Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects from observational data has become an important problem. It plays a crucial role in determining the individualized causal effects of a treatment, which then leads to a personalized assignment of optimal treatment (Wendling et al., 2018; Rekkas et al., 2020). Estimation of such heterogeneity however requires reasonable representations from each treatment subgroup. With the increasing availability of large-scale health outcome data such as electronic health records (EHR) data in recent years, it has become possible to develop individualized treatment strategies efficiently. This led to the development of several novel statistical methods, primarily tailored for binary treatment scenarios (Wendling et al., 2018; Cheng et al., 2020), with some accommodating multiple treatment settings (Brown et al., 2020; Chalkou et al., 2021). Most of these approaches are specifically designed for estimating population average treatment effects (ATEs) (Van Der Laan and Rubin, 2006; Chernozhukov et al., 2018; McCaffrey et al., 2013) and more recently, methods are being developed to estimate conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) (Taddy et al., 2016; Wager and Athey, 2018; Künzel et al., 2019; Nie and Wager, 2021). Here, we tackle a generic problem of heterogeneous treatment effect or CATE estimation in a multi-treatment setting, where the treatment responses may share some commonalities.

In this paper, we describe the systems submitted by our IITP-AINLPML team in the shared task of SocialNLP 2020, EmotionGIF 2020, on predicting the category(ies) of a GIF response for a given unlabelled tweet. For the round 1 phase of the task, we propose an attention-based Bi-directional GRU network trained on both the tweet (text) and their replies (text wherever available) and the given category(ies) for its GIF response. In the round 2 phase, we build several deep neural-based classifiers for the task and report the final predictions through a majority voting based ensemble technique. Our proposed models attain the best Mean Recall (MR) scores of 52.92% and 53.80% in round 1 and round 2, respectively.