We provide an analysis of the turbo decoding algorithm (TDA) setting involving Gaussian densities. In this context, we arein a able to show that the algorithm converges and that - somewhat the density generated by the TDA may differsurprisingly - though significantly from the desired posterior density, the means of these two densities coincide.

We propose and analyze an algorithm that approximates solutions to the problem of optimal stopping in a discounted irreducible aperiodic Markovchain. The scheme involves the use of linear combinations offixed basis functions to approximate a Q-function. The weights of the linear combination are incrementally updated through an iterative process similar to Q-Iearning, involving simulation ofthe underlying Markov chain. Due to space limitations, we only provide an overview of a proof of convergence (with probability 1)and bounds on the approximation error. This is the first theoretical result that establishes the soundness of a Q-Iearninglike algorithmwhen combined with arbitrary linear function approximators tosolve a sequential decision problem.

We propose and analyze an algorithm that approximates solutions to the problem of optimal stopping in a discounted irreducible aperiodic Markov chain. The scheme involves the use of linear combinations of fixed basis functions to approximate a Q-function. The weights of the linear combination are incrementally updated through an iterative process similar to Q-Iearning, involving simulation of the underlying Markov chain. Due to space limitations, we only provide an overview of a proof of convergence (with probability 1) and bounds on the approximation error. This is the first theoretical result that establishes the soundness of a Q-Iearninglike algorithm when combined with arbitrary linear function approximators to solve a sequential decision problem.

We present new results about the temporal-difference learning algorithm, as applied to approximating the cost-to-go function of a Markov chain using linear function approximators. The algorithm we analyze performs online updating of a parameter vector during a single endless trajectory of an aperiodic irreducible finite state Markov chain. Results include convergence (with probability 1), a characterization of the limit of convergence, and a bound on the resulting approximation error. In addition to establishing new and stronger results than those previously available, our analysis is based on a new line of reasoning that provides new intuition about the dynamics of temporal-difference learning. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of two counterexamples with regards to the Significance of online updating and linearly parameterized function approximators. 1 INTRODUCTION The problem of predicting the expected long-term future cost (or reward) of a stochastic dynamic system manifests itself in both time-series prediction and control.

The algorithm weanalyze performs online updating of a parameter vector during a single endless trajectory of an aperiodic irreducible finite state Markov chain. Results include convergence (with probability 1), a characterization of the limit of convergence, and a bound on the resulting approximation error. In addition to establishing new and stronger results than those previously available, our analysis is based on a new line of reasoning that provides new intuition about the dynamics of temporal-difference learning. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of two counterexamples with regards to the Significance of online updating and linearly parameterized function approximators. 1 INTRODUCTION The problem of predicting the expected long-term future cost (or reward) of a stochastic dynamic system manifests itself in both time-series prediction and control. Anexample in time-series prediction is that of estimating the net present value of a corporation, as a discounted sum of its future cash flows, based on the current state of its operations. In control, the ability to predict long-term future cost as a function of state enables the ranking of alternative states in order to guide decision-making. Indeed, such predictions constitute the cost-to-go function that is central to dynamic programming and optimal control (Bertsekas, 1995). Temporal-difference learning, originally proposed by Sutton (1988), is a method for approximating long-term future cost as a function of current state.

Recently, however, there have been some successful applications of neural networks in a totally different context - that of sequential decision making under uncertainty (stochastic control). Stochastic control problems have been studied extensively in the operations research and control theory literature for a long time, using the methodology of dynamic programming [Bertsekas, 1995]. In dynamic programming, the most important object is the cost-to-go (or value) junction, which evaluates the expected future 1046 B. V. ROY, 1. N. TSITSIKLIS

Recently, however, there have been some successful applications of neural networks in a totally different context - that of sequential decision making under uncertainty (stochastic control). Stochastic control problems have been studied extensively in the operations research and control theory literature for a long time, using the methodology of dynamic programming [Bertsekas, 1995]. In dynamic programming, the most important object is the cost-to-go (or value) junction, which evaluates the expected future 1046 B.V. ROY, 1. N. TSITSIKLIS