Split CIFAR-100 Split Mini-ImageNet Split Tiny-ImageNet 20 15 10 5 0 GEM A-GEM ER GSS GDUMB HAL MetaSP SOIF Ours Figure 1: Evaluating Out-of-Distribution (OOD) Generalization Capability: The performance of state-of-the-art rehearsal-based methods on the Split CIFAR-100, Split Mini-ImageNet, and Split Tiny-ImageNet datasets significantly drops on OOD samples, highlighting their lack of generalization. In this paper, we address this challenge by proposing a method that consistently outperforms existing approaches across all datasets. Machine learning models often suffer from catastrophic forgetting of previously learned knowledge when learning new classes. Various methods have been proposed to mitigate this issue. However, rehearsal-based learning, which retains samples from previous classes, typically achieves good performance but tends to memorize specific instances, struggling with Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization. This often leads to high forgetting rates and poor generalization. Surprisingly, the OOD generalization capabilities of these methods have been largely unexplored. In this paper, we highlight this issue and propose a simple yet effective strategy inspired by contrastive learning and data-centric principles to address it. We introduce Adaptive Contrastive Replay (ACR), a method that employs dual optimization to simultaneously train both the encoder and the classifier. ACR adaptively populates the replay buffer with misclassified samples while ensuring a balanced representation of classes and tasks. By refining the decision boundary in this way, ACR achieves a balance between stability and plasticity.

Continual learning (CL) aims to acquire new knowledge while preserving information from previous experiences without forgetting. Though buffer-based methods (i.e., retaining samples from previous tasks) have achieved acceptable performance, determining how to allocate the buffer remains a critical challenge. Most recent research focuses on refining these methods but often fails to sufficiently consider the varying influence of samples on the learning process, and frequently overlooks the complexity of the classes/concepts being learned. Generally, these methods do not directly take into account the contribution of individual classes. However, our investigation indicates that more challenging classes necessitate preserving a larger number of samples compared to less challenging ones. To address this issue, we propose a novel method and policy named 'Class-Adaptive Sampling Policy' (CASP), which dynamically allocates storage space within the buffer. By utilizing concepts of class contribution and difficulty, CASP adaptively manages buffer space, allowing certain classes to occupy a larger portion of the buffer while reducing storage for others. This approach significantly improves the efficiency of knowledge retention and utilization. CASP provides a versatile solution to boost the performance and efficiency of CL. It meets the demand for dynamic buffer allocation, accommodating the varying contributions of different classes and their learning complexities over time.

Machine learning models that are overfitted/overtrained are more vulnerable to knowledge leakage, which poses a risk to privacy. Suppose we download or receive a model from a third-party collaborator without knowing its training accuracy. How can we determine if it has been overfitted or overtrained on its training data? It's possible that the model was intentionally over-trained to make it vulnerable during testing. While an overfitted or overtrained model may perform well on testing data and even some generalization tests, we can't be sure it's not over-fitted. Conducting a comprehensive generalization test is also expensive. The goal of this paper is to address these issues and ensure the privacy and generalization of our method using only testing data. To achieve this, we analyze the null space in the last layer of neural networks, which enables us to quantify overfitting without access to training data or knowledge of the accuracy of those data. We evaluated our approach on various architectures and datasets and observed a distinct pattern in the angle of null space when models are overfitted. Furthermore, we show that models with poor generalization exhibit specific characteristics in this space. Our work represents the first attempt to quantify overfitting without access to training data or knowing any knowledge about the training samples.