Jupyter Notebook is an interactive development environment commonly used for rapid experimentation of machine learning (ML) solutions. Describing the ML activities performed along code cells improves the readability and understanding of Notebooks. Manual annotation of code cells is time-consuming and error-prone. Therefore, tools have been developed that classify the cells of a notebook concerning the ML activity performed in them. However, the current tools are not flexible, as they work based on look-up tables that have been created, which map function calls of commonly used ML libraries to ML activities. These tables must be manually adjusted to account for new or changed libraries. This paper presents a more flexible approach to cell classification based on a hybrid classification approach that combines a rule-based and a decision tree classifier. We discuss the design rationales and describe the developed classifiers in detail. We implemented the new flexible cell classification approach in a tool called JupyLabel. Its evaluation and the obtained metric scores regarding precision, recall, and F1-score are discussed. Additionally, we compared JupyLabel with HeaderGen, an existing cell classification tool. We were able to show that the presented flexible cell classification approach outperforms this tool significantly.

There is an increasing need to comprehensively characterize the kinematic performances of different Micromobility Vehicles (MMVs). This study aims to: 1) characterize the kinematic behaviors of different MMVs during emergency maneuvers; 2) explore the influence of different MMV power sources on the device performances; 3) investigate if piecewise linear models are suitable for modeling MMV trajectories. A test track experiment where 40 frequent riders performed emergency braking and swerving maneuvers riding a subset of electric MMVs, their traditional counterparts, and, in some cases, behaving as running pedestrians. A second experiment was conducted to determine the MMVs swerving lower boundaries. Device power source resulted having a statistically significant influence on kinematic capabilities of the MMVs: while e-MMVs displayed superior braking capabilities compared to their traditional counterparts, the opposite was observed in terms of swerving performance. Furthermore, performances varied significantly across the different MMV typologies, with handlebar-based devices consistently outperforming the handlebar-less devices across the metrics considered. The piecewise linear models used for braking profiles fit well for most MMVs, except for skateboards and pedestrians due to foot-ground engagement. These findings underscore that the effectiveness of steering or braking in preventing collisions may vary depending on the type and power source of the device. This study also demonstrates the applicability of piecewise linear models for generating parameterized functions that accurately model braking trajectories, providing a valuable resource for automated systems developers. The model, however, also reveals that the single brake ramp assumption does not apply for certain types of MMVs or for pedestrians, indicating the necessity for further improvements.