Probabilistic Law Discovery (PLD) is a logic based Machine Learning method, which implements a variant of probabilistic rule learning. In several aspects, PLD is close to Decision Tree/Random Forest methods, but it differs significantly in how relevant rules are defined. The learning procedure of PLD solves the optimization problem related to the search for rules (called probabilistic laws), which have a minimal length and relatively high probability. At inference, ensembles of these rules are used for prediction. Probabilistic laws are human-readable and PLD based models are transparent and inherently interpretable. Applications of PLD include classification/clusterization/regression tasks, as well as time series analysis/anomaly detection and adaptive (robotic) control. In this paper, we outline the main principles of PLD, highlight its benefits and limitations and provide some application guidelines.

We propose a novel Reinforcement Learning model for discrete environments, which is inherently interpretable and supports the discovery of deep subgoal hierarchies. In the model, an agent learns information about environment in the form of probabilistic rules, while policies for (sub)goals are learned as combinations thereof. No reward function is required for learning; an agent only needs to be given a primary goal to achieve. Subgoals of a goal G from the hierarchy are computed as descriptions of states, which if previously achieved increase the total efficiency of the available policies for G. These state descriptions are introduced as new sensor predicates into the rule language of the agent, which allows for sensing important intermediate states and for updating environment rules and policies accordingly.

We introduce an extension to the Protégé ontology editor, which allows for discovering concept definitions, which are not explicitly present in axioms, but are logically implied by an ontology. The plugin supports ontologies formulated in the Description Logic EL, which underpins the OWL 2 EL profile of the Web Ontology Language and despite its limited expressiveness captures most of the biomedical ontologies published on the Web. The developed tool allows to verify whether a concept can be defined using a vocabulary of interest specified by a user. In particular, it allows to decide whether some vocabulary items can be omitted in a formulation of a complex concept. The corresponding definitions are presented to the user and are provided with explanations generated by an ontology reasoner.

In many tasks related to reasoning about consequences of a logical theory, it is desirable to decompose the theory into a number of components with weakly-related or independent signatures. This facilitates reasoning when signature of a query formula belongs to only one of the components. However, an initial theory may be subject to change due to execution of actions affecting features mentioned in the theory. Having once computed a decomposition of a theory, one would like to know whether a decomposition has to be computed again for the theory obtained from taking into account the changes resulting from execution of an action. In the paper, we address this problem in the scope of the situation calculus, where change of an initial theory is related to the well-studied notion of progression. Progression provides a form of forward reasoning; it relies on forgetting values of those features which are subject to change and computing new values for them. We prove new results about properties of decomposition components under forgetting and show when a decomposition can be preserved in progression of an initial theory.