The first two methods are related to mean field ideas known in Statistical Physics. The third approach is based on Bayesian online approach which was motivated by recent results in the Statistical Mechanics of Neural Networks. We present simulation results showing: 1. that the mean field Bayesian evidence may be used for hyperparameter tuning and 2. that the online approach may achieve a low training error fast. 1 Introduction Gaussian processes provide promising nonparametric Bayesian approaches to regression andclassification [2, 1].

The first two methods are related to mean field ideas known in Statistical Physics. The third approach is based on Bayesian online approach which was motivated by recent results in the Statistical Mechanics of Neural Networks. We present simulation results showing: 1. that the mean field Bayesian evidence may be used for hyperparameter tuning and 2. that the online approach may achieve a low training error fast. 1 Introduction Gaussian processes provide promising nonparametric Bayesian approaches to regression and classification [2, 1].

Bayesian methods have been successfully applied to regression and classification problems in multi-layer perceptrons. We present a novel application of Bayesian techniques to Radial Basis Function networks by developing a Gaussian approximation to the posterior distribution which, for fixed basis function widths, is analytic in the parameters. The setting of regularization constants by crossvalidation iswasteful as only a single optimal parameter estimate is retained. We treat this issue by assigning prior distributions to these constants, which are then adapted in light of the data under a simple re-estimation formula. 1 Introduction Radial Basis Function networks are popular regression and classification tools[lO]. For fixed basis function centers, RBFs are linear in their parameters and can therefore betrained with simple one shot linear algebra techniques[lO]. The use of unsupervised techniques to fix the basis function centers is, however, not generally optimal since setting the basis function centers using density estimation on the input data alone takes no account of the target values associated with that data. Ideally, therefore, we should include the target values in the training procedure[7, 3, 9]. Unfortunately, allowingcenters to adapt to the training targets leads to the RBF being a nonlinear function of its parameters, and training becomes more problematic. Most methods that perform supervised training of RBF parameters minimize the ·Present address: SNN, University of Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

We employ both master equation and order parameter approaches to analyze the asymptotic dynamics of online learning with different learning rate annealing schedules. We examine the relations between the results obtained by the two approaches and obtain new results on the optimal decay coefficients and their dependence on the number of hidden nodes in a two layer architecture.

Bayesian methods have been successfully applied to regression and classification problems in multi-layer perceptrons. We present a novel application of Bayesian techniques to Radial Basis Function networks by developing a Gaussian approximation to the posterior distribution which, for fixed basis function widths, is analytic in the parameters. The setting of regularization constants by crossvalidation is wasteful as only a single optimal parameter estimate is retained. We treat this issue by assigning prior distributions to these constants, which are then adapted in light of the data under a simple re-estimation formula. 1 Introduction Radial Basis Function networks are popular regression and classification tools[lO]. For fixed basis function centers, RBFs are linear in their parameters and can therefore be trained with simple one shot linear algebra techniques[lO]. The use of unsupervised techniques to fix the basis function centers is, however, not generally optimal since setting the basis function centers using density estimation on the input data alone takes no account of the target values associated with that data. Ideally, therefore, we should include the target values in the training procedure[7, 3, 9]. Unfortunately, allowing centers to adapt to the training targets leads to the RBF being a nonlinear function of its parameters, and training becomes more problematic. Most methods that perform supervised training of RBF parameters minimize the ·Present address: SNN, University of Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 21, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

The latter studies are based on examining the Kramers Moyal expansion of the master equation for the weight space probability densities. A different approach, based on the deterministic dynamics of macroscopic quantities called order parameters, has been recently presented [6, 7].