Which fairness metrics are appropriately applicable in your contexts? There may be instances of discordance regarding the perception of fairness, even when the outcomes comply with established fairness metrics. Several surveys have been conducted to evaluate fairness metrics with human perceptions of fairness. However, these surveys were limited in scope, including only a few hundred participants within a single country. In this study, we conduct an international survey to evaluate the appropriateness of various fairness metrics in decision-making scenarios. We collected responses from 1,000 participants in each of China, France, Japan, and the United States, amassing a total of 4,000 responses, to analyze the preferences of fairness metrics. Our survey consists of three distinct scenarios paired with four fairness metrics, and each participant answers their preference for the fairness metric in each case. This investigation explores the relationship between personal attributes and the choice of fairness metrics, uncovering a significant influence of national context on these preferences.

Motivated by the empirical power law of the distributions of credits (e.g., the number of "likes") of viral posts in social media, we introduce the high-dimensional tail index regression and methods of estimation and inference for its parameters. We propose a regularized estimator, establish its consistency, and derive its convergence rate. To conduct inference, we propose to debias the regularized estimate, and establish the asymptotic normality of the debiased estimator. Simulation studies support our theory. These methods are applied to text analyses of viral posts in X (formerly Twitter) concerning LGBTQ+.

Node classification is one of the hottest tasks in graph analysis. Though existing studies have explored various node representations in directed and undirected graphs, they have overlooked the distinctions of their capabilities to capture the information of graphs. To tackle the limitation, we investigate various combinations of node representations (aggregated features vs. adjacency lists) and edge direction awareness within an input graph (directed vs. undirected). We address the first empirical study to benchmark the performance of various GNNs that use either combination of node representations and edge direction awareness. Our experiments demonstrate that no single combination stably achieves state-of-the-art results across datasets, which indicates that we need to select appropriate combinations depending on the dataset characteristics. In response, we propose a simple yet holistic classification method A2DUG which leverages all combinations of node representations in directed and undirected graphs. We demonstrate that A2DUG stably performs well on various datasets and improves the accuracy up to 11.29 compared with the state-of-the-art methods. To spur the development of new methods, we publicly release our complete codebase under the MIT license.

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful tools for performing data science tasks in various domains. Although we use GNNs in wide application scenarios, it is a laborious task for researchers and practitioners to design/select optimal GNN architectures in diverse graphs. To save human efforts and computational costs, graph neural architecture search (Graph NAS) has been used to search for a sub-optimal GNN architecture that combines existing components. However, there are no existing Graph NAS methods that satisfy explainability, efficiency, and adaptability to various graphs. Therefore, we propose an efficient and explainable Graph NAS method, called ExGNAS, which consists of (i) a simple search space that can adapt to various graphs and (ii) a search algorithm that makes the decision process explainable. The search space includes only fundamental functions that can handle homophilic and heterophilic graphs. The search algorithm efficiently searches for the best GNN architecture via Monte-Carlo tree search without neural models. The combination of our search space and algorithm achieves finding accurate GNN models and the important functions within the search space. We comprehensively evaluate our method compared with twelve hand-crafted GNN architectures and three Graph NAS methods in four graphs. Our experimental results show that ExGNAS increases AUC up to 3.6 and reduces run time up to 78\% compared with the state-of-the-art Graph NAS methods. Furthermore, we show ExGNAS is effective in analyzing the difference between GNN architectures in homophilic and heterophilic graphs.

Due to the significant increase in the size of spatial data, it is essential to use distributed parallel processing systems to efficiently analyze spatial data. In this paper, we first study learned spatial data partitioning, which effectively assigns groups of big spatial data to computers based on locations of data by using machine learning techniques. We formalize spatial data partitioning in the context of reinforcement learning and develop a novel deep reinforcement learning algorithm. Our learning algorithm leverages features of spatial data partitioning and prunes ineffective learning processes to find optimal partitions efficiently. Our experimental study, which uses Apache Sedona and real-world spatial data, demonstrates that our method efficiently finds partitions for accelerating distance join queries and reduces the workload run time by up to 59.4%.

In recent years, machine learning-based cardinality estimation methods are replacing traditional methods. This change is expected to contribute to one of the most important applications of cardinality estimation, the query optimizer, to speed up query processing. However, none of the existing methods do not precisely estimate cardinalities when relational schemas consist of many tables with strong correlations between tables/attributes. This paper describes that multiple density estimators can be combined to effectively target the cardinality estimation of data with large and complex schemas having strong correlations. We propose Scardina, a new join cardinality estimation method using multiple partitioned models based on the schema structure.

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved great success on a node classification task. Despite the broad interest in developing and evaluating GNNs, they have been assessed with limited benchmark datasets. As a result, the existing evaluation of GNNs lacks fine-grained analysis from various characteristics of graphs. Motivated by this, we conduct extensive experiments with a synthetic graph generator that can generate graphs having controlled characteristics for fine-grained analysis. Our empirical studies clarify the strengths and weaknesses of GNNs from four major characteristics of real-world graphs with class labels of nodes, i.e., 1) class size distributions (balanced vs. imbalanced), 2) edge connection proportions between classes (homophilic vs. heterophilic), 3) attribute values (biased vs. random), and 4) graph sizes (small vs. large). In addition, to foster future research on GNNs, we publicly release our codebase that allows users to evaluate various GNNs with various graphs. We hope this work offers interesting insights for future research.

Urban air pollution is a major environmental problem affecting human health and quality of life. Monitoring stations have been established to continuously obtain air quality information, but they do not cover all areas. Thus, there are numerous methods for spatially fine-grained air quality inference. Since existing methods aim to infer air quality of locations only in monitored cities, they do not assume inferring air quality in unmonitored cities. In this paper, we first study the air quality inference in unmonitored cities. To accurately infer air quality in unmonitored cities, we propose a neural network-based approach AIREX. The novelty of AIREX is employing a mixture-of-experts approach, which is a machine learning technique based on the divide-and-conquer principle, to learn correlations of air quality between multiple cities. To further boost the performance, it employs attention mechanisms to compute impacts of air quality inference from the monitored cities to the locations in the unmonitored city. We show, through experiments on a real-world air quality dataset, that AIREX achieves higher accuracy than state-of-the-art methods.