This comprehensive review article delves into the intricate realm of fault-tolerant control (FTC) schemes tailored for robotic manipulators. Our exploration spans the historical evolution of FTC, tracing its development over time, and meticulously examines the recent breakthroughs fueled by the synergistic integration of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and digital twin technologies (DTT). The article places a particular emphasis on the transformative influence these contemporary trends exert on the landscape of robotic manipulator control and fault tolerance. By delving into the historical context, our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of FTC schemes. This journey encompasses the transition from model-based and signal-based schemes to the role of sensors, setting the stage for an exploration of the present-day paradigm shift enabled by AI, ML, and DTT. The narrative unfolds as we dissect the intricate interplay between these advanced technologies and their applications in enhancing fault tolerance within the domain of robotic manipulators. Our review critically evaluates the impact of these advancements, shedding light on the novel methodologies, techniques, and applications that have emerged in recent times. The overarching goal of this article is to present a comprehensive perspective on the current state of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control within the context of robotic manipulators, positioning our exploration within the broader framework of AI, ML, and DTT advancements. Through a meticulous examination of both historical foundations and contemporary innovations, this review significantly contributes to the existing body of knowledge, offering valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and enthusiasts navigating the dynamic landscape of robotic manipulator control.

The importance of predictive maintenance is well-recognized in the industrial sector for several reasons, e.g., it allows for the reduction in machine downtime, it helps in reducing the production cost, and it is useful in enhancing the life of machines. Consequently, predictive maintenance is one of the key areas of research among the scientific community. Initially, the predictive maintenance used to be time-based but later on (with the advances in sensing technology), condition-based maintenance (CBM) gained more popularity. Maintenance of machine tools involve two key stages, i.e., diagnosis and prognosis. Prognosis deals with the prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) of the machine whereas diagnosis is concerned with detection and identification of various faults in the machine. Major approaches for prognosis include data-based approaches, knowledge-based approaches, and physics (model) based approaches. Diagnosis on the other hand is based on centralized or distributed approaches [1]. Key challenges in predictive maintenance include 1) Dealing with the noisy sensor data, 2) Uncertainty in the operating conditions, and 3) Diversity of tasks assigned to the machine. A comparison between time-based and condition-based maintenance strategies has been presented in [2].