Myronenko, Andriy
NVIDIA FLARE: Federated Learning from Simulation to Real-World
Roth, Holger R., Cheng, Yan, Wen, Yuhong, Yang, Isaac, Xu, Ziyue, Hsieh, Yuan-Ting, Kersten, Kristopher, Harouni, Ahmed, Zhao, Can, Lu, Kevin, Zhang, Zhihong, Li, Wenqi, Myronenko, Andriy, Yang, Dong, Yang, Sean, Rieke, Nicola, Quraini, Abood, Chen, Chester, Xu, Daguang, Ma, Nic, Dogra, Prerna, Flores, Mona, Feng, Andrew
Federated learning (FL) enables building robust and generalizable AI models by leveraging diverse datasets from multiple collaborators without centralizing the data. We created NVIDIA FLARE as an open-source software development kit (SDK) to make it easier for data scientists to use FL in their research and real-world applications. The SDK includes solutions for state-of-the-art FL algorithms and federated machine learning approaches, which facilitate building workflows for distributed learning across enterprises and enable platform developers to create a secure, privacy-preserving offering for multiparty collaboration utilizing homomorphic encryption or differential privacy. The SDK is a lightweight, flexible, and scalable Python package. It allows researchers to apply their data science workflows in any training libraries (PyTorch, TensorFlow, XGBoost, or even NumPy) in real-world FL settings. This paper introduces the key design principles of NVFlare and illustrates some use cases (e.g., COVID analysis) with customizable FL workflows that implement different privacy-preserving algorithms. Code is available at https://github.com/NVIDIA/NVFlare.
Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe?
Hatamizadeh, Ali, Yin, Hongxu, Molchanov, Pavlo, Myronenko, Andriy, Li, Wenqi, Dogra, Prerna, Feng, Andrew, Flores, Mona G., Kautz, Jan, Xu, Daguang, Roth, Holger R.
Federated learning (FL) allows the collaborative training of AI models without needing to share raw data. This capability makes it especially interesting for healthcare applications where patient and data privacy is of utmost concern. However, recent works on the inversion of deep neural networks from model gradients raised concerns about the security of FL in preventing the leakage of training data. In this work, we show that these attacks presented in the literature are impractical in FL use-cases where the clients' training involves updating the Batch Normalization (BN) statistics and provide a new baseline attack that works for such scenarios. Furthermore, we present new ways to measure and visualize potential data leakage in FL. Our work is a step towards establishing reproducible methods of measuring data leakage in FL and could help determine the optimal tradeoffs between privacy-preserving techniques, such as differential privacy, and model accuracy based on quantifiable metrics. Code is available at https://nvidia.github.io/NVFlare/research/quantifying-data-leakage.
QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results
Mehta, Raghav, Filos, Angelos, Baid, Ujjwal, Sako, Chiharu, McKinley, Richard, Rebsamen, Michael, Datwyler, Katrin, Meier, Raphael, Radojewski, Piotr, Murugesan, Gowtham Krishnan, Nalawade, Sahil, Ganesh, Chandan, Wagner, Ben, Yu, Fang F., Fei, Baowei, Madhuranthakam, Ananth J., Maldjian, Joseph A., Daza, Laura, Gomez, Catalina, Arbelaez, Pablo, Dai, Chengliang, Wang, Shuo, Reynaud, Hadrien, Mo, Yuan-han, Angelini, Elsa, Guo, Yike, Bai, Wenjia, Banerjee, Subhashis, Pei, Lin-min, AK, Murat, Rosas-Gonzalez, Sarahi, Zemmoura, Ilyess, Tauber, Clovis, Vu, Minh H., Nyholm, Tufve, Lofstedt, Tommy, Ballestar, Laura Mora, Vilaplana, Veronica, McHugh, Hugh, Talou, Gonzalo Maso, Wang, Alan, Patel, Jay, Chang, Ken, Hoebel, Katharina, Gidwani, Mishka, Arun, Nishanth, Gupta, Sharut, Aggarwal, Mehak, Singh, Praveer, Gerstner, Elizabeth R., Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree, Boutry, Nicolas, Huard, Alexis, Vidyaratne, Lasitha, Rahman, Md Monibor, Iftekharuddin, Khan M., Chazalon, Joseph, Puybareau, Elodie, Tochon, Guillaume, Ma, Jun, Cabezas, Mariano, Llado, Xavier, Oliver, Arnau, Valencia, Liliana, Valverde, Sergi, Amian, Mehdi, Soltaninejad, Mohammadreza, Myronenko, Andriy, Hatamizadeh, Ali, Feng, Xue, Dou, Quan, Tustison, Nicholas, Meyer, Craig, Shah, Nisarg A., Talbar, Sanjay, Weber, Marc-Andre, Mahajan, Abhishek, Jakab, Andras, Wiest, Roland, Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan M., Nazeri, Arash, Milchenko1, Mikhail, Marcus, Daniel, Kotrotsou, Aikaterini, Colen, Rivka, Freymann, John, Kirby, Justin, Davatzikos, Christos, Menze, Bjoern, Bakas, Spyridon, Gal, Yarin, Arbel, Tal
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses.
Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge
Bakas, Spyridon, Reyes, Mauricio, Jakab, Andras, Bauer, Stefan, Rempfler, Markus, Crimi, Alessandro, Shinohara, Russell Takeshi, Berger, Christoph, Ha, Sung Min, Rozycki, Martin, Prastawa, Marcel, Alberts, Esther, Lipkova, Jana, Freymann, John, Kirby, Justin, Bilello, Michel, Fathallah-Shaykh, Hassan, Wiest, Roland, Kirschke, Jan, Wiestler, Benedikt, Colen, Rivka, Kotrotsou, Aikaterini, Lamontagne, Pamela, Marcus, Daniel, Milchenko, Mikhail, Nazeri, Arash, Weber, Marc-Andre, Mahajan, Abhishek, Baid, Ujjwal, Kwon, Dongjin, Agarwal, Manu, Alam, Mahbubul, Albiol, Alberto, Albiol, Antonio, Alex, Varghese, Tran, Tuan Anh, Arbel, Tal, Avery, Aaron, B., Pranjal, Banerjee, Subhashis, Batchelder, Thomas, Batmanghelich, Kayhan, Battistella, Enzo, Bendszus, Martin, Benson, Eze, Bernal, Jose, Biros, George, Cabezas, Mariano, Chandra, Siddhartha, Chang, Yi-Ju, Chazalon, Joseph, Chen, Shengcong, Chen, Wei, Chen, Jefferson, Cheng, Kun, Christoph, Meinel, Chylla, Roger, Clérigues, Albert, Costa, Anthony, Cui, Xiaomeng, Dai, Zhenzhen, Dai, Lutao, Deutsch, Eric, Ding, Changxing, Dong, Chao, Dudzik, Wojciech, Estienne, Théo, Shin, Hyung Eun, Everson, Richard, Fabrizio, Jonathan, Fang, Longwei, Feng, Xue, Fidon, Lucas, Fridman, Naomi, Fu, Huan, Fuentes, David, Gering, David G, Gao, Yaozong, Gates, Evan, Gholami, Amir, Gong, Mingming, González-Villá, Sandra, Pauloski, J. Gregory, Guan, Yuanfang, Guo, Sheng, Gupta, Sudeep, Thakur, Meenakshi H, Maier-Hein, Klaus H., Han, Woo-Sup, He, Huiguang, Hernández-Sabaté, Aura, Herrmann, Evelyn, Himthani, Naveen, Hsu, Winston, Hsu, Cheyu, Hu, Xiaojun, Hu, Xiaobin, Hu, Yan, Hu, Yifan, Hua, Rui, Huang, Teng-Yi, Huang, Weilin, Huo, Quan, HV, Vivek, Isensee, Fabian, Islam, Mobarakol, Albiol, Francisco J., Wang, Chiatse J., Jambawalikar, Sachin, Jose, V Jeya Maria, Jian, Weijian, Jin, Peter, Jungo, Alain, Nuechterlein, Nicholas K, Kao, Po-Yu, Kermi, Adel, Keutzer, Kurt, Khened, Mahendra, Kickingereder, Philipp, King, Nik, Knapp, Haley, Knecht, Urspeter, Kohli, Lisa, Kong, Deren, Kong, Xiangmao, Koppers, Simon, Kori, Avinash, Krishnamurthi, Ganapathy, Kumar, Piyush, Kushibar, Kaisar, Lachinov, Dmitrii, Lee, Joon, Lee, Chengen, Lee, Yuehchou, Lefkovits, Szidonia, Lefkovits, Laszlo, Li, Tengfei, Li, Hongwei, Li, Wenqi, Li, Hongyang, Li, Xiaochuan, Lin, Zheng-Shen, Lin, Fengming, Liu, Chang, Liu, Boqiang, Liu, Xiang, Liu, Mingyuan, Liu, Ju, Lladó, Xavier, Luo, Lin, Iftekharuddin, Khan M., Tsai, Yuhsiang M., Ma, Jun, Ma, Kai, Mackie, Thomas, Mahmoudi, Issam, Marcinkiewicz, Michal, McKinley, Richard, Mehta, Sachin, Mehta, Raghav, Meier, Raphael, Merhof, Dorit, Meyer, Craig, Mitra, Sushmita, Moiyadi, Aliasgar, Mrukwa, Grzegorz, Monteiro, Miguel A. B., Myronenko, Andriy, Carver, Eric N, Nalepa, Jakub, Ngo, Thuyen, Niu, Chen, Oermann, Eric, Oliveira, Arlindo, Oliver, Arnau, Ourselin, Sebastien, French, Andrew P., Pound, Michael P., Pridmore, Tony P., Serrano-Rubio, Juan Pablo, Paragios, Nikos, Paschke, Brad, Pei, Linmim, Peng, Suting, Pham, Bao, Piella, Gemma, Pillai, G. N., Piraud, Marie, Popli, Anmol, Prčkovska, Vesna, Puch, Santi, Puybareau, Élodie, Qiao, Xu, Suter, Yannick R, Scott, Matthew R., Rane, Swapnil, Rebsamen, Michael, Ren, Hongliang, Ren, Xuhua, Rezaei, Mina, Lorenzo, Pablo Ribalta, Rippel, Oliver, Robert, Charlotte, Choudhury, Ahana Roy, Jackson, Aaron S., Manjunath, B. S., Salem, Mostafa, Salvi, Joaquim, Sánchez, Irina, Schellingerhout, Dawid, Shboul, Zeina, Shen, Haipeng, Shen, Dinggang, Shenoy, Varun, Shi, Feng, Shu, Hai, Snyder, James, Han, Il Song, Soni, Mehul, Stawiaski, Jean, Subramanian, Shashank, Sun, Li, Sun, Roger, Sun, Jiawei, Sun, Kay, Sun, Yu, Sun, Guoxia, Sun, Shuang, Park, Moo Sung, Szilagyi, Laszlo, Talbar, Sanjay, Tao, Dacheng, Tao, Dacheng, Khadir, Mohamed Tarek, Thakur, Siddhesh, Tochon, Guillaume, Tran, Tuan, Tseng, Kuan-Lun, Turlapov, Vadim, Tustison, Nicholas, Shankar, B. Uma, Vakalopoulou, Maria, Valverde, Sergi, Vanguri, Rami, Vasiliev, Evgeny, Vercauteren, Tom, Vidyaratne, Lasitha, Vivekanandan, Ajeet, Wang, Guotai, Wang, Qian, Wang, Weichung, Wen, Ning, Wen, Xin, Weninger, Leon, Wick, Wolfgang, Wu, Shaocheng, Wu, Qiang, Xia, Yong, Xu, Yanwu, Xu, Xiaowen, Xu, Peiyuan, Yang, Tsai-Ling, Yang, Xiaoping, Yang, Hao-Yu, Yang, Junlin, Yang, Haojin, Yao, Hongdou, Young-Moxon, Brett, Yue, Xiangyu, Zhang, Songtao, Zhang, Angela, Zhang, Kun, Zhang, Xuejie, Zhang, Lichi, Zhang, Xiaoyue, Zhao, Sicheng, Zhao, Yu, Zheng, Yefeng, Zhong, Liming, Zhou, Chenhong, Zhou, Xiaobing, Zhu, Hongtu, Zong, Weiwei, Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree, Farahani, Keyvan, Davatzikos, Christos, van Leemput, Koen, Menze, Bjoern
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e. 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that undergone gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset.
Non-rigid point set registration: Coherent Point Drift
Myronenko, Andriy, Song, Xubo, Carreira-Perpiñán, Miguel Á.
We introduce Coherent Point Drift (CPD), a novel probabilistic method for nonrigid registration of point sets. The registration is treated as a Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation problem with motion coherence constraint over the velocity field such that one point set moves coherently to align with the second set. We formulate the motion coherence constraint and derive a solution of regularized ML estimation through the variational approach, which leads to an elegant kernel form. We also derive the EM algorithm for the penalized ML optimization with deterministic annealing. The CPD method simultaneously finds both the nonrigid transformation and the correspondence between two point sets without making any prior assumption of the transformation model except that of motion coherence. This method can estimate complex nonlinear nonrigid transformations, and is shown to be accurate on 2D and 3D examples and robust in the presence of outliers and missing points.
Non-rigid point set registration: Coherent Point Drift
Myronenko, Andriy, Song, Xubo, Carreira-Perpiñán, Miguel Á.
We introduce Coherent Point Drift (CPD), a novel probabilistic method for nonrigid registrationof point sets. The registration is treated as a Maximum Likelihood (ML)estimation problem with motion coherence constraint over the velocity field such that one point set moves coherently to align with the second set. We formulate the motion coherence constraint and derive a solution of regularized ML estimation through the variational approach, which leads to an elegant kernel form. We also derive the EM algorithm for the penalized ML optimization with deterministic annealing. The CPD method simultaneously finds both the nonrigid transformation and the correspondence between two point sets without making any prior assumption of the transformation model except that of motion coherence. Thismethod can estimate complex nonlinear nonrigid transformations, and is shown to be accurate on 2D and 3D examples and robust in the presence of outliers and missing points.