In this work, we deepen on the use of normalizing flows for causal reasoning. Specifically, we first leverage recent results on non-linear ICA to show that causal models are identifiable from observational data given a causal ordering, and thus can be recovered using autoregressive normalizing flows (NFs). Second, we analyze different design and learning choices for causal normalizing flows to capture the underlying causal data-generating process. Third, we describe how to implement the do-operator in causal NFs, and thus, how to answer interventional and counterfactual questions. Finally, in our experiments, we validate our design and training choices through a comprehensive ablation study; compare causal NFs to other approaches for approximating causal models; and empirically demonstrate that causal NFs can be used to address real-world problems, where the presence of mixed discrete-continuous data and partial knowledge on the causal graph is the norm. The code for this work can be found at https://github.com/psanch21/causal-flows.

We propose a new method to evaluate GANs, namely EvalGAN. EvalGAN relies on a test set to directly measure the reconstruction quality in the original sample space (no auxiliary networks are necessary), and it also computes the (log)likelihood for the reconstructed samples in the test set. Further, EvalGAN is agnostic to the GAN algorithm and the dataset. We decided to test it on three state-of-the-art GANs over the well-known CIFAR-10 and CelebA datasets.