized planning, the performance of goal oriented search can be improved by combining goal oriented search and width-based search. The combination of these techniques has been called best-first width search. In this paper, we investigate the usage of best-first width search in the context of (decentralised) multi-agent privacy-preserving planning, addressing the challenges related to the agents' privacy and performance. In particular, we show that best-first width search is a very effective approach over several benchmark domains, even when the search is driven by heuristics that roughly estimate the distance from goal states, computed without using the private information of other agents. An experimental study analyses the effectiveness of our techniques and compares them with the state-of-the-art.

The development of a large number of domain-independentplanners is leading to the use of planning engines in a widerange of applications. This is despite the complexity issues inherent in plan generation, which are exacerbated by the separation of planner logic from domain knowledge. However, this separation supports the use of reformulation and configuration techniques, which transform the model representation in order to improve the planner's performance. In this paper, we investigate how the performance of domain-independent planners can be improved by problem model configuration. We introduce a fully automated method for this configuration task, that considers problem-specific aspects extracted by exploiting a problem- and domain-independent representation of the instance. Our extensive experimental analysis shows that this reformulation technique can have a significant impact on planners' performance.

We present an extension of the planning framework based on action graphs and local search to deal with PDDL2.1 temporal problems requiring concurrency, while previously the approach could only solve problems admitting a sequential solution. The paper introduces a revised plan representation supporting concurrency and some new search techniques using it, which are implemented in a new version of the LPG planner. An experimental analysis indicates that the proposed approach is suitable to temporal planning with requiring concurrency and is competitive with state-of-the-art planners.