Reinforcement learning (RL) in the real world necessitates the development of procedures that enable agents to explore without causing harm to themselves or others. The most successful solutions to the problem of safe RL leverage offline data to learn a safe-set, enabling safe online exploration. However, this approach to safe-learning is often constrained by the demonstrations that are available for learning. In this paper we investigate the influence of the quantity and quality of data used to train the initial safe learning problem offline on the ability to learn safe-RL policies online. Specifically, we focus on tasks with spatially extended goal states where we have few or no demonstrations available. Classically this problem is addressed either by using hand-designed controllers to generate data or by collecting user-generated demonstrations. However, these methods are often expensive and do not scale to more complex tasks and environments. To address this limitation we propose an unsupervised RL-based offline data collection procedure, to learn complex and scalable policies without the need for hand-designed controllers or user demonstrations. Our research demonstrates the significance of providing sufficient demonstrations for agents to learn optimal safe-RL policies online, and as a result, we propose optimistic forgetting, a novel online safe-RL approach that is practical for scenarios with limited data. Further, our unsupervised data collection approach highlights the need to balance diversity and optimality for safe online exploration.

As modern AI models become integral to everyday tasks, concerns about their inherent biases and their potential impact on human decision-making have emerged. While bias in models are well-documented, less is known about how these biases influence human decisions. This paper presents two interactive experiments investigating the effects of partisan bias in AI language models on political decision-making. Participants interacted freely with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model while completing political decision-making tasks. We found that participants exposed to politically biased models were significantly more likely to adopt opinions and make decisions aligning with the AI's bias, regardless of their personal political partisanship. However, we also discovered that prior knowledge about AI could lessen the impact of the bias, highlighting the possible importance of AI education for robust bias mitigation. Our findings not only highlight the critical effects of interacting with biased AI and its ability to impact public discourse and political conduct, but also highlights potential techniques for mitigating these risks in the future.

In online randomized experiments or A/B tests, accurate predictions of participant inclusion rates are of paramount importance. These predictions not only guide experimenters in optimizing the experiment's duration but also enhance the precision of treatment effect estimates. In this paper we present a novel, straightforward, and scalable Bayesian nonparametric approach for predicting the rate at which individuals will be exposed to interventions within the realm of online A/B testing. Our approach stands out by offering dual prediction capabilities--it forecasts both the quantity of new customers expected in future time windows and, unlike available alternative methods, the number of times they will be observed. We derive closedform expressions for the posterior distributions of the quantities needed to form predictions about future user activity, thereby bypassing the need for numerical algorithms such as Markov chain Monte Carlo. After a comprehensive exposition of our model, we test its performance on experiments on real and simulated data, where we show its superior performance with respect to existing alternatives in the literature. 1 Introduction The problem of predicting the size of a population from which random samples are drawn has a long history in the statistics literature. Originally motivated by applications in ecology, where the goal is typically to determine the number of distinct species of animals within a population (Fisher et al., 1943; Good, 1953; Burnham and Overton, 1979), a variation of this problem has recently received considerable attention also in the genomics literature, where scientists are interested in predicting the number of future rare variants to be observed within a genomic study (Ionita-Laza et al., 2009; Zou et al., 2016; Chakraborty et al., 2019; Masoero et al., 2022).

In many contexts it is useful to predict the number of individuals in some population who will initiate a particular activity during a given period. For example, the number of users who will install a software update, the number of customers who will use a new feature on a website or who will participate in an A/B test. In practical settings, there is heterogeneity amongst individuals with regard to the distribution of time until they will initiate. For these reasons it is inappropriate to assume that the number of new individuals observed on successive days will be identically distributed. Given observations on the number of unique users participating in an initial period, we present a simple but novel Bayesian method for predicting the number of additional individuals who will subsequently participate during a subsequent period. We illustrate the performance of the method in predicting sample size in online experimentation.