Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have gained significant attention in recent years due to their ability to learn representations of graph structured data. Two common methods for training GNNs are mini-batch training and full-graph training. Since these two methods require different training pipelines and systems optimizations, two separate categories of GNN training systems emerged, each tailored for one method. Works that introduce systems belonging to a particular category predominantly compare them with other systems within the same category, offering limited or no comparison with systems from the other category. Some prior work also justifies its focus on one specific training method by arguing that it achieves higher accuracy than the alternative. The literature, however, has incomplete and contradictory evidence in this regard. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive empirical comparison of full-graph and mini-batch GNN training systems to get a clearer picture of the state of the art in the field. We find that the mini-batch training systems we consider consistently converge faster than the full-graph training ones across multiple datasets, GNN models, and system configurations, with speedups between 2.4x - 15.2x. We also find that both training techniques converge to similar accuracy values, so comparing systems across the two categories in terms of time-to-accuracy is a sound approach.

Large-scale graphs with billions of edges are ubiquitous in many industries, science, and engineering fields such as recommendation systems, social graph analysis, knowledge base, material science, and biology. Graph neural networks (GNN), an emerging class of machine learning models, are increasingly adopted to learn on these graphs due to their superior performance in various graph analytics tasks. Mini-batch training is commonly adopted to train on large graphs, and data parallelism is the standard approach to scale mini-batch training to multiple GPUs. In this paper, we argue that several fundamental performance bottlenecks of GNN training systems have to do with inherent limitations of the data parallel approach. We then propose split parallelism, a novel parallel mini-batch training paradigm. We implement split parallelism in a novel system called gsplit and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art systems such as DGL, Quiver, and PaGraph.